110 likes | 229 Vues
This article explores the concepts of independence and factorization within the framework of Bayesian Networks (BNs). It discusses how the factorization of a distribution over a graph implies certain independencies, focusing on d-separation as a key concept. The text delves into I-maps, independence maps of probability distributions, and the essential relationship between graphical representations and statistical independencies. Through definitions, theorems, and examples, it aims to clarify how these elements work together to facilitate the understanding of complex probabilistic models.
E N D
Representation Probabilistic Graphical Models Independencies BayesianNetworks
Independence & Factorization • Factorization of a distribution P over a graph implies independencies in P P(X,Y,Z) = P(X) P(Y) X,Y independent • P(X,Y,Z) 1(X,Y) 2(Y,Z) (X Y | Z)
d-separation in BNs Definition: X and Y are d-separated in G given Z if there is no active trail in G between X and Y given Z
d-separation examples D I G S L Any node is separated from its non-descendants givens its parents
I-maps • If P satisfies I(H), we say that H is an I-map (independency map) of P I(G) = {(X Y | Z) : d-sepG(X, Y | Z)}
I-maps P2 P1 G1 G2 D I D I
Factorization Independence: BNs Theorem: If P factorizes over G, then G is an I-map for P D I G S L
Independence Factorization Theorem: If G is an I-map for P, then P factorizes over G D I G S L
Factorization Independence: BNs • Theorem: If P factorizes over G, then G is an I-map for P D I G S L
Summary Two equivalent views of graph structure: • Factorization: G allows P to be represented • I-map: Independencies encoded by G hold in P If P factorizes over a graph G, we can read from the graph independencies that must hold in P (an independency map)