NHANES 1999-2004 Analytic Strategies

1 / 50

# NHANES 1999-2004 Analytic Strategies

## NHANES 1999-2004 Analytic Strategies

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
##### Presentation Transcript

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics NHANES 1999-2004 Analytic Strategies Deanna Kruszon-Moran, MS

2. Analyzing Data NHANES 1999-2004Preparing your data files Downloadingdemographic, questionnaire, exam and lab files. • Files are no longer available as self-extracting zip files. • Documentation and procedure files are now in Adobe PDF format and can be viewed or accessed directly via the web link • Clicking on the data link will allow you to store the data file or open it directly with SAS. • Data files are in SAS transport (.xpt) format.

4. Preparing your data files Merging: • Merge all files by sequence number to the demographic file. • Verify the numbers of records merged and the final sample number against the published frequencies on the web. • Be sure they are what you expected and all merges worked correctly.

5. Know your data • Run basic frequencies and cross tabulations. • Know your target population. • Understand how item was measured • (how is the item defined, topcoded, recoded) • Recode variables as necessary • (example: age groups, positive/negative lab tests, high/low BP, high/low cholesterol etc.). • Recode unknown/refusals as missing data (77, 99 recode to missing). • Check your coding – run frequencies in SAS.

6. Know your data Continuous Outcome Data: • Look for outliers in your measure. • Run Proc Univariate. • Look for outliers among the weights. • Use Proc Univariate on the weight variable. • Outlying variables especially those with large weights can really influence your estimates. • Look at normality. • Consider transformations. • Log, square root, power.

7. NHANES Sample Design NHANES is a complex, multistage, probability cluster design of the civilian, noninstitutionalized US population.

8. Sample Weights To analyze NHANES data you must use the sample weights to account for :

9. Stage 1 Counties Stage 2 Segments Stage 3 Households Stage 4 Individuals 1. The base probability of selection

10. 2. Over sampling NHANE 1999-2004 - Oversampled • African Americans • Mexican Americans • Persons with low income • Adolescents aged 12-19 • Persons aged 60+

11. Screening interview N=13312 Interview Non-response 22% Household interview N=10291 78% Exam Non-response 7% MEC Exam N=9471 71% Non-response to the interview & exam Sample persons age 20+

12. Non-response issues for NHANES Non-response: • Most components have some level of individual item or component non-response. • ONLY non-response to the interview and exam has already been accounted for in the weights. • All additional non-response to the outcome measure of interest should be examined against all possible predictors. • Potential biases should be discussed. • If non-response is “high”, re-weighting should be considered.

13. Why weight?

14. Sample weights – Which weights?

15. Two, Four, Six, Eight - How can we estimate? For 4 years of data from 2001-2004 - MEC4YR = 1/2 WTMEC2YR ; For 6 years of data from 1999-2004 – if sddsrvyr=1 or sddsrvyr=2 then MEC6YR = 2/3 WTMEC4YR ; /* for 1999-2002 */ If sddsrvyr=3 then MEC6YR = 1/3 WTMEC2YR ; /* for 2003-2004 */ * Only when analyzing years 1999-2002, you should not combined 2 year weights but use the 4 year weights provided.

16. Two, Four, Six, Eight - How can we estimate? Future years of data will be combined similarly: For 6 years of data from 2001-2006 - if sddsrvyr in (2,3,4) then MEC6YR = 1/3 WTMEC2YR; For 8 years of data from 1999-2006 – if sddsrvyr=1 or sddsrvyr=2 then MEC8YR = 1/2 WTMEC4YR ; /* for 1999-2002 */ if sddsrvyr=3 or sddsrvyr=4 then MEC8YR = 1/4 WTMEC2YR etc; /* for 2003-2006 */

17. Sample Weights - Subsamples Subsamples and appropriate weights: • Look at your primary variable of interest and the corresponding weight. • Look at all other variables you want to combine with it. • Are all from the interview? Exam? Subsample (i.e. fasting, audiometry, dioxin, VOC’s …) ? • Use the weight from the smallest subsample for your analysis. • Be consistent!

