1 / 33

Design of Open Channels

Design of Open Channels. Riprap. Riprap. Riprap- large stones, cobbles or boulders used to stabilize areas subject to erosion. Protect soil from erosive forces Improve Stability In channels where vegetation is not suitable, riprap is often used for stabilization.

fagan
Télécharger la présentation

Design of Open Channels

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Design of Open Channels Riprap

  2. Riprap • Riprap- large stones, cobbles or boulders used to stabilize areas subject to erosion. • Protect soil from erosive forces • Improve Stability • In channels where vegetation is not suitable, riprap is often used for stabilization. • Used on both channel sides and bottoms.

  3. Riprap • Rocks used for riprap should be resistant to weathering processes. • Rough angular rocks are preferred. • Want to place rock in such a way that segregation by size is avoided. • Surfaces on which riprap is places should be well compacted and stable.

  4. Riprap • Design: find a rock size large enough that the force attempting to overturn individual rocks is less than the gravitational force holding the rocks in place. • Riprap is graded so design procedure must include a definition of an appropriate gradation of sizes.

  5. Riprap • Proper gradation will leave an armored channel that is stable when smaller particles have eroded. • Must also select an appropriate underlying filter so that water flowing beneath the riprap will not erode the base material. • Minimum layer thickness should be 1.5 times stone diameter, but no less than 6 in.

  6. Riprap • Channel sections with riprap should be carefully monitored to ensure stability. • Any damage should be repaired immediately to prevent much more extensive damage.

  7. Riprap Design Procedures • Three procedures presented: • The Federal Highway Administration (FHA) procedure. • The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) procedure. • The Colorado State University (CSU) procedure.

  8. FHA Procedure • Uses a maximum stable depth of flow given by dmax = mSn, where n = -1.0 and • D50 is the riprap diameter in feet such that 50% of the stones have a diameter smaller than D50. Thus:

  9. FHA Procedure • The velocity of flow is given by the Manning-Stickler equation where:

  10. FHA Procedure • Channel Design: • Assume a D50 • Compute dmax and v • Determine the appropriate channel dimensions. • Calculations made easier by assuming R = dmax. • Check capacity.

  11. SCS Procedure • Based on a chart that can be approximated by: • Simons and Senturk (1977, 1992) recommend that D75 be about 1.5D50 so that:

  12. SCS Procedure The SCS also presented a chart based on the Isbash curves which can be approximated by This relationship assumed that D100=2D50

  13. SCS Procedure • This equation does not take into account S. • If the expression is substituted into the relationship is:

  14. CSU Procedure • Incorporates a safety factor (SF). • If SF=1 then the forces that are holding the riprap in place are just balanced by those tending to move the particles. • An SF 1.5 is preferred to add stability for particles that have diameters < D50. • Both the FHA and SCS procedures result in SF < 1.0 using the CSU criteria. • This indicates potential failure problems.

  15. Q FL M4 Fd M3 Channel Bed WsinQ Discrete Particle M2 PR W WcosQ M1 CSU Procedure Based on considering the forces on a particle on a channel bed sloping at an angle, Q, with the moment arms about the point of rotation, PR.

  16. CSU Procedure The SF for a given flow situation is the ratio of the resisting moments to the overturning moments. The key to a stable design is to make the SF>1.

  17. CSU Procedure • Must manipulate the SF equation so that it has parameters that are readily measurable or can be determined from tables and graphs. • One measurable quantity is the angle of repose, f, of a given riprap, given in Figure 4.17. • For very angular riprap with diameters ≥ 1.5 in. f≈42º.

  18. CSU Procedure • When there is no flow FL=Fd=0. • If the angle of the channel bottom, Q, is increased until the particles just begin to move, the particles are at their angle of repose, f, and SF=1, hence

  19. Substituting into our original SF equation: or Where hb is a stability factor given by: CSU Procedure

  20. or CSU Procedure • The nature of hb can be determined by looking at a plane horizontal bed where q=0 and all weight is acting in the verticle direction.

  21. and CSU Procedure • For SFplane=1, the bed is at a point of incipient motion, and the tractive force t is equal to the critical tractive force tc. • Under conditions other than incipient motion on a plane bed we can assume that:

  22. For fully turbulent flow: If t = gdS then we can use these equations to design channels if the flow velocity is given by CSU Procedure Where SG is the specific gravity of the particles and D is the representative particle diameter, typically the average diameter (D50). Note: These equations are for channel bottoms only. Banks are considered next.

  23. Channel Bank Stability

  24. Channel Bank Stability • Forces are different than on channel bed because drag forces are not aligned with the downslope gravitational forces. • The SF for a channel bank is given by:

  25. Channel Bank Stability Where tmax is the maximum shear on the channel bank To derive these equations it was assumed that FL/Fd = ½.

  26. Selecting Proper Gradation • It is important that the riprap have a gradation such that the voids between larger particles are filled with smaller particles. • This reduces flow beneath the riprap and the formation of open pockets. • Figure 4.19 shows the proposed size distribution of riprap (Simons and Senturk, 1977, 1992).

  27. Selecting an Underlying Filter • Filter blanket-underlying layer of gravel or other granular material. • A properly designed filter blanket is needed beneath the riprap when the particle size of the riprap is much larger than the base material. • Criteria for sizing filters were developed for drain pipes to prevent piping of soil into the drain.

  28. (1) also (2) also (3) also Filter Criteria

  29. Underlying Filter Criteria • Filter thickness should be approximately ½ the thickness of the riprap, but in no case less than 6” to 9”. • Plastic filter cloth is being used in some cases rather than granular filter material.

  30. Flow in Channel Bends • Because of bend curvature, the peak velocity tends to be outside of the center line. • The result is steeper velocity gradients and higher shear values on the outside banks than occur in straight channels. • The extra shear must be considered when sizing riprap, vegetation and temporary channel linings.

  31. Flow in Channel Bends • Common Procedures: • For riprap lined channels, increase the riprap size in the channel bend. • For vegetated channels, line sharp bends with riprap. • Standard practice to protect the outside bank of the entire bend.

  32. Method to Determine Shear in Channel Bends • Determine the velocity in a straight channel. • Determine the radius of curvature of the outside bank, Rd. • Calculate v2/Rd. • Determine the correction factor, k3 from Figure 4.21. • Calculate the corrected bank shear from • Use this shear in the stability parameters h and h’ and determine the required riprap size using the procedures discussed for channel banks. Note: These procedures have limited verification.

  33. Channel Linings Final Comments • The flow range over which differing channel linings offer protection depends on channel shape and slope. • Fig. 4.22 is is a reasonable guide to the type of channel lining required for varying flow rates and slopes. • Ranges will change based on side slopes and erodibility of underlying material.

More Related