1 / 44

PART 2

PART 2. The LHC physics programme. Search for Standard Model Higgs boson over ~ 120 < m H < 1000 GeV. Search for Supersymmetry and other physics beyond the SM (q/  compositness, leptoquarks, W’/Z’, heavy q/ , unpredicted ? ….) up to masses of ~ 5 TeV

niabi
Télécharger la présentation

PART 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PART 2

  2. The LHC physics programme • Search for Standard Model Higgs boson • over ~ 120 < mH < 1000 GeV. • Search for Supersymmetry and other physics • beyond the SM (q/ compositness, leptoquarks, • W’/Z’, heavy q/, unpredicted ? ….) up to • masses of ~ 5 TeV • Precise measurements : • -- W mass • -- WW, WWZ Triple Gauge Couplings • -- topmass, couplings and decay properties • -- Higgs mass, spin, couplings (if Higgs found) • -- B-physics: CP violation, rare decays, B0 • oscillations (ATLAS, CMS, LHCb) • -- QCD jet cross-section and as • -- etc. …. • Study of phase transition at high density from • hadronic matter to plasma of deconfined quarks • and gluons. Transition plasma  hadronic matter • happened in universe ~ 10-5 s after Big Bang • (ALICE)

  3. Process Events/sEvents/yearOther machines (total statistics) W e 15 108 104 LEP / 107 Tev. Z ee 1.5107107 LEP 0.8107104 Tevatron 1051012108 Belle/BaBar 0.001104 (m=1 TeV) H 0.001104 (m=0.8 TeV) QCD jets 102 109107 pT > 200 GeV Keyword: large event statistics Expected event rates in ATLAS/CMS for representative (known and new) physics processes at low luminosity (L=1033 cm-2 s-1) High L : statistics 10 times larger  LHC is a B-factory,top factory, W/Z factory Higgs factory, SUSY factory, etc….

  4. Precise measurements of: mW , mtop

  5. Electromagnetic constant measured in atomic transitions, e+e- machines, etc. Fermi constant measured in muon decay radiative corrections r ~ f (mtop2, log mH) r  3% Weinberg angle measured at LEP/SLC Motivation: W mass and top mass are fundamental parameters of the Standard Model:  since GF, aEM, sinW are known with high precision, precise measurements of mtop and mW constrain radiative corrections and Higgs mass (weakly because of logarithmic dependence) So far : W mass measured at LEP2 and Tevatron top mass measured at the Tevatron

  6. 4•10-4 Direct measurements mH dependence in SM through radiative corrections 3% mW (from LEP2 + Tevatron) = 80.450  0.034 GeV mtop (from Tevatron) = 174.3  5.1 GeV light Higgs is favoured

  7. Year 2007: DmW  25 MeV (0.3 ‰)from LEP/Tevatron Dmtop  2 GeV (1%)from Tevatron Can LHC do better ? YES : thanks to large statistics

  8. Measurement of W mass Method used at hadron collidersdifferent from e+e- colliders • W  jet jet : cannot be extracted from QCD • jet-jet production  cannot be used • W  tn : since t  n + X , too many undetected • neutrinos  cannot be used onlyW  en and W mndecays are used to measure mW at hadron colliders

  9. q  W n s (pp  W + X)  30 nb e, mn ~ 300  106 events produced ~ 60  106 events selected after analysis cuts one year at low L, per experiment W production at LHC : Ex. q’ ~ 50 times larger statistics than at Tevatron ~ 6000 times larger statistics than WW at LEP

  10. W en events (data) from CDF experiment at the Tevatron

  11. Since not known (only can be measured through ETmiss), measure transverse mass, i.e. invariant mass of  in plane perpendicular to the beam :  ETmiss

  12. mW= 79.8 GeV mW= 80.3 GeV mTW (GeV) mTW distribution is sensitive to mW mTW distribution expected in ATLAS  fit experimental distributions with SM prediction (Monte Carlo simulation) for different values of mW  find mW which best fits data

