1 / 7

Guidelines for Effective Paper Summarization in Participatory Design

This document outlines key strategies for summarizing academic papers effectively, specifically in the context of participatory design. It emphasizes the importance of clearly stating the problem being addressed, the proposed solutions, and the novelty of the work. The summarization process should assume that readers are unfamiliar with the paper, requiring clarity and specificity in discussing goals, research questions, and methodologies. Furthermore, the guidelines encourage focusing on the presented work's success and potential extensions, while ensuring grammatical accuracy.

harva
Télécharger la présentation

Guidelines for Effective Paper Summarization in Participatory Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IS 760: Participatory design October 10, 2011

  2. Grading • Everything is going out today! (for real) • Comments on writing • Good overall, but room for improvement

  3. Summarizing papers • Tell the story of the paper. What’s the point? • Clearly state the problembeingaddressed • Clearly state the proposed solution/approach • What’s new or novel? (Relative to whenitwaspublished) • Summarize the work, not the paper • Assume the reader has not recentlyread the paper

  4. Summarizing papers • Be clear and specific • What are the specific goals / research questions / hypotheses? • Is new technologyintroduced? If so, describeit • Technicalterms? Describethem • Describe the studyconducted, how resultsweremeasured, whatresultswere • Takerole of researcher • Abstract/intro/conclusion canbe a useful guide

  5. More on reviewing papers • Discussion • Focus on the work presented. Was it successful? How could it be made more successful? How might it be extended? • OK to think of other uses or further studies, but stay focused • Focus on research over implementation questions • Some good discussion questions–but bring them up in class  • Spelling and grammar matter

  6. Next 2 weeks • Big HCI conferences! • UIST 2011, October 17-19 • ASSETS 2011, October 24-26 • In-class design activities with IS 629 • No reading :D • Normal schedule resumes 10/31 w/ CSCW

  7. Next • Jasmine and Anton, AdWords • Germaine and Andy, Participatory Design

More Related