1 / 29

Family Interactions

Family Interactions. Margaret Jarvis, MD Marworth Geisinger Health System. Family Disease?. Some concern for pathologizing family’s response to identified patient’s disease. What is a family?. Love (agape) : The willingness to act in a caring way even when you don’t feel like it

mschwarz
Télécharger la présentation

Family Interactions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Family Interactions Margaret Jarvis, MD Marworth Geisinger Health System

  2. Family Disease? • Some concern for pathologizing family’s response to identified patient’s disease

  3. What is a family? • Love (agape) : • The willingness to act in a caring way even when you don’t feel like it • Recognition of self, other and the coupleship as distinct entities and willingness to be loving to all

  4. What is a family? • Needs of the relationship (coupleship) need to come first • Needs of the children need to come first

  5. Family disease? • In addiction, the needs of the addiction always comes first

  6. Family disease? • Addiction is disease of chaos and dysfunction • Family members attempt to re-establish function • Love and caring • Sense of normalcy/homeostasis

  7. Family disease? • Over time, behaviors of family members altered or driven in reaction to the addiction • Family members behaviors toward the addicted member are addictive in themselves • Preoccupation to the neglect of other concerns • Shame

  8. Change in human systems • Generally, humans only change in response to pain • Change will occur when the pain is great enough • Enabling systems prevent the identified patient from experiencing pain • Family members may prevent pain in one another if it threatens the stability of the system

  9. Change in humans • The family (and the individuals) will be healthier for every pain it feels and grows through

  10. How to address the family • System to achieve abstinence • Treatment or external control • Very initial stabilization • System to maintain abstinence • Education about effect of disease on member’s behaviors • Contract between addicted person and family about expectations

  11. How to address the family • Contract may include graduated steps of treatment/intervention as responses to relapses • Contract to include agreement that family members get some attention (professional or 12 –step)

  12. How to address the family • Even in face of relapses, work with the family (without the addicted person) can continue • Extended support needed – keep energy off of addicted person (and therapist!)

  13. How to address the family • Assessment of identified patient as usual • Assessment of family includes • other member’s use histories • Family’s responses to intoxicated and sober behaviors

  14. Family Roles • Classic system of naming typical responses to disease • All the roles: • Are rigidly held and are reinforced by other family members • Enable denial of alcoholism • Allow family to function as a unit, allows some individual function but NOT FULL HEALTH

  15. Family Roles • Caretaker: usually adult, sometimes child – loses self in caring for others • Hero – usually child who excels • Reinforcement for achievement leads to narcissism • Scapegoat – usually child identified as a problem • Carries the shame for the family

  16. Family Roles • Mascot – creates diversion away from alcoholism. Usually a child. • Lost child – usually a child, is low maintenance

  17. How does the FOO predict kids’ use? • Suburban, higher SES: • Parents more tolerant of drug use than of other non-acceptable behaviors • Parents REALLY knowing what kids were doing/where/with whom decreased use • “Containment” – predictable consequences for behavior reduced use Luthar et al., 2008

  18. How does the FOO predict kids’ use? • Low SES: • Boys who have higher use later (20’s-30’s) • Higher alcohol use age 16 • Lower achievement scores age 12 • Maternal use age 16 • Externalizing behaviors age 9 England, et al., 2008

  19. How does the FOO predict kids’ use? • Low SES • Girls who use more later (20’s to 30’s): • Drinking more age 16 • Higher achievement age 12 England, et al., 2008

  20. How does the FOO predict kids’ use? • Urban African American • Both boys and girls: in families with more rules about drug/alcohol use, less likely to initiate tobacco or alcohol Doherty, et al., 2007

  21. How does the FOO predict kids’ use? • Urban African American • Boys and marijuana: • More likely to use than girls (1.5x) • Female-headed household and rule-setting affect use • Girls and marijuana: • Family cohesion reduces risk Doherty, et al., 2007

  22. How does the FOO predict kids’ use? • Urban African American • Both genders: • Physical and frequent discipline early increases heroin and cocaine • Maternal substance use increases heroin and cocaine • Girls: • More rules about drug use reduces risk of heroin and cocaine Doherty, et at., 2007

  23. How do genetics contribute? • Unequivocal human and animal data to say there is a big genetic contribution (50-60% of variance) • Multi-gene

  24. What genes might contribute? • Glutamate receptor genes (alcohol) • Cannabanoid receptor gene (nicotine) • Taq1 (alcohol, all addictions) – D2 receptor deficiency • ALD AST (alcohol) • NO ONE GENE DOES IT ALL

  25. How do genetics contribute? • For initiation and early patterns of use of alcohol, cannabis, nicotine: • Family and environmental effects more important in early life • Genetic effects more influential later Kendler, et al. Arch Gen Psych, 2008

  26. References • E.E. Doherty, K. M. Green, H.S Reisinger, M.E. Ensminger. Long-term patterns of drug use among an urban African-American cohort: the role of gender and family Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 85:2, 2007 • M.M. Englund, B. Egeland, E. M. Olivia, W. A. Collins. Childhood and adolescent predictors of heavy drinking and alcohol use disorders in early adulthood: a longitudinal developmental analysis. Addiction103:supp. 1, 2008 • S.S. Luthar, A.S. Goldstein. Substance use and related behaviors among suburban late adolescents: The importance of perceived parent containment Development and Psychopathology 20, 2008

  27. References • Kendler, K.S., E. Schmitt, S.H. Aggren, C. A. Prescott. Genetic and environmental influences on alcohol, caffeine and nicotine use from early adolescence to middle adulthood. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65:674-682.

More Related