1 / 9

The Ph.D. Completion Project: Phase II Technical Workshop

The Ph.D. Completion Project: Phase II Technical Workshop. Daniel Denecke, Helen Frasier, and Kenneth Redd December 9, 2006 Washington, DC. Pre-Meeting Workshop Goals. Provide project overview and a set of tools and templates for collecting and interpreting completion and attrition data

haines
Télécharger la présentation

The Ph.D. Completion Project: Phase II Technical Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Ph.D. Completion Project:Phase II Technical Workshop Daniel Denecke, Helen Frasier, and Kenneth Redd December 9, 2006 Washington, DC

  2. Pre-Meeting Workshop Goals • Provide project overview and a set of tools and templates for collecting and interpreting completion and attrition data • Hear from Phase I Project Research Partners • Provide information about the new Phase II RFP to ensure a pool of highly competitive proposals

  3. Ph.D. Completion Project (Phase I) • Supported by Pfizer & Ford Foundation • 45 Universities Submitted Proposals • 21 “Research Partners” w/ awards up to $100k • Three-Year Grants for: • Data Collection and Submission • “Interventions” Design and Implementation • Assessment of Impact and Best Practice Idea Exchange • 24 “Project Partners” • 1/3 of “Project Partners” are collecting and submitting quantitative data

  4. Project Activities • Data Collection, Submission, and Analysis • Completion Data, Demographic Data, Attrition Data • Exit Surveys • Factor Assessments • Program-level and University-wide Interventions or Treatments • Evaluation/Assessment • Campus and National Leadership

  5. Areas of Strategic Intervention

  6. Completion Management Graduate dean as: • Protector of Student Interests • Champion of Quality Across Programs • Steward of Financial Resources Graduate schools can and should: • Collect Data > Share Data > Determine Appropriate Solutions to Specific Problems > Reward and Monitor Changes

  7. Meeting External Demands and Internal (University) Objectives • Spellings Commission • Student Right-to-Know Act • The NRC Doctoral Assessment • Domestic Recruiting • International Competition

  8. Lessons Learned from the PhD Completion Project • Knowing data and feedback to departments is a powerful “intervention” • Graduate deans and faculty must work together in interpreting data and setting goals • Knowing and sharing data is not enough • Graduate deans and faculty must work together in designing activities and “interventions” • Data have multiple policy implications

  9. Peeling the Onion: National Data and Demographic Differences • Completion • Overall • Broad field • Disciplines • Attrition • Gender • Race/Ethnicity • Citizenship

More Related