18. Sample Weights - Subsamples Subsamples and appropriate weights: • Be careful about combining subsamples beyond MEC + VOC’s, Interview + Dioxin etc. • Combining subsamples such as Environmental + AM fasting could be problematic. • Some subsamples are mutually exclusive. • Weights were not designed for combining subsamples and may not produce good estimates.

19. Preparing for Analyses Subsetting the data for SUDAAN: • If using MEC exam weights - SUBSET the data on those MEC EXAMINED in SAS before using SUDAAN. • If using other subsample weights – subset the data on those in the subsample corresponding to the weights you are using. • Then use the SUBPOPN statement in the SUDAAN procedure to further subset your data by age, gender etc. to reflect the target population you are interested in analyzing.

20. Sample Weights Example: You are interested in examining the association of high triglycerides, blood pressure, and body mass index (BMI) controlling for race/ethnicity on females age 20-59 from the 6 years of data from 1999-2004.

21. Sample Weights Step 1 – Determine the smallestsample population for the analysis to determine the correct weight to use. • Race/ethnicity, gender and age are in the interview. • Blood pressure and weight come from the MEC exam a subset of those interviewed. • Triglycerides were measured on a subsample of those MEC examined who fasted for 8 hours and came to the AM MEC exam. • Therefore, the fasting subsample is the smallest subsample in the analysis and you would use the AM fasting weights (WTSAF2YR and WTSAF4YR).

22. Sample Weights Step 2 – Combine weights in SAS prior to the SUDAAN procedure for the 6 years from 1999-2004: If sddsrvyr in (1,2) then WEIGHT6 =2/3*WTSAF4YR ; /* 1999-2002 */ If sddsrvyr=3 then WEIGHT6= 1/3*WTSAF2YR ; /* 2003-2004*/

23. Sample Weights Step 3 – Subset your data set in SAS to reflect the weight being used (AM fasting weights WTSAF2YR or WTSAF4YR): SAS Code: IF WTSAF2YR ne . or WTSAF4YR ne . ;

24. Sample Weights Step4 – Last specify the correct weight to use using the weight statement in SUDAAN and subset your data to obtain the subpopulation of interest using the SUBPOPN statement in SUDAAN (females age 20-59): WEIGHT WEIGHT6 ; SUBPOPN riagendr=2 and ridageyr > 19 and ridageyr < 60 ;

25. NHANES 1999-2000Variance Estimation Why must you use the sample design to estimate the variance? • NHANES is a cluster design • Individual within a cluster are more similar than those in other clusters. • This homogeneity or clustering results in a reduction of our effective sample size because we choose individuals within cluster vs randomly throughout the population.

26. NHANES 1999-2004Variance Estimation Why must you use the sample design to estimate the variance? • Variance estimates that do not account for this intra cluster correlation are too low and biased. • Survey software such as SUDAAN or SAS Survey procedures must be used to account for the complex design and produce unbiased variance estimates • These procedures require information on the sample design (i.e. identification of the PSU and strata) for each sample person.

27. NHANES 1999-2000Variance Estimation For the initial 1999-2000 data release we recommended: • Using JK-1/Jackknife/”leave-one-out” procedure. • Required 52 replicate weights for each of 52 groups created. Only provided for 1999-2000. • Can still be used if you have software that can produce the replicate weights. • Replicate weights for this procedure will no longer be created on the data set. • Too cumbersome

28. NHANES 1999-2004Variance Estimation We now recommend: Using the Taylor series (linearization) method • Same as that used in NHANES III. • We now provide “Masked Variance Units” (MVU’s) in place of primary sampling units (PSU’s) to maintain confidentiality. • Design variables are called - SDMVSTRA and SDMVPSU.

