1 / 21

Muon Global Run Quality

Muon Global Run Quality. OUTLINE Results from May 1 st to May 31 st and prospects for June 2004. Muon Event Quality Muon Lum’y Block Quality. With.

drakes
Télécharger la présentation

Muon Global Run Quality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Muon Global Run Quality • OUTLINE • Results from May 1st to May 31st and prospects for June 2004. • Muon Event Quality • Muon Lum’y Block Quality Tom Diehl

  2. With Victor Abazov, Fritz Bartlett, Victor Bezzubov, Dmitri Denisov, Gaston Gutierrez, Al Ito, Rob McCroskey, Martijn Mulders, Geoff Savage, Dennis Shpakov, Stefan Soldner, Linda Stutte, Jeff Temple, Valerie Tokmenin, Markus Wobisch, Yuri Yatsunenko Experts on the muon detector hardware, muon L1 trigger, muon ID, and controls and monitoring. Tom Diehl

  3. All runs Bad runs Muon Run Quality Updated 2002 to 2004 • May 2004 has 35.3 pb-1 • 2.5 pb-1 Bad • Toroid Magnet (1.8 pb-1) • Miscellaneous (0.7 pb-1) • 2002: 18.2% bad runs • 2003: 2.6 % bad runs • 2004: 2.0% bad runs (was 0.3% before May) (all these are luminosity weighted). Tom Diehl

  4. Toroid Operation Failure • The Problem • During Toroid Magnet Reversal the reversing switch stops before contact is made with the bus to the coils. Current is shorted. • Current appears normal (1500 A), voltage required to produce it is low (2V instead of ~90 V). • Discovered when coil cooling water was colder then expected. • Impact is that no toroid magnet field was very small. • The Run Ranges • May 18th to May 19th 193107-193111 1.7 pb-1. • June 9th 193834-193837 0.8 pb-1. Tom Diehl

  5. Toroid Operation Failure • The Main Symptoms in the data (graded Bad): • Local muon momentums will be overestimated but not infinite • Multiple scattering in the calorimeter and toroid causes deflection q ~ 1/p. • RecoCert Plot is local muon pT and h in toroid problem run and normal run. Tom Diehl

  6. Toroid Operation Failure • New alarms added on the Toroid Magnet voltage should decrease amount of data recorded in this condition. Tom Diehl

  7. Prospects for June 2004 • More than 41 pb-1 delivered so far this month. • Bad Things • Toroid magnet problem; 0.8 pb-1 • A coincidence of dead PDTs on June 16th to 17th (due to dsp code test?) affected runs 194073 to 194135. Fixed on controlled access. Tom Diehl

  8. Muon Event Quality • Muon ID has content and access methods for muon error words By Crate. See: • www-d0.fnal.gov/phys_id/muon_id/d0_private/certif/p14/index.html • X’ing # (not turn #) !@#$%^&*( • RVS (~a weak hardware checksum) • SRQ error (but we don’t write such events) Tom Diehl

  9. Muon Event Quality • Gavin H. looked at data from run 173521 to 180965 (Feb to Oct 2003). • 5.6% of runs had some problem. Tom Diehl

  10. Muon Event Quality • Gavin says 1.5% of events showed some problem • That’s more than I thought. We don’t see that in the control room, typically. • Lots of these occurred in run 179141. Problem with the central scintillator data occurred then. We will be changing this run’s quality score. • On the general question of what to do • I’m not sure we should trivially reject events with the problem. • There is a lot of redundancy in part of the muon system. • Cases we might reject the event include • Central scintillator because it reads out A*C in one crate • Suggests we should include module-level information • We need to get some experience with this information before we make a recommendation. Tom Diehl

  11. Muon Lum’y Block Quality • Plan to compile information form the SES and mark luminosity blocks in the database that have run-pausing alarms. • No progress to report. Tom Diehl

  12. Summary • The Muon Good Run lists can be found in the RUNS QUALITY DATABASE. • May 2004 has 2.5 pb-1 “Bad” muon runs out of 35 pb-1. • Toroid magnet problems was the main cause and we modified the alarms so that this problem will be avoided. • Use at least “reasonable” grade runs. • We have event level data quality in tmbs and are beginning to use it in muon_id. • We need to get some experience with it before we can say how errors impact the physics. Tom Diehl

