1 / 31

Structural developments Working Group 1

Education and Research in Biosystems or Agricultural and Biological Engineering in Europe; a Thematic Network ERABEE TN. Structural developments Working Group 1. Tasks allocation. 8 Workpackages allocated to 5 specific WGs. WP 1. WP 6. WP 2. WP 3. WP 4. WP 5. WP 7. WP 8. SC. WG 1.

corib
Télécharger la présentation

Structural developments Working Group 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Education and Research in Biosystems or Agricultural and Biological Engineering in Europe; a Thematic NetworkERABEE TN Structural developments Working Group 1

  2. Tasks allocation 8 Workpackagesallocated to 5 specific WGs WP 1 WP 6 WP 2 WP 3 WP 4 WP 5 WP 7 WP 8 SC WG 1 WG 2 WG 3 WG 4 WG 5

  3. Structural Developments • ERABEE-TN: WORKING GROUP 1 • Aims and objectives • WG 1 will work on the operational objectives of Work-package PR EA: •  Work-package PR EA - Structural developments: • support the gradual expansion and further advancement of the structural developments of the European Agricultural Engineering programs of studies and analysing, initiating and promoting their step-by-step critical transition and structural development towards the Biosystems Engineering programs of studies; • expansion of Agricultural and Biological Engineering programs of studies to include the emerging areas of bio-fuels, bio-based materials and useful waste, as examples of applications of current and future societal needs, along with product quality as related to the new CAP developments.

  4. Structural Developments ERABEE-TN: WORKING GROUP 1 Aims and objectives  Working Group 1 - WG1: Develop further the structure of the Biosystems Engineering discipline in Europe building upon the outcomes of USAEE-TN: definition of the emerging discipline, establishment of new modules in the core curricula and professional targets (main theme of workshop 1)  Working Group 1 - WG1: Define the scope of Biosystems Engineering programs of studies placing special emphasis on the emerging areas of bio-fuels and biomaterials and quality of products, as they relate to the new CAP developments (main theme of workshop 2).

  5. OUTCOMES FOR WG1 ERABEE-TN: WORKING GROUP 1 Detailed description - P1 Proceedings of the first Workshopon the definition of the emerging Agricultural and Biological Engineering discipline in Europe and the establishment of new modules and professional targets, adapting and expanding the core curricula developed by USAEE-TN (one volume in English; contribution by all partners) DONE Detailed description - P2 Proceedings of the second Workshop on the updating and expansion of the scope of Biosystems Engineering programs of studies placing special emphasis on the emerging areas of bio-fuels and biomaterials and quality of products, as they relate to the new CAP developments (one volume in English; contribution by all partners) DONE

  6. OUTCOMES FOR WG1 ERABEE-TN: WORKING GROUP 1 Detailed description – P8 Investigation of the implementation of new European programs of studies in Biosystems Engineering based on the already developed and approved by FEANI-EMC core curricula of the first two cycles (report in English; contribution by all partners) Aims at exploitingthe results of the core curricula and ECTS table, developed under the USAEE-TN and approved by FEANI, by adapting them to the broader area of Biosystems Engineering, addressed to a wider audience at a European level. The innovative and novel goal of ERABEE-TN is that it seeks to promote this critical transition, which requires major restructuring of the traditional Agricultural Engineering programs of studies in Europe. It also aims at enhancing the compatibility among the new programmes of Biosystems Engineering and facilitate greater mobility of skilled personnel, researchers and students. Target groups: It will be cascaded among Universities, academic and professional associations, related thematic networks and projects, researchers. Deadline: 31.10.2010

  7. Timetable - I STATUS BY 10.2009

  8. Timetable - I STATUS BY 10.2009

  9. Timetable - I STATUS BY 10.2009

  10. Timetable - I STATUS BY 10.2009

  11. Timetable - I STATUS BY 10.2009 (*) based on updating the main outcomes of POMSEBES relevant to Work-package PR EA)

  12. Timetable - I STATUS BY 10.2009

  13. Timetable - I Working Group 1:Work-package PR EA - Structural developments Working Group 2:Work-package RES - Teaching and research Working Group 3: Work-package PR EP - Quality assessment and accreditation TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL REPORT BY 10.2010

  14. Timetable - I TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL REPORT BY 10.2010 Dept. of Natural Resources Management and Agricultural Engineering, AUA, Greece

  15. Timetable - I Working Group 1:Work-package PR EA - Structural developments Working Group 2:Work-package RES - Teaching and research Working Group 3: Work-package PR EP - Quality assessment and accreditation Working Group 4:Work-package PROM - International recognition and attractiveness TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL REPORT BY 10.2010

  16. Timetable - I Working Group 1:Work-package PR EA - Structural developments Working Group 2:Work-package RES - Teaching and research Working Group 3: Work-package PR EP - Quality assessment and accreditation Working Group 4:Work-package PROM - International recognition and attractiveness Working Group 5: Work-package: PROM - International recognition and attractiveness Work-package EXP - Exploitation plan of ERABEE TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL REPORT BY 10.2010 ERABEE WG1 Meeting, 9 February, Rome

