1 / 80

Pulmonary Function Testing

Pulmonary Function Testing. Sandra B. Weibel MD Thomas Jefferson University. Indications. Differential diagnosis of dyspnea Provides objective assessment of symptoms versus severity Determine fitness for surgery To guide therapy To follow the course of a disease.

mae
Télécharger la présentation

Pulmonary Function Testing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pulmonary Function Testing Sandra B. Weibel MD Thomas Jefferson University

  2. Indications • Differential diagnosis of dyspnea • Provides objective assessment of symptoms versus severity • Determine fitness for surgery • To guide therapy • To follow the course of a disease

  3. Physiologic classification of disease • Obstructive Impairment- Airway limitation due to the resistive properties of the respiratory system • Restrictive Impairment- Loss of volume capacity of the lung due to loss of air space units or inability to expand the respiratory system

  4. Obstructive Processes • L ocal obstruction • A sthma • C hronic bronchitis (COPD) • E mphysema

  5. Restrictive Processes • P leural disease • A lveolar filling processes • I nterstial lung disease • N euromuscular diseases • T horacic cage abnormailites

  6. Spirometry • Most widely performed study and is important in initial screening of patients • Easily and quickly performed in many settings

  7. Types of spirometers • Types include flow (pneumotach) or volume (water seal, rolling and diaphragm) • Water seal device previoisly most commonly used in pulmonary function labs of the volume • Collect exhaled gas and act as a reservoir for inhaled gas • Composed of a mouthpiece, bell system and a pen on a rotating drum

  8. Volume Displacement Spirometer

  9. Flow Spirometry

  10. Calibration of spirometer • Warmed up and temperature controlled Barometric pressure and temperature recorded • Volume calibration with 3L syringe (within 3%) • Flow spirometer tested at 3 flow rates between 2 and 12L

  11. Quality Control

  12. Prior to testing

  13. Performing the maneuver • It is a forced expiratory maneuver and the patient must be sitting upright in a chair with lips around a mouthpiece • After a maximal inspiration, a forced and rapid expiration is made • Quality of the maneuver needs to be assessed noting that the patient started at zero, had a maximal initial efffort and lasted 6 seconds.

  14. Measurements • FVC • FEV1 • FEV1/FVC • Also FEF25-75 and TET

  15. FVC Measurement

  16. FEV1 Measurement

  17. Flow volume

  18. Interpretation • First need to assess the quality of the maneuvers • Choice of reference values • Use of LLN • Compare to previous tests • Race adjustments

  19. Restrictive Lung FVC AND FEV1 decreased FEV1/FVC normal FEV1 main distinguishing feature Obstruction FEV1 decreased FVC Normal FEV1/FVC are low Interpretation

  20. Pitfalls in Interpretation • Predicted need to fit your population • Non Caucasians have lower lung volumes and this may need to be addressed • Prior to interpretation the test needs to be assessed to see if it meets standards • Machines need to be calibrated daily to ensure accuracy

  21. Effort

  22. Poor effort

  23. Interpretation • The patient’s data is compared to predicted • Predicted values are obtained after studying populations of normal nonsmokers and then regression equations developed • Regressions are based on sex, height, and age.

  24. Predicted Values

  25. Decline in PFTS

  26. References • Many different ones used in past Knudson Crapo etc • Current recommendation is NHANES III • This studied over 7000 individuals • Included Caucasians, blacks and Mexican Americans

  27. Interpretaion • Normal is > 80% of predicted • Mild impairment 65-79% • Moderate 50 -64% • Severe < 50%

  28. Interpretations

  29. Flow Volume Loops • Inspiratory loops can also be obtained to evaluate for the presence of large airway obstruction • Theory changes in pressure outside and inside the thoracic cage will cause changes in airway diameter • These airway changes can cause a limitation to airflow if large enough

  30. Extrathoracic Obstruction

  31. Intrathoracic Obstruction

  32. Fixed Obstruction

  33. Large Airway Obstruction

  34. Bronchodilator Response

  35. Bronchodilator testing • No short acting agents for 4 hrs • No long acting beta agonists for 12 hrs • No theo for 12 hrs • No smoking for 1 hr • Beta agonist given recommended 4 puffs and wait 10-15 minutes later

More Related