  13. Uncertainties on mW • Come mainly from capability of Monte Carlo • prediction to reproduce real life, that is: • detector performance: energy resolution, • energy scale, etc. • physics: pTW, W, GW, backgrounds, etc. Dominant error (today at Tevatron,most likely also at LHC): knowledge of lepton energy scale of the detector: if measurement of lepton energy wrong by 1%, then measured mW wrong by 1%

  14. e- beam CALO E = 100 GeV Emeasured Calibration of detector energy scale Example : EM calorimeter • if Emeasured = 100.000 GeV calorimeter is • perfectly calibrated • if Emeasured = 99, 101 GeV  energy scale • known to 1% • to measure mW to ~ 20 MeV need to • know energy scale to0.2 ‰, i.e. • if E electron = 100 GeV then • 99.98 GeV < Emeasured < 100.02 GeV  one of most serious experimental challenges

  15. in in cell out • calorimeter modules calibrated with test beams • of known energy set the energy scale • inside LHC detectors: calorimeter sits behind • inner detector  electrons lose energy in • material of inner detector  need a final • calibration “ in situ ” by using physics samples: • e.g. Z  e+ e- decays 1/sec at low L • constrain mee = mZ known to  10-5 from LEP reconstructed Calibration strategy: • detectors equipped with calibration systems • which inject known pulses:  check that all cells give same response: if not  correct

  16. Source of uncertainty DmW Statistical error << 2 MeV Physics uncertainties ~ 15 MeV (pTW, W, GW, …) Detector performance < 10 MeV (energy resolution, lepton identification, etc,) Energy scale 15 MeV Total ~ 25 MeV (per experiment, per channel) Expected precision on mW at LHC Combining both channels (en, mn) and both experiments (ATLAS, CMS), DmW 15 MeV should be achieved. However: very difficult measurement

  17. tt  b bjj events -- u c t d s b Dm (t-b)  170 GeV  radiative corrections S+B B Measurement of mtop • Top is most intriguing fermion: • -- mtop  174 GeV  clues about origin of particle masses ? • Discovered in ‘94 at Tevatron precise • measurements of mass, couplings, etc. • just started Top mass spectrum from CDF

  18. t g t q g t t q s (pp  + X)  800 pb 107 pairs produced in one year at low L measure mtop, stt, BR, Vtb, single top, rare decays (e.g. t  Zc), resonances, etc. production is the main background to new physics (SUSY, Higgs) Top production at LHC: e.g. ~ 102 times more than at Tevatron

  19. W t b Top decays: BR  100% in SM -- hadronic channel: both W  jj  6 jet finalstates. BR  50 % but large QCD multijet background. -- leptonic channel: both W    2 jets + 2 + ETmiss final states. BR  10 %. Little kinematic constraints to reconstruct mass. -- semileptonic channel: one W  jj , oneW    4 jets + 1 + ETmiss final states. BR  40 %. If  = e, m : gold-plated channel for mass measurement at hadron colliders. In all cases two jets are b-jets  displaced vertices in the inner detector

  20. Example from CDF : tt  Wb Wb  b bjj event W- , m = 79 GeV (b) W+ ATLAS e+ Jet 4 (b)  t  bjj Selection : -- two b-tagged jets -- one lepton -- ETmiss > 20 GeV -- two more jets with |mjj-mW| < 20 GeV l1=4.5 mm l2=2.2mm • Secondary vertices • (b-hadrons) ~ 1.5 ps  decay at few mm from primary vertex detected with high-granularity Si detector (b-tagging)