  17. Timetable - I TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL REPORT BY 10.2010

  18. WG1 OUTCOMES OUTCOME: P1- Proceedings of the first Workshop • 1. Proceedings of the first Workshop • Brief synopsis of main themes/results of the 1st workshop (K. Navickas) • Papers of the 1st workshop • (on the theme: Develop further the structure of the Biosystems Engineering discipline in Europe: definition of the emerging discipline, establishment of new modules in the core curricula and professional targets)

  19. WG1 OUTCOMES OUTCOME: P2- Proceedings of the second Workshop • 2a. Proceedings of the second Workshop • Meeting the Needs of the Developing Bio-based Economy (D. Briassoulis) • A brief synopsis of main themes/results of the 2nd workshop (K. Navickas, D. Briassoulis) • Papers of the 2nd workshop • (on the theme: Define the scope of Biosystems Engineering discipline placing special emphasis on the emerging areas of bio-fuels and biomaterials and quality of products, as they relate to the new CAP developments)

  20. WG1 OUTCOMES OUTCOME: P8A - Structural Developments Towards the Biosystems Engineering Programs of Studies in Europe (3rdVOLUME;based on outcomes 2b-6 ) • 2b. International developments in the field of bio-based materials and biofuels • Developments in the field of bio-based materials (D. Briassoulis) • Developments in the field of biofuels (Jukka Ahokas, Laura Alakukku, Hannu Mikkola) • Investigation of related topics from contemporary developments in the industrial/enterprises sector (Giacomo Scarascia Mugnozza, Antonio Comparetti, Pierluigi Febo)

  21. WG1 OUTCOMES OUTCOME: P8A - Structural Developments Towards the Biosystems Engineering Programs of Studies in Europe (3rdVOLUME;based on outcomes 2b-6 ) • 3. The emerging areas of bio-fuels and biomaterials and quality of products, as they relate to the new CAP developments • Introduction (D. Briassoulis) • The Emerging Area of Biofuels (K. Navickas) • Quality of products (Jean-Marie, Aerts Luc Reyns, Bart Nicolaï, Herman Ramon, Diego Planeta, Margarita? ) • The Emerging Area of Bio-Based Materials (D. Briassoulis)

  22. WG1 OUTCOMES OUTCOME: P8A - Structural Developments Towards the Biosystems Engineering Programs of Studies in Europe (3rdVOLUME;based on outcomes 2b-6 ) • Definition of the emerging Agricultural and Biological Engineering discipline in Europe • (P. Panagakis, D. Briassoulis, E. Nikopoulos, J. P. Douzals, G. Scarascia Mugnozza, P. Febo, A. Comparetti, J. Fehrmann, F. Ayuga) • (with US contributions:: S. Mostaghimi, M. L. Wolfe, G. Riskowski, K. C. Ting, R. Kanwar) • Introduction • Evolution of Agricultural and Biological Engineering in the United States • Evolution of Biosystems Engineering in Europe • The definition of the Agricultural and Biological Engineering in the US • The European concept of the evolving discipline of Biosystems Engineering • Definition of the new discipline of Biosystems Engineering NOTE: This material of the section has been based to a large extent on updating the material of the section: “Objective 1. The new (emerging) discipline of Biosystems Engineering“ 1st Workshop Proceedings of POMSEBES (Policy Oriented Measures In Support of the Evolving Biosystems Engineering Studies) held in USA – EU; Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 14 – 15, 2007

  23. WG1 OUTCOMES OUTCOME: P8A - Structural Developments Towards the Biosystems Engineering Programs of Studies in Europe (3rdVOLUME;based on outcomes 2b-6 ) • Establishment of new modules and professional targets, adapting and expanding the core curricula developed by USAEE-TN • (P. Panagakis, D. Briassoulis, E. Nikopoulos) (with the contributions, for the U.S:: S. Mostaghimi) • Introduction • Key elements of compatibility of the Biosystems Engineering program of studies in US and EU • Desired minimum competences for the graduates of compatible programs of the Biosystems Engineering discipline in US and EU • Optional competences for the graduates of various modules of compatible programs of studies in the Biosystems Engineering discipline • Establishment of new modules and professional targets • Proposed policy measures for the evolving Biosystems Engineering discipline in EU NOTE: This material of the section has been based to a large extent on updating the material of the section: “ Objective 1: Develop a uniform structure for compatible programs of the Biosystems Engineering discipline“, 2nd Workshop Proceedings of POMSEBES (Policy Oriented Measures In Support of the Evolving Biosystems Engineering Studies in USA–EU); Crete Greece, June 21-22, 2008 Link: Pages 67-80 WG1 Structural Developments.pdf