  13. My talk ends here. • Slides further in are in long-term storage. Tom Diehl

  14. Procedure • I finish within a few days of the end of a given month (See D0Note 3938). • Use runs query database to produce a list of runs that were taken with trigger %global%. • Verify whether or not all readout crates were part of the run. • Read muon, and sometimes captain, global monitor, and daq logbooks for signs of problems or fixes. Check examine plots. • Check the L1 trigger cross sections, the number of muon triggers, and the fraction of events which came from muon triggers in each run. • I don’t really check L2 or L3. That should be another pair of lists. • Check with experts from all muon subsystems. • Input from folk looking at Reco output. • At times parts of this process are automated via python scripts. • Enter into the Run Quality Database. C&D are “reasonable”. Lower grades are “Bad”. Tom Diehl

  15. Run Grades • C is grade for runs with no known missing (front-end) modules, high voltage problems, serious sync problems, etc … • D if not a C • so long as the data determination of eff’ys using “Tight” and “Loose” muons could provide a measurement of the eff’y of all of the components of muon local tracking criteria. That is … • S is for special runs, especially those that are from “%global%” trigger lists. • Otherwise F. • Missing readout crates, trigger off, magnets off*, etc. Tom Diehl

  16. A & B Quality Runs • A or B is not applicable, yet. Getting no closer! • Event level raw data integrity flags in the thumbnail. Done by muon algorithms people as of Beaune. • Required to get this into RecoCert • The latency loophole in alarm system persists. Solved Michael B. and Geoff S. Prior to Beaune we documented and checked that we have run-pausing alarms covering important muon failures • But at the moment info is in flat files located on SAM (data-tier “significant-event”) and for recent data on disc at /online/log/ses -> SAM). • SES run-pausing alarms need to go to Lum’y database\ • More on this later in the talk. Tom Diehl

  17. Bad run causes 11/22/03 – 04/30/04 Numbers of occurrences. These may span many runs in sample ~144 pb-1. • PDT’s: Missing PDT crate x34 18 nb-1 on May 8th. • L1 trigger cross section too high or too low: once for <1 nb. 11/26/2003, a 293 event run. A couple other instances amounting to 1 or 2 nb-1. • L1Mu triggers out-of-sync for a big fraction of run 192577 on May 3rd 367 nb-1. A candidate for quality by lum’y block. • MDTs: missing readout crate: once for 23 nb-1 01/01/2004. • Missing MDT Crate 3 nb-1 on March 9th. • Forward & Central scint.: missing readout crate: once for 428 nb-1. Failed front-end crate lvps 01/18/2004. Tom Diehl

  18. Warnings Since Sept. 2003 • The Run Quality Database (muon part) handles: • Muon L1 Trigger (muon part) • But NOT the Muon L2, Muon L3, or CTT. • You have to measure those on your own. • Run 192009 to 192015 inclusive central muon L2 was rejecting all muon triggers. If we scored on L2 we’d apply F. Tom Diehl

  19. SES Alarms Example • There was a Solenoid magnet quench on Feb 17, 2004 in run 189395. L/R (=0.5H/50x10-3 Ohms) => takes 10 seconds for the field to drop 1/e. Field dropping from – 4800 A to 0 A. • It took us ~ 1s to alarm on the change. In that time the field changed by about 6 %. Tom Diehl

  20. SES Alarms Example • I looked in /online/log/ses/se_log.20040217-000000CST and found the alarm in LBN 3099452 (one more than the LBN in which it occurred). I searched for field “run_paused & 189395”. grep run_paused se_log.20040217-000000CST | grep 189395 v4 f() 1077045274.85 run ONL_RUN_189395/run_paused 0 d0olc.fnal.gov 0 none none none none none run_paused 189395 3099452 {'Comment': 'Run paused automatically.', 'Pause_Reason': 'DMAX_MAG_SOL/AMPS', 'autopause': 1, 'comics_runtype': 'data', 'configname': 'official/global_CMT-12.34', 'physics': 1, 'runtype': 'physics', 'sdaq_type': 'MONITOR'} • I could also have looked in /online/log/ses/lbn files, a subset of all SES messages for run-pausing alarms from April 2002 to end of Oct. 2003. 15 magnet monitoring failures of which 3 are magnet quenches. Also, 133 muon hv trips & 1139 total run-pausing alarms. • This stuff to go to Lum’y database by LBN and system. Tom Diehl

  21. L1 Triggers, For Instance Run 176185: D Run 176211: F Run 176538: F Tom Diehl

More Related