50 likes | 133 Vues
Learn about responses from various universities on transitioning to open systems in the LMS selection process. Understand the common reasons, challenges, and experiences encountered, such as resource drain, differences in data formats, and migration issues.
E N D
LMS Selection Project Notes on CUCCIO Open Systems Questions (Andrea) 2 June 2010
Who responded? • Western: Issue RFI this fall, consider Blackboards's NG of WebCT, also open source. • UVic: Moodlesince 2007, from Blackboard (WebCT, since 4.1).Small pocket of Sakai on campus. • Queen’s:Moving to Moodle, from WebCT 4.1. Used 1 year in 2 pilots, 10+ courses, 1000’s of students. • Windsor: Sakai 2.5 since 2006, to 2.7 in Fall 2010; moved from homegrown Notes app. • Virginia Tech:Sakai for about 1-2 years for collaband project groups. Sole LMS in Fall 2010.
Why? • Typical and common reasons: Cost (though not always seen as lower in end), not hand-cuffed, philosophy, community of support, etc. • Also, Virginia Tech and Uvic burned by bad Blackboard support in upgrades (as with McMaster)
Migration experiences (Not unique to Open System move, of course.) • Drain on resources • Differences in structure, data format, modules • Most data types cannot be automatically converted. E.g., quizzes, discussion forums must all be recreated • Used existing staff, some student hires, but varied a lot. Generally, need lots of help!
System support and development • Using own staff • Not much development happening