  24. WG1 OUTCOMES OUTCOME: P8A - Structural Developments Towards the Biosystems Engineering Programs of Studies in Europe (3rdVOLUME;based on outcomes 2b-6 ) • 6. The emerging areas of bio-fuels and biomaterials and quality of products, as they relate to the new CAP developments • Updating and expansion of the scope of Biosystems Engineering programs of studies placing special emphasis on the emerging area of bio-fuels (K. Navickas) • Updating and expansion of the scope of Biosystems Engineering programs of studies placing special emphasis on the emerging area of quality of products (Jean-Marie, Aerts Luc Reyns, Bart Nicolaï, Herman Ramon, Diego Planeta, Margarita?) • Updating and expansion of the scope of Biosystems Engineering programs of studies placing special emphasis on the emerging area of bio-based materials (D. Briassoulis)

  25. WG1 OUTCOMES OUTCOME: P8(B) - Investigation of the implementation of new European programs of studies in Biosystems Engineering (3rdVOLUME) • 7. P8- Investigation of the implementation of new European programs of studies in Biosystems Engineering • Outline of P8: PRESENTATION OF CASE EXAMPLES? • UCD, • KUL, • LEON, • Hohenheim • ??? • Partners to follow EurAgEng recognition process? • Partners to follow EuRACE labelling accreditation? • SYNERGY WITH WG5 ON EXPLOITATION

  26. WG1 OUTCOMES Cooperation of WG1 with WG2 in support of WG3 (first two years) for developing outcomes P5, P7, P11 and P12 • Outline of synergy • Contribution of WG1 through • Updating of the collected preliminary data on the structure of the Biosystems Engineering discipline in Europe (UCD, KUL, LEON, Hohenheim, ??) • - Investigation of related topics from international developments in the field (K. Navickas, D.Briassoulis) • - Investigation of related topics from contemporary developments in the industrial/enterprises sector (Giacomo Scarascia Antonio Comparetti, Pierluigi Febo) • Synthesis of main outcomes of PR EA and RES (WG1, WG2 leaders) • Integration of activities of all Workpackages with the contribution of selected synergies to support the operational objectives of Workpackage PR EP: • Quality assessment and accreditation (PR EP) (WG3 LEADER)

  27. WG1 OUTCOMES Cooperation of WG1 with WG2 in support of WG3 (first two years) for developing outcomes P5, P7, P11 and P12 • THE OBJECTIVE OF WG3 IS A STRATEGIC ONE • IT DOES NOT CONCERN IMPLEMENTATION OF QA AND ACCREDIATATION • Establishment of recognition process in synergy with WG5 • Finalise the recognition structure in synergy with EurAgEng and P.Febo to facilitate the implementation of the recognition by WG5 soon • Establishment of EurACE labelling scheme as the main accreditation tool for Biosystems Engineering programs of studies in Europe • Analyse the EuRACE framework and the strategy for its implementation for Biosystems Engineering programs of studies to facilitate the implementation of the scheme by WG5

  28. WG1 OUTCOMES Cooperation of WG1 with WG2 and WG3 in support of WG4 (all three years) for developing outcomes P6, P13, P14 and P15 • Outline of synergy • Contribution of WG1 through provision of information and feedback in support of the operational objectives of Workpackage PR OM: • International recognition and awareness raising (PROM) • Investigation of related topics from international developments in the field (K. Navickas, D.Briassoulis) • Investigation of related topics from contemporary developments in the industrial/enterprises sector (Giacomo Scarascia Antonio Comparetti, Pierluigi Febo) • WG4 SUGGESTIONS?

  29. WG1 OUTCOMES 10. Cooperation of WG1 with WG2, WG3 and WG4 in support of WG5 for organising and carrying out dissemination and exploitation activities • Outline of synergy • Provision of information and feedback in support of the operational objectives of Workpackage DISS-EXP: • Dissemination of results achieved of ERABEE (DISS) • Exploitation plan of ERABEE (EXP) • Papers and presentations as a result of synergy between Dissemination and WG1, WG2, WG5: (next slides..) • Should we consider D8 as a result of synergy between Exploitation and WG1, WG2, WG5?

  30. WG1 OUTCOMES 10. Cooperation of WG1 with WG2, WG3 and WG4 in support of WG5 for organising and carrying out dissemination and exploitation activities • PLEASE CHECK BEFORE UPDATING: • MISSING EVENTS? • IMPROVE PRESENTATION? • TO BE USED ALSO BY WG5

  31. WG1 OUTCOMES 10. Cooperation of WG1 with WG2, WG3 and WG4 in support of WG5 for organising and carrying out dissemination and exploitation activities • PLEASE CHECK BEFORE UPDATING: • MISSING PUBLICATIONS? • MISSING INFO: AUTHORS, DATES • IMPROVE PRESENTATION? • TO BE USED ALSO BY WG5

More Related