1 / 6

Research Needs in Ship Structures

Research Needs in Ship Structures. Matthew Collette University of Michigan mdcoll@umich.edu msdl.engin.umich.edu November 18 th , 2011. Improved Lifecycle Forecasting. Design stage Better metrics linked to actual costs and failures

hertz
Télécharger la présentation

Research Needs in Ship Structures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research Needs in Ship Structures Matthew Collette University of Michigan mdcoll@umich.edu msdl.engin.umich.edu November 18th, 2011

  2. Improved Lifecycle Forecasting • Design stage • Better metrics linked to actual costs and failures • Complement existing, effective, but safety-oriented acceptance criteria (allowable stress, LRFD, etc.) • Design beyond the rules • What to do with voyage monitoring data? • What if it is “worse” than assumed? – updated safety margin • How to use the (potentially terabytes) of data to make more money or improve performance? • Warning signs that if you build it, they may not come….. • Life extension programs • What does reaching safe-life fatigue limit mean? • What to do with increasing risk profile? How to justify vs. new construction?

  3. Simplified Methods for Damaged Structures • Rapid ultimate strength tools today almost always based/similar to Smith method (ULTSTR etc.) • Assumed intact transverse frames that will force buckling of longitudinal panels only • After damage (collision, grounding, explosion) frames often compromised • Non-linear FEA • How to support design optimization or casualty response? • Better toolset needed – ULTSTR(D) U.S.S. Radford – photo from SSC Case Study IV www.shipstructure.org

  4. Aluminum Structures • New material topology • HAZ – welds – local material inhomogeneity and tensile tearing • Alloy-dependent properties • Fracture criteria and fracture arrest • New material challenges • Sensitization of 5xxx alloys in mill and in service • 5xxx extrusions? • 6xxx corrosion limits? • Better toolset needed “…the aluminium extrusions had fractured along the weld lines and that there was a lack of plastic deformation (…) the structure appeared to have failed along the welds rather than deforming in a controlled manner‟” The Right Honourable Lord Cullen, Ladbroke Grove accident report, excerpt by Dr. Kotsikos, NewRail, Newcastle University

  5. Optimization, Verification, and Decision Making • Better multi-objective optimizers • Early design stage trade between weight, performance, cost, durability etc. • Need to be fast and robust • Visualize and communicate trade space • Validate – beyond software V&V • Procedure – we now often link different codes and standards • Are code assumptions compatible ? • Essential always ad-hoc ?

  6. People ~ Personal Sense • Universities world-wide – hard to find marine structures specialists to teach, research • Compared to hydrodynamics, far fewer PhD students in most programs in US and Europe • Experts for industrial applications • Next generation of professors • Growing need for SSC and T&R to elevate profile and excite young people to work on these challenges

More Related