29. Design Variables SDMVSTRA and SDMVPSU • Found in the demographic file. • Found in all two year data sets and can be combined for 4 or 6 or … year data sets. • Can be used the same as the actual stratum and PSU variables. • Produce variance estimates close to those using the “true” design. • Data MUST be sorted by SDMVSTRA and SDMVPSU first, before using SUDAAN.

30. In SAS: IF WTMEC2YR NE . ; (Include only those with weights) PROC SORT OUT=Datasort ; BY SDMVSTRA SDMVPSU; (sort on design variables) SUDAAN code : PROC Descript DATA=Datasort DESIGN=WR ; NEST SDMVSTRA SDMVPSU ; WEIGHT WTMEC2YR ; SUBPOPN RIDAGEYR > 11 AND RIDAGEYR < 50 AND TOXTEST=1 ; TABLES Raceth2*Sex ; Sample SUDAAN Code

31. SAS code (Do not use WHERE or BY in procedure) : If RIDAGEYR > 11 AND RIDAGEYR < 50 AND TOXTEST=1 then INCLSP=1 ; else INCLSP=2 ; PROC Surveymeans data=data ; Strata SDMVSTRA; Cluster SDMVPSU; Weight WTMEC2YR ; Domain INCLSP INCLSP*RACETH2 INCLSP*SEX INCLSP*RACETH*SEX; Preparing for AnalysisSetting up the procedure in SAS Surveymeans

32. Other data analysis issues from NHANES Calculating Population Totals • Estimates of the number of persons in the U.S. population with a particular condition must be done carefully. • Recommended procedure is to: • First, estimate the proportion with the condition for each subdomain of interest. • Mutliply that by the population control totals for that subdomain. • Tables are available on the NCHS web site with the current March 2001 CPS control totals as part of the analytic guidelines.

33. Other data analysis issues from NHANES Calculating Population Totals • Estimates of number of persons with a condition can be obtained by summing the weights of those positive. • These estimates will be less reliable due to • item non response • and sampling error • Not the recommended method.

34. Analyzing within NHANES 1999-2004 Things to consider: • Data released in two year cycles. • We STRONGLY RECOMMEND using two or more cycles (4 or more years )to produce reliable estimates. • Verify data items collected were comparable in wording and methods. • When combining years remember to use correct combined weights.

35. Analyzing trends with NHANES NHANES III to NHANES 1999-2004 Things to consider: • What is your sample from each survey–age? • How different was the question worded or the interview methods ? • How different were the lab or exam methodologies ? Cutoffs used? Definitions? • For current NHANES 1999-2004 sample sizes may be smaller depending on number of years measured - especially in sub domains • Larger sampling variation. • May need to limit comparisons.

36. Race/Ethnicity NHANES 1999-2004 Two variables available RIDRETH1 & RIDRETH2

37. Race/Ethnicity NHANES 1999-2004 Ridreth1- Use for analyses of 1999-2004 data alone. 1=Mexican American 2=other Hispanic 3=non-Hispanic white 4=non-Hispanic black 5=other races including multiracial. • For 2 and 4 years of data we know there is insufficient sample size to analyze “other Hispanics” (group 2) alone or to analyze “all Hispanics”. • Analyses to evaluate whether 6 years of data (1999-2004) are sufficient to analyze these Hispanic groups are ongoing. • Groups 2 and 5 can AND should continue to be combined to represent all other races.

38. Race/Ethnicity NHANES 1999-2004 Ridreth2 Use for analyzing trends from NHANES III to NHANES 1999-2004. Most comparable to race/ethnicity variable collected in NHANES III. Coded as : 1=non-Hispanic white 2=non-Hispanic black 3=Mexican American 4=other – including Multi-Racial 5=other Hispanic

39. Analyzing data from NHANES 1999-2004 Crude versus Age Standardized Estimates: • Age distributions within survey samples vary by racial/ethnic group. • Age distributions also vary by survey – NHANES III vs. NHANES 1999-2004. • When comparing estimates across racial/ethnic groups or between surveys you may need to age standardize. • Also present all age specific estimates!

