TEPPC Hydro Data Update 9/12/11
This document outlines the latest updates to the hydro data, focusing on new HTC plants and K value calculations derived from historical generation and load data across various years. The updates include additions and removals of plants based on performance metrics such as average K values and R². Significant adjustments have been made to the K values for plants in California, Northwest, and East regions for improved modeling accuracy. The document is ready for review and aims to enhance the reliability of hydrological modeling.
TEPPC Hydro Data Update 9/12/11
E N D
Presentation Transcript
TEPPC Hydro Data Update9/12/11 Christie Dennis
2005 Data Summary – Median Hydro • CA • Data set complete – ready for review • New HTC K value/p factor calculations for improved modeling • K values derived from 2002, 2003, 2005, and 2010 generation/load data • Reviewed HTC plants, cut some out based on poor K, R2 and added some • Added – King River (Average K = 2.32, Average R2 = 0.29) • Removed – Devil Canyon (Average K = 0.95 ,Average R2 = 0.19) • NW • Data set complete – ready for review • Big 4 plants • K values derived from 1999, 2001-2003, 2005-2010, adjusted for wind reserves • New HTC plants • Mossyrock, Oxbow, Pelton, Ross • East • Data set complete – ready for review • New HTC plants • Hoover, Blue Mesa • Alberta • Data set complete – ready for review • New HTC plants • Bow River, Brazeau, Bighorn
CA K value adjustments • Averaging several water years smoothes K value – lower standard deviation • 2022 – 2002, 2003, 2005, 2010 • 2020 – 2002, 2003, 2005
CA K value adjustments • Improved standard deviations in nearly all cases
NW K value adjustments • Averaging several water years smoothes K value – lower standard deviation • 2022 – 1999, 2001-2003, 2005-2010 • 2020 – 1999, 2002, 2003, 2006
NW K value adjustments • Improved standard deviations in all cases
CA HTC plants • Big Creek (K Ave = 1.21 ) • Big Creek 1, 2, 2A, 3, 4, 8; Mammoth Pool • King River (K Ave = 2.32 ) • Balch 2, Haas, Pine Flat • Mokelumne River (K Ave = 1.14 ) • Collierville, Electra, Salt Springs, Tiger Creek • North Feather River (K Ave = 1.52, 2.05 ) • Belden, Poe, Rock Creek, Butt Valley, Caribou 1 & 2 • Pit 4, JB Black (K Ave = 1.94 ) • Pit 5 (K Ave = 1.55 ) • Pit 6 & 7 (K Ave = 1.97 ) • SMUD (K Ave = 2.70 ) • Camino, Jaybird, Loon Lake, Union Valley, White Rock
NW additions, East, Alberta HTC plants • Mossyrock(K Ave = 3.52, R2 Ave = 0.47 ) • Oxbow (K Ave = 1.75, R2 Ave = 0.23 ) • Pelton(K Ave = 2.39, R2 Ave = 0.50 ) • Ross (K Ave = 2.81, R2 Ave = 0.31 ) • Hoover (K Ave = 2.69, R2 Ave = 0.45 ) • Blue Mesa (K Ave = 5.0, R2 Ave = 0.28 ) • Bow River (K Ave = 5.0, R2 Ave = 0.6 ) • Brazeau(K Ave = 6.0, R2 Ave = 0.45 ) • Bighorn (K Ave = 2.44, R2 Ave = 0.21 )
2010 Hindcast Data • CA • Aggregate data collected • EIA data collected, incomplete until sometime in the Fall • Can use aggregate/roll up methodology developed for 2005 dataset • NW • COE plant data collected and formatted • EIA plant data collected, not complete until the Fall • K values, p factors calculated • East • EIA plant data collected, not complete until the Fall • East hard data collected
2001 Data – Low Hydro • CA • No aggregate data collected • EIA data collected • No CVP data • NW • COE plant data collected • EIA/plant data collected • K values, p factors calculated • East • EIA plant data collected • Data collected from Sam Loftin