1 / 37

COMPASS plans to measure GPDs

COMPASS plans to measure GPDs. The COMPASS experiment GPDs at COMPASS now: deep r production ≥2010: DVCS and HEMP. Jean-Marc Le Goff DAPNIA/CEA-Saclay 24 Feb 2006, Albuquerque workshop on Orbital Angular Momentum. The COMPASS experiment.

mircea
Télécharger la présentation

COMPASS plans to measure GPDs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. COMPASS plans to measure GPDs • The COMPASS experiment • GPDs at COMPASS • now: deep r production • ≥2010: DVCS and HEMP Jean-Marc Le Goff DAPNIA/CEA-Saclay 24 Feb 2006, Albuquerque workshop on Orbital Angular Momentum

  2. The COMPASS experiment

  3. The COMPASS Collaboration(230 Physicists from 12 Countries) Bielefeld, Bochum, Bonn (ISKP & PI), Erlangen, Freiburg, Heidelberg, Mainz, München (LMU & TU) Dubna (LPP and LNP), Moscow (INR, LPI, State University), Protvino CERN Warsaw (SINS), Warsaw (TU) Helsinki Prag Nagoya CEA-Saclay Lisboa Torino(University,INFN), Trieste(University,INFN) Burdwan, Calcutta Tel Aviv

  4. COMPASS fixed target experiment at CERN muons hadrons π/K, p Beam: 2 . 108 µ+/ spill (4.8s / 16.2s) 2 . 108 h/spill Beam polarisation: 80% Beam momentum: 160 GeV/c 150-270 GeV/c COMPASS SPS LHC COMPASS  COmmon Muon and Proton Apparatus for Structure andSpectroscopy

  5. muon beam nucleon spin structure • Quark and Gluon Polarization in (longitudinally) polarized nucleons • transverse spin distribution function Tq(x) • Flavor dependent polarized quark helicity densities q(x) • Lambda polarisation • Diffractive vector-meson production Physics goals hadron beams nucleon spectroscopy • Primakoff-Reactions • polarizability of  and K • Exotics: glueballs and hybrids • charmed mesons and baryons • semi-leptonic decays • double-charmed baryons

  6. Spectrometer 2002  2004 trigger-hodoscopes DW45 straws SM2 dipole Muon-filter2,MW2 HCAL1 RICH_1 Gem_11 SM1 dipole ECAL2,HCAL2 MWPC Gems Scifi Polarised Target Muon-filter1,MW1 Veto straws,MWPC,Gems,SciFi Gems,SciFi,DCs,straws Silicon SciFi Micromegas,DC,SciFi BMS

  7. COMPASS and GPDs

  8. measurement of GPDs γ* Q2 γ x +ξ x -ξ GPDs p p’ t =Δ2 Q2 meson Q2 γ* γ* L L L hard x +ξ x -ξ x -ξ x +ξ soft GPDs GPDs p p’ p p’ t =Δ2 Gluon contribution Collins et al. Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering (DVCS): γ* γ Q2 hard x +ξ x -ξ soft GPDs Q2 large t << Q2 + γ* p p’ t =Δ2 Hard Exclusive Meson Production (HEMP): meson L t =Δ2 Quark contribution

  9. Complementarity of experiments E=190, 100GeV At fixed xBj, study in Q2 Valence and sea quarks and Gluons Valence quarks 0.0001< xBj < 0.01 Gluons HermesPRL87(2001) COMPASS plans JLab PRL87(2001) H1 and ZEUS PLB517(2001) PLB573(2003)

  10. if Nμ 5  Q2 < 17 GeV2 Benefit of a higher muon intensity for GPDs study E=190, 100GeV if Nμ 2  Q2 < 11 GeV2 DVCS limited by luminosity now Nμ= 2.108μ /SPS spill Q2 < 7.5 GeV2  At fixed xBj, study in Q2

  11. m flux at COMPASS in 2010 ?  sharing CNGS/FT  new Linac 4  up to 10 times more p +improve m line COMPASS >>LINAC4 From Lau Gatignon

  12. What can we measure now ?

  13. DVCS, HEMP ? 1/Q6 1/Q4 vector mesonspseudo-scalar • sDVCS small, bckg • HEMP factorization: gL • vector meson decay •  R=sT/sL • ρ0 largest s • ρ0 π+ π- , charged particules Vanderhagen et al.:

  14. Diffractive r0 production μN μ’N’ρ * π+π- Q 2 W N’ N t • Exp (NMC, E665, Zeus, H1, Hermes): • lr ≈ lg S-channel helicity conservation SCHC • exchanged object has natural parity : P=(-1)JNPE

  15. Spin properties of amplitudes • angular dist. of ρ  π+π- : spin density matrix elt • they are bilinear combinations of • helicity amplitudes : • λγ=  1, 0 λρ=  1, 0  9 amplitudes • if NPE  5 amplitudes • T00, T11 >> T01, T10 >> T-11 • SCHC 1 helicity flip 2 flips

  16. r spin density matrix elt 04 00 0.01 < Q² < 0.05 < Q² < 0.3 < Q² < 0.6 < Q² < 2.0 < Q² < 10 GeV2 Distribution : in terms of amplitudes:

  17. Determination of R=sL/sT 2002 2003 + 2004 • If SCHC holds : • sL is dominant at Q2>2 • 2002: high stat • in large Q2 range • 2003 and 2004 data : • - much more stat • - better high Q2coverage

  18. Conclusions on rho • SCHC → R • stot + R → sL • when Q2 > 2 → R > 1 : accurate sL • we have transv. target spin asym → E/H • important for Ji sum rule (∫E+H) • exploratory measurement • (no exclusivity, nuclear target)