40. Analyzing data from NHANES 1999-2004 When Age Standardizing: • Use the 2000 U.S. Census Population for consistency for both NHANES III and all NHANES 1999-2000 or above. • For guidelines and population proportions see the website below for the Klein and Schoenborn HP2010 Statistical Notes on “Age Adjustment using the 2000 Projected U.S. Population”. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statnt/statnt20.pdf

41. Analyzing data from NHANES 1999-2004 When Age Standardizing: • In SUDAAN, use the STDVAR and STDWGT statements. • STDVAR –variable name for the age groups. • STDWGT – corresponding proportion of the 2000 U.S. Census population for that age subgroup.

42. Age standardization for NHANES Crude vs. Age Standardized Estimates Example:

43. Other data analysis issues from NHANES Design Effect • Sample design effect - the ratio of the variance estimated under the complex sample design to the variance under simple random sampling Var (CSD) / Var (SRS) • SUDAAN - DEFT2 option in Proc Descript • Design effect can be averaged

44. Other data analysis issues from NHANES Effective Sample sizes • Sample sizes should be adjusted by the sample design effect (DEFF) Effective N = N/DEFF • Minimum sample size for reporting each individual estimate depends on the statistic being calculated, its relative size, stability of the SE estimate, degrees of freedom and other special circumstances. • Please refer to the Analytic Guidelines on our web site for more details.

45. Other data analysis issues from NHANESEstimate Stability Relative Standard Errors : • For estimates such as means/prevalences – calculate the relative standard error (RSE) as follows: (SE mean / mean) X 100% • For prevalence estimates near 100% (i.e. > 90%), look at the RSE for the percent negative not just percent positive. • i.e. calculate RSE for minimum p or 1-p

46. Other data analysis issues from NHANES Relative Standard Errors and “Rare” Events: • RSE’s <20%, estimates are most likely reportable. • RSE’s >30%, consider whether the estimate provides useful information. • Estimates of 50% with SE of 15% and RSE of 30% give a 95% CI’s approximately 20-80%. Is this really useful information? • Estimates of low prevalence (i.e. 5%) with SE of 1.5 also give RSE of 30% but the 95% CI is approximately 2-8%. This may be very useful information.

47. Other data analysis Issues from NHANES Confidence Limits for“rare” (>90% or <10%) events: • Standard normal approaches for calculating 95% CI’s may give lower bounds < 0 or upper bounds > 100. • Statistical literature describes alternative methods under these situations. • Evaluation of these various methods - see analytic guidelines on NCHS web site.

48. Other data analysis Issues from NHANES Degrees of freedom (DF) for t-statistics: • Must calculate the DF to obtain a correct t-statistic for calculating confidence limits. • DF are = number of clusters in the 2nd level of sampling (# PSU’s) – number of clusters in the 1st level of sampling (#strata) in your subgroup of interest. • Same for both SAS and SUDAAN when all strata and PSU’s are represented in your subgroup.

49. Other data analysis Issues from NHANES Degrees of freedom (DF) for t-statistics: • SAS and SUDAAN do not calculate DF the same way when your subgroup is NOT represented in all PSU’s and strata. • SAS is currently working on correcting this. • In SUDAAN, to calculate DF you must output the # strata and the # PSU’s using the ATLEVL1=1 and ATLEV2=2 options in your PROC Descript or PROC Crosstab

50. Analyzing Data from NHANES 1999-2004 Analytic Guidelines: • Detailed guidelines for working with NHANES data can be found at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm • This document contains everything discussed today and will continue to grow to include guidelines for statistical tests, multivariate analyses, modeling and more! • Web based tutorial also currently available and continuously being developed.