SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

The Complex Relationship Between Intelligence, IQ, and Crime: History and Implications

dillon-roberts avatar
dillon-roberts
11 diapositives · 272 Views · Nov 14, 2014

This overview explores the intricate connections among intelligence, IQ, and crime, tracing the history of mental testing from Alfred Binet's pioneering work in psychological evaluation to the controversial interpretations of IQ scores in criminal behavior. It addresses key issues such as the spuriousness of correlations and the criticisms of the Bell Curve thesis. With a focus on historical developments and modern implications, this analysis highlights the impact of race, class, and societal factors on the perceived relationship between IQ and crime, emphasizing the need for nuanced understanding in the field.

#the complex relationship between intelligence, iq, and crime: history and implications #the complex relationship between intelligence, iq, and crime: history and implications ppt #powerpoint #presentation
The Complex Relationship Between Intelligence, IQ, and Crime: History and Implications - slide 1
01 / 11The Complex Relationship Between Intelligence, IQ, and Crime: History and Implications
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

The Complex Relationship Between Intelligence, IQ, and Crime: History and Implications
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Intelligence, IQ, and Crime • History of mental testing and IQ • The relationship between IQ and Crime • Issues of Spuriousness • Direct, or Indirect Effect • Criticisms of the Bell Curve

  2. Alfred Binet • French scientist who began in the field of “craniometry” • Began to doubt the validity of this method • Around 1900, he started “psychological” testing (commissioned by government) • Devised several “mental tasks” (counting coins, spatial reasoning)

  3. Binet’s Admonishment 1.Scores are a practical device • They do not buttress any theory of “intelligence” 2.Scores are a “rough empirical guide” for identifying retarded children • They should not be used to rank normal children 3.Children identified as retarded should be helped • Low scores should not mark children as “innately incapable”

  4. The Creation of “IQ” • Binet: eventually assigned an “mental age” to each task (normal x years of age should complete) • Subtract the physical age from the mental age to see how big the gap was (identify those in need) • Later, others argued that the mental age should be divided by the physical age • “Intelligence Quotient” was born

  5. The American “bastardization” • Binet’s methods adopted by scientists in U.S. • They managed to break all of the “rules” • H.H. Goddard • coined the term “moron,” set at a mental age of 12 • avid in the eugenics movement • Lewis Terman • Created the “Stanford-Binet” IQ exam • Goal = “rational society” where people could be assigned jobs based on intelligence

  6. IQ tests today • No longer “mental age/physical age” • All correlate with the Stanford Binet or other early versions • Calibrated to produce a mean of 100 • The “Flynn effect” • Still multiple tasks covering different cognitive areas

  7. Seven J. Gould • Two biggest mistakes regarding IQ scores • 1. Reification • 2. Hereditarian fallacy

  8. IQ and Crime • Early positivists (Goddard…) found large differences between criminals and non-criminals • As testing improved, this difference shrunk • Sutherland (1940s): it will dissapear • Currently: 8-10 point gap • Why this difference???

  9. Possible Spuriousness • Race, Class, SES, Culture? • Controlling for these effects, the relationship remains • Detection Hypothesis? • Detected vs. Undetected offenders = no difference • Impulsivity? • Ruled out through statistical control

  10. If relationship is non-spurious • The “Direct Effect Model” • (Hernnstien and Murray) Low IQ Crime • Indirect Effects • Low IQ school trouble Delinquency labeling process • Biological: • Low IQ is proxy for neuropsychological damage • (N.P. damage x Parenting) Delinquency

  11. Criticisms of the Bell Curve • Only 3 variables in model (not enough control) • Could control for school performance, other factors • IQ explains only 3% of the variation in crime • The correlation is about .06 • Is this important enough to justify their policy implication?? • Ranked with other “predictors,” IQ is near the bottom of the list