More-than-Moore Roadmapping Update

1. More-than-MooreRoadmapping Update Patrick Cogez, Mart Graef, Bert Huizing, Michel Brillouet, Reinhard Mahnkopf

2. More than Moore: Diversification Analog/RF Passives HV Power Sensors Actuators Biochips Interacting with people and environment Non-digital content System-in-package (SiP) 130nm 90nm Baseline CMOS: CPU, Memory, Logic 65nm Information Processing Digital content System-on-chip (SoC) Combining SoC and SiP: Higher Value Systems More Moore: Miniaturization 45nm 32nm 22nm 16 nm . . . V Beyond CMOS Moore’s Law & More than Moore (MtM)

3. Visual Representation Digital Processing &Storage Interact More Moore Power & Power Mgt More than Moore

4. Why a More than Moore roadmap ? • ITRS has demonstrated value of roadmapping for CMOS • Identify pre-competitive research domains, enabling cooperation between industries, institutes and universities. • Sharing of R&D efforts • Reduction of development costs and time • Synchronization of the R&D community with the Manufacturing community • Increase resource efficiency through focus • Promote market growth and job creation • More than Moore roadmapping offers a similar but more challenging opportunity • Need to propose a roadmapping methodology • White paper (published in Dec. 2010, see ITRS webpage)

5. MtM White Paper –Necessary conditions for an industry-wide roadmapping effort • restricted set of figures of merits (FOM) • convergence of opinion among a majority of the key players on the progress trends that these figures of merit are expected to follow (LEP) • potential market of significant size inducing a wide applicability of the technology (WAT) • willingness to share information (SHR) • existence of a community of players (ECO)

6. Example of technology evaluation draft FOM = Figure Of Merit; LEP = Law of Expected Progress SHR = Willingness to SHaRe information ; WAT = Wide Applicability of Technology ECO = Existing COmmunity 6

7. “More-than-Moore” “More Moore” Application – Function – Technology interplay functions needed applications FOM designs and devices lead markets size, suitability designtools societal needs processes

8. Parallel actions ReleasedDec. 2010 COMPLETED • ITRS White Paper on MtM • Why is roadmapping important & successful? • MtM is different from CMOS • General roadmapping methodology • General map Methodology for selectingnew MtM domains ITRS roadmapson selected MtM domains (2011 edition) • CATRENE SC Initiative on MtM • Experiment the roadmapping methodology……on dedicated domains • « Topical » meetings • Provide • great challenges • technical tables Inputs forroadmapping new MtM domains IN PROGRESS

9. SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Topical meeting on Energy, Power • The scope of »Power« • The Broad range of parameters: • from millivolts to hundreds of kilovolts, • from microwatts to megawatts • from micrometers to nanometers. • Energy efficiency, energy generation and energy distribution are also linked to the term “power”. • Roadmapping requires a careful classification and a close look at the different technologies and applications. • As a first approach it is suggested to focus on the low and medium power range, which can be called more or less “integrated power”. • 8 orders of magnitude: from a 3W sugar-cube sized power supply for mobile phones (top) to power plants with more than 100 MW (bottom). Automotive applications (<100kW) belong to the medium power segment (middle). Sugar cube cellphone power supply (3 W) Car (1 W – 100 kW) Power plant (> 100 MW) Dr. J. Pelka, Fraunhofer-Verbund Mikroelektronik

10. SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Topical meeting on Energy, Power source: ECPE (European Center for Power Electronics e.V.)

11. SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Topical meeting on Lighting courtesy to Prof. G.Q.(Kouchi) Zhang, Philips

12. SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Topical meeting on Lighting • Eligible Technologies for Roadmapping - Possible figures of merit (FOM) • Efficiency (target >90% quantum efficiency, >90% light extraction, 55% overall efficacy) • Intensity (target 5000 lm) • Spectral range from IR to UV • Lifetime of organic light sources (target: >20.000h) • Panel size for organic light sources (target >20m²) • Quality of white: (color temperature, color rendering, color reproduction, closing the green gap) • Cost (cent per lumen) (target <1c/lm) Dr. J. Pelka, Fraunhofer-Verbund Mikroelektronik

13. SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Topical meeting on Lighting courtesy to Prof. G.Q.(Kouchi) Zhang, Philips

14. SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Topical meeting on Healthcare • Very diverse field - multiple roadmaps • “Big” domains • Life sciences (centralized diagnostics, Point-of-Care devices) • Implantable devices • Body-Area Networks (wearable healthcare but also lifestyle/fitness devices) • Pharma – related devices (transdermal, subcutaneous drug delivery) • High level of interdisciplinarity REGULATORY ENABLERS Semiconductor industry VALUE CHAIN eco-system for wearable health systems FDA Clinical experts Wireless sensor node development and manufacturing Government / Academia Research centres Mobile phone operators Standardization bodies IT infrastructure Health insurance companies European union Medical service providers source: Chris Van Hoof / imec

15. ITRS MtM - In summary … • Off to a good start … • Some MtM devices / functions already adressed today !  Wireless • Historical relationships between some iTWG and « downstream » roadmapping organizations (iNEMI…) • More than Moore roadmapping methodology (white paper), http://www.itrs.net/ • In progress / to be done • Methodology implementation • By Catrene scientific committee working group • By iTWG • Strengthening of links with other roadmapping organizations, reuse whenever possible • Involvement of new communities into ITRS • ITRS 2011 roadmap release with some MtM implementation • Strenghtening/expanding ANALOG in RF/Wireless working group • Exploring MEMS as pilot for a new ITRS working group • MtM workshop at ITRS 2011 Spring meeting in Potsdam/Germany, on Wednesday, 4/13/2011