1 / 28

Break-Even Analysis

Break-Even Analysis . Greg Hiatt May 5, 2002. Defined:. Break-even analysis examines the cost tradeoffs associated with demand volume. Overview: Break-Even Analysis. Benefits Defining Page Getting Started Break-even Analysis Break-even point Comparing variables Algebraic Approach

eyad
Télécharger la présentation

Break-Even Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Break-Even Analysis Greg Hiatt May 5, 2002

  2. Defined: Break-even analysis examines the cost tradeoffs associated with demand volume.

  3. Overview: Break-Even Analysis • Benefits • Defining Page • Getting Started • Break-even Analysis • Break-even point • Comparing variables • Algebraic Approach • Graphical Approach

  4. Benefits and Uses: • The evaluation to determine necessary levels of service or production to avoid loss. • Comparing different variables to determine best case scenario.

  5. Defining Page: • USP = Unit Selling Price • UVC = Unit Variable costs • FC = Fixed Costs • Q = Quantity of output units sold (and manufactured)

  6. Defining Page: Cont. • OI = Operating Income • TR = Total Revenue • TC = Total Cost • USP = Unit Selling Price

  7. Getting Started: • Determination of which equation method to use: • Basic equation • Contribution margin equation • Graphical display

  8. Break-even analysis:Break-even point • John sells a product for $10 and it cost $5 to produce (UVC) and has fixed cost (FC) of $25,000 per year • How much will he need to sell to break-even? • How much will he need to sell to make $1000?

  9. Algebraic approach:Basic equation Revenues – Variable cost – Fixed cost = OI (USP x Q) – (UVC x Q) – FC = OI $10Q - $5Q – $25,000 = $ 0.00 $5Q = $25,000 Q = 5,000 What quantity demand will earn $1,000? $10Q - $5Q - $25,000 = $ 1,000 $5Q = $26,000 Q = 5,200

  10. Algebraic approach:Contribution Margin equation (USP – UVC) x Q = FC + OI Q = FC + OI UMC Q = $25,000 + 0 $5 Q = 5,000 What quantity needs sold to make $1,000? Q = $25,000 + $1,000 $5 Q = 5,200

  11. Graphical analysis: Dollars 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 Break-even point 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Quantity Total Cost Line Total Revenue Line

  12. Graphical analysis:Cont. Dollars 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 Break-even point 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Quantity Total Cost Line Total Revenue Line

  13. Scenario 1: Break-even Analysis Simplified • When total revenue is equal to total cost the process is at the break-even point. TC = TR

  14. Break-even Analysis: Comparing different variables • Company XYZ has to choose between two machines to purchase. The selling price is $10 per unit. • Machine A: annual cost of $3000 with per unit cost (VC) of $5. • Machine B: annual cost of $8000 with per unit cost (VC) of $2.

  15. Break-even analysis:Comparative analysis Part 1 • Determine break-even point for Machine A and Machine B. • Where: V = FC SP - VC

  16. Break-even analysis:Part 1, Cont. Machine A: v = $3,000 $10 - $5 = 600 units Machine B: v = $8,000 $10 - $2 = 1000 units

  17. Part 1: Comparison • Compare the two results to determine minimum quantity sold. • Part 1 shows: • 600 units are the minimum. • Demand of 600 you would choose Machine A.

  18. Part 2: Comparison Finding point of indifference between Machine A and Machine B will give the quantity demand required to select Machine B over Machine A. Machine A = Machine B FC + VC = FC + VC $3,000 + $5 Q = $8,000 + $2Q $3Q = $5,000 Q = 1667

  19. Part 2: ComparisonCont. • Knowing the point of indifference we will choose: • Machine A when quantity demanded is between 600 and 1667. • Machine B when quantity demanded exceeds 1667.

  20. Part 2: ComparisonGraphically displayed Dollars 21,000 18,000 15,000 12,000 9,000 6,000 3,000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Quantity Machine A Machine B

  21. Part 2: ComparisonGraphically displayed Cont. Dollars 21,000 18,000 15,000 12,000 9,000 6,000 3,000 Point of indifference 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Quantity Machine A Machine B

  22. Exercise 1: • Company ABC sell widgets for $30 a unit. • Their fixed cost is$100,000 • Their variable cost is $10 per unit. • What is the break-even point using the basic algebraic approach?

  23. Exercise 1:Answer Revenues – Variable cost - Fixed cost = OI (USP x Q) – (UVC x Q) – FC = OI $30Q - $10Q – $100,00 = $ 0.00 $20Q = $100,000 Q = 5,000

  24. Exercise 2: • Company DEF has a choice of two machines to purchase. They both make the same product which sells for $10. • Machine A has FC of $5,000 and a per unit cost of $5. • Machine B has FC of $15,000 and a per unit cost of $1. • Under what conditions would you select Machine A?

  25. Exercise 2:Answer Step 1: Break-even analysis on both options. Machine A: v = $5,000 $10 - $5 = 1000 units Machine B: v = $15,000 $10 - $1 = 1667 units

  26. Exercise 2:Answer Cont. Machine A = Machine B FC + VC = FC + VC $5,000 + $5 Q = $15,000 + $1Q $4Q = $10,000 Q = 2500 • Machine A should be purchased if expected demand is between 1000 and 2500 units per year.

  27. Summary: • Break-even analysis can be an effective tool in determining the cost effectiveness of a product. • Required quantities to avoid loss. • Use as a comparison tool for making a decision.

  28. Bibliography: Russel, Roberta S., and Bernard W. Taylor III. Operations Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pentice-Hall, 2000. Horngren, Charles T., George Foster, and Srikant M. Datar. Cost Account. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pentice-Hall, 2000.

More Related