  21. Source of uncertainty Dmtop Statistical error << 100 MeV Physics uncertainties ~ 1.3 GeV (background, FSR, ISR, fragmentation, etc. ) Jet scale (b-jets, light-quark jets) ~ 0.8 GeV Total ~ 1.5 GeV (per experiment, per channel) Expected precision on mtop at LHC • Uncertainty dominated by the knowledge of physics • and not of detector. • By combining both experiments and all channels : • Dmtop ~ 1 GeV at LHC FromDmtop ~ 1 GeV, DmW ~ 15 MeV  indirect measurement DmH/mH ~ 25% (today ~ 50%) If / when Higgs discovered, comparison of measured mH with indirect measurement will be essential consistency checks of EWSB

  22. Searches for the Standard Model Higgs boson Where is the Higgs ?

  23. Best fit of SM to data (minimum 2) found for mH= 81+52GeV -33 What do we know today about it ? • Needed in SM to generate particle masses • Mass not predicted by theory except that mH < 1000 GeV • mH > 114.4 GeV from direct searches at LEP • Indirect limits from fit of SM to: • -- LEP1/SLD precise measurements at s = mZ • -- mW measurement LEP2/Tevatron • -- mtop measurement at Tevatron mH < 193 GeV 95% C.L.  Higgs could be around the corner ! •  1.7  excess from LEP for mH ~ 115 GeV • Higgs production and decays versus mH predicted

  24. Higgs production at LHC gg fusion WW/ZZ fusion associated WH, ZH associated Cross-section for pp  H + X

  25. H f ~ mf Higgs decays Decay branching ratios(BR) • mH < 130 GeV: H  dominates • mH  130 GeV : H  WW(*), ZZ(*) dominate • importantrare decays : H   • Dominant fully hadronic final states (inclusive H bb, • H WW  4jets, H ZZ  4jets) cannot be extracted • from QCD background  look for H , H  ZZ  4, • HWW , etc.

  26. peak width due to detector resolution mgg NS= number of signal events NB= number of background events in peak region How can one claim a discovery ? Suppose a new narrow particleX  gg is produced: Signal significance : NB error on number of background events S > 5 : signal is larger than 5 times error on background. Probability that background fluctuates up by more than 5s : 10-7 discovery

  27.  NB increases by ~ 2 (assuming background flat) NS unchanged  S =NS/NB decreases by 2 Two critical parameters to maximise S: • detector resolution: • if sm increases by e.g. two, then need to enlarge • peak region by two.  S 1 /sm detector with better resolution has larger probability to find a signal Note: only valid if GH << sm. If Higgs is broad detector resolution is not relevant. GH ~ mH3 GH ~ MeV (~100 GeV) mH =100 (600) GeV • integrated luminosity : NS ~ L NB ~ L  S ~ L

  28. g H W* W* W* g mH 150 GeV H  gg s BR  50 fb mH  100 GeV • Select events with two photons in the detector • with pT ~ 50 GeV • Measure energy and direction of each photon • Measure invariant mass of photon pair • Plot distribution of mgg Higgs should appear • as a peak at mH Most challenging channel for LHC electromagnetic calorimeters

  29. q g g q g g g g q g ~ 108 g g (s) q p0 Main backgrounds: • gg production: irreducible (i.e. same final • state as signal) e.g. :  60 mgg ~ 100 GeV • g jet + jet jet productionwhere • one/two jets fake photons: reducible e.g. :

  30. Reducible gjet, jet-jet background : need excellent g/jet separation (in particular g/p0 separation) to reject jet faking  ATLAS EM calorimeter : 4 mm strips in first compartment Rjet 103 achieved for eg  80% Adequate to reject this background well below  irreducible backgund

  31. energy resolution of EM calorimeter resolution of the measurement of the g angle  • Irreducible gg :cannot be reduced. But signal • can be extracted from background if mass • resolution good enough GH < 10 MeV for mH ~ 100 GeV

