SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Trafficking in Human Beings

doris avatar
9 diapositives · 278 Views · Oct 09, 2014

Trafficking in Human Beings. ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY MEMBER STATES IN SUPPORT OF THEIR COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES. Background to the questionnaire.

Trafficking in Human Beings - slide 1
01 / 9Trafficking in Human Beings
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Trafficking in Human Beings
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Trafficking in Human Beings ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY MEMBER STATES IN SUPPORT OF THEIR COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES

  2. Background to the questionnaire • As part of the United Kingdom's Presidency of the European Union a questionnaire on trafficking entitled “Tackling trafficking in human beings: best practice in policy and procedure” was issued to all member States on the 26 July 2005. • 18 out of 25 member States responded.

  3. Initial findings (1) • 16 Member States said the police led on fight against trafficking • 7 MS were unable to provide information on the running costs of support provisions • 13 MS said that research had been undertaken • 12 MS had systems in place to raise awareness • Only 3 MS said they had funding for re-integration programmes

  4. Initial findings (2) • inconsistency of approach across the EU • unreliable data collection • lack of clarity for front line staff • lack of consistency in training • little or no evaluation of benefits of support provisions

  5. Initial findings (3) • ad hoc arrangements with national and international NGOs • little evaluation of the impact of media and educational strategies • lack of evaluation of returns & reintegration assistance

  6. Areas for consideration (1) Funding • ring-fenced funding • seizure and asset confiscation of traffickers funds

  7. Areas for consideration (2) Scoping • develop common guidelines for research and templates for data collection • victim profiling in source, transit and destination countries • exchange of information to avoid duplication of effort and make best use of resources including evaluation of existing strategies • greater use of front line data from NGOs

  8. Areas for consideration (3) Prevention/reducing demand • make better use of bodies such as Eurojust and Europol • mapping of available support and reintegration services to ensure member States know what is available • joint working • targeted awareness raising • creation of EU national contact points

  9. In summary • funding • commonality of data collecting and evaluation • joint working • training • awareness raising campaigns