  19. Towards a dedicated experiment for DVCS and HEMP

  20. Additions to COMPASS setup μ’ + additional calorimeter at larger angle Recoil detector to insure exclusivity to be designed and built p’ μ 2.5m liquid H2 target to be designed and built L = 1.3 1032 cm-2 s-1  ECal 1 or 2   12° Exclusivity: at high energy dDM2 = d[(mp+mπ)2-mp2] > 1 GeV2 need 0.25 GeV2 for DM cut  hermetic detector

  21. A possible solution 30° ECAL0 12° 4m 2004-2007: Funding by European Union (Bonn-Mainz-Warsaw-Saclay) 45° sector recoil detector - scintillating material studies (200ps ToF Resolution over 4m) - fast triggering and multi-hit ADC/TDC system

  22. DVCS background • not included: • Beam halo • with hadronic contamination • Beam pile-up • Secondary interactions • External Bremsstrahlung • DVCS: μp  μp • with PYTHIA 6.1 simulate: • HEπ°P: μp  μpπ° •   • Dissociation of the proton: • μp  μN*π° •  Nπ • DIS: μp μpX • with 1, 1π°, 2π°,η… • Acceptance cuts: • qgmax= 30° • Egmin= 50 MeV • qchargedmax= 30°

  23. g* γ x +ξ x -ξ TDVCS: GPDs p p’ t =Δ2 GPD measurement • xxB/(2-xB) and t are fixed • loop over x

  24. DVCS + Bethe-heitler μ μ p p  μ’ * θ μ p φ BH calculable Higher energy: DVCS>>BH  DVCS Cross section • Smaller energy: DVCS~BH • Interference term will provide the DVCS amplitude

  25. dσ(μpμp) = dσBH + dσDVCSunpol + PμdσDVCSpol + eμaBHReADVCS + eμ PμaBHImADVCS μ’ * θ μ p φ  cos nφ sin nφ DVCS + BH with and . Pμ+=-0.8 Pμ-=+0.8 t, ξ~xBj/2 fixed

  26. at 100 GeV BCA Q2=40.5 GeV2 x = 0.05 ± 0.02 Model 1: H(x,0,t) ~ q(x) F(t) Model 2: H(x,0,t) = q(x) e t <b2> = q(x) / xα’t • assuming: • L = 1.3 1032 cm-2 s-1 • 150 days • efficiency=25% • 2 bins shown out of 18: • 3 bins in xBj= 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 • 6 bins in Q2 from 2 to 7 GeV2 φ φ BCA x = 0.10 ± 0.03 φ

  27. model 1 model 2 COMPASS advantage of COMPASS kinematics Model 1: H(x,0,t) ~ q(x) F(t) Model 2: H(x,0,t) = q(x) e t <b2> = q(x) / xα’t sensitive to different spatial distributions at different x

  28. HEMP: filter of GPDs Cross section: Vector meson production (ρ,ω,…) H & E Pseudo-scalar production (π,η…) H & E ~ ~ Hρ0 = 1/2 (2/3Hu + 1/3Hd + 3/8Hg) Hω= 1/2 (2/3Hu – 1/3Hd + 1/8Hg) H = -1/3Hs - 1/8Hg Transverse single spin asymmetry : ~ E/H

  29. HEMP in 2010 • HEMP requires higher Q2 than DVCS • with liq H target and same m flux as now: • r  Q2= 20 GeV2 • w, p, h, f  Q2= 7 GeV2 • if more m  higher Q2

  30. Roadmap for DVCS at COMPASS • 2004-2009: r production: sL and transverse spin asym • 2005 :"Expression of Interest": SPSC-E0I-005 • 2004-2007: recoil detector prototype • 2008 ? : proposal • 2007-2009:construction of the recoil detector • cryogenic target, ECal0 • 2010: dedicated GPD measurement

  31. Measure OAM ? • Ji sum rule relates total quark spin to GPDs H and E : • similar sum rule for gluons • To do : • Measure H and E • Perform flavor decomposition • Extrapolate to t=0 • Integrate over x at fixed x • Sivers asymmetries are also measured at COMPASS

  32. SPARE

  33. Key role of calorimetry ECAL2 from 0.4 to 2°: mainly lead glass GAMS ECAL1 from 2 to 12° : good energy and position resolution for 2-g separation in a high rate environment ECAL0 from 12 to 30°: to be designed for background rejection Careful study of g and π0 production  COMPASS program with hadron beam

  34. ρ° angular distributions W(cosθ, φ, Φ) depends on theSpin density matrix elements 23 (15) observables with polarized (unpolarized) beam φ This analysis: only one-dimensional angular distribution We will use also: ψ= φ - Φ

  35. 0.01 < Q² < 0.05 < Q² < 0.3 < Q² < 0.6 < Q² < 2.0 < Q² Angular distributions 0.01 < Q² < 0.05 < Q² < 0.3 < Q² < 0.6 < Q² < 2.0 < Q² < 10 GeV2 φ Preliminary : - Corrected for Acceptance, smearing and efficiency (MC:DIPSI gen) - Background not subtracted Statistical error only, limited by MC

  36. Measurement of r and Im r 04 1-1 3 1-1 φ Distribution : beam polarisation weak violation Spin density matrices: If SCHC holds

  37. COMPASS 6 angular distributions among 18: 3 bins in xBj=0.05, 0.1, 0.2 6 bins in Q2 from 2 to 7 GeV2 BCA in DVCS projections for 1 year HERMES one single bin <x>=0.11 <Q2>=2.6

More Related