1 / 7

Analyzing Old and New Plots of Roman Pot Configurations in Particle Physics

This document showcases a comparison of various plots generated from both traditional and modern Roman Pot configurations used in high-energy physics experiments. It provides detailed equations for each Roman Pot setup, illustrating how combining two pots leads to a system of four equations with four unknowns. The analysis includes mean displacement values across different configurations and discusses data distribution, aligning with historical context from a presentation on October 21, 2009. The insights help understand particle scattering processes effectively.

hiero
Télécharger la présentation

Analyzing Old and New Plots of Roman Pot Configurations in Particle Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Just to show you some plots (old and new) • Just a combination of a few old and new plots … • 2 equations for each roman pot on each side of the IP: • x = a11 x*+ Leffxx* + a13 y* + a14y* • y = a31 x*+ a32 x* + a33 y* + Leffy y* • Combining two Roman Pot, one’d have 4 equations and 4 unknowns  solvable  -t,  … • as I talked about in (Oct. 21, 2009) : http://www.c-ad.bnl.gov/kinyip/pp2pp/vertex,%20theta%20and%20-t%20distributions.ppt

  2. The “mean” is now in the order of magnitude of 0.x mm. • x(EVU-WVD) ~1.6 mm • y(EVU-WVD) ~0.2 mm • x(EVD-WVU) ~0.3 mm • y(EVD-WVU) ~0.3 mm • Before alignment, it’s ~ some mm.

  3. -t = 4P02Sin2(/2) , P0 = 100. 21557 calculated from B and G =191.500006443 in RampEditor (of C-AD) -t distribution without any collinearity cut After loose collinearity cut

  4.  =Tan-1(Py/Px) without collinearity cut with loose collinearity cut

  5. with loose collinearity cut

  6. with loose collinearity cut

  7. Frac. of golden events / triggered events : • Runs with loose collinearity cut • 10182025 71% 65% • 10183035 78% 74% • 10183037 77% 73%

More Related