  32. vertex spread ~ 5.6 cm • ATLAS EM calorimeter: • liquid-argon/lead sampling calorimeter • longitudinal segmentation •  can measure g direction sm 1.3 GeV mH ~100 GeV e 30% • CMS EM calorimeter: • homogeneous crystal calorimeter • no longitudinal segmentation  vertex measured using • secondary tracks from spectator partons  difficult • at high L  often pick up the wrong vertex e 20% sm 0.7 GeV mH ~100 GeV • similar significance of both experiments within ~ 10% S ~ 1/m S ~ 

  33. CMS crystal calorimeter

  34. mH (GeV) 120 150 Significance ~ 6.5 ~ 4.5 per experiment with 100 fb-1 Expected performance 100 fb-1 CMS

  35. e, m Z(*) H e, m Z mZ e, m H  ZZ(*)  4  120  mH < 700 GeV e, m • “Gold-plated”channel for Higgs discovery • at LHC • Select events with 4 high-pT leptons (t excluded): • e+e- e+e-, m+m- m+m-, e+e-m+m- • Require at least one lepton pair consistent with • Z mass • Plot 4 invariant mass distribution :  Higgs signal should appear as peak in the mass distribution

  36. W t , t n b  g b  Z  g  b Backgrounds: -- irreducible : pp  ZZ (*)  4 sm (H  4) 1-1.5 GeV ATLAS, CMS For mH > 300 GeV GH > sm --reducible (s ~ 100 fb) :   Both rejected by asking: -- m ~ mZ -- leptons are isolated -- leptons come from interaction vertex ( B lifetime : ~ 1.5 ps  leptons from B produced at  1 mm from vertex)

  37. H  ZZ*  4 ATLAS, 30 fb-1 Expected performance • Significance : 3-25(depending on mass) • for 30 fb-1 • Observation possibleup to mH 700 GeV • For larger masses: • --s (pp  H) decreases • --GH > 100 GeV

  38. Summary of Standard Model Higgs Expected significance for one experiment over mass range  1 TeV • LHC can discover SM Higgs over full mass • region (S > 5) after  2 years of operation • in most regions more than one channel is available • detector performance (coverage, energy/momentum • resolution, particle identification, etc.) crucial in • most cases • if Higgs found, then mass can be measured • to 1‰ for mH < 600 GeV

  39. L is per experiment 5s LEP2 -- SM Higgs boson can be discovered at  5  with 10 fb-1/ experiment (nominally one year at 1033 cm-2 s-1) for mH  130 GeV -- Discovery faster for larger masses -- Whole mass range can be excluded at 95% CL after ~1 month of running at 1033 cm-2 s-1. However, it will take time to operate, understand, calibrate ATLAS and CMS

  40. What about Tevatron ? see lectures by F.Bedeschi • For mH ~ 115 GeV Tevatron needs (optimistic scenario): • ~ 2 fb-1 for 95% C.L. exclusion  2003-2004 ? • ~ 5 fb-1 for 3 obervation  2004-2005 ? • ~ 15 fb-1 for 5 discovery  end 2007 – beg 2008? • Discovery possible up to mH ~120 GeV • 95% C.L. exclusion possible up to mH ~185 GeV

  41. LHCversus TEVATRON Higgs cross-section ~10-100 higherS/B ~ 5 higher Conservative estimatesLess conservative predictions (cross-sections, cut analyis, etc.) (e.g. Neural Network analysis) mH=115 GeV 10 fb-1 S/B  4.7mH=115 GeV 10 fb-1 S/B  5.3 4.7  7 using Tevatron approach Will take lot of time to understandHas lot of time to understand detectors and physicsdetectors and physics Ready in 2007 ?15 fb-1 by 2008? Need 3 * For mH > 120 GeV the LHC has no competition 2008 Both machines (Tevatron, LHC) could achieve 5 discovery if mH  115 GeV. Who will find it first ?

  42. End of Part 2 Summary of Part 2 • Examples of precision physics at LHC: W mass can be • measured to ~15 MeV, top mass to ~ 1 GeV •  Higgs mass constrained indirectly to ~ 25% • Standard Model Higgs bosoncan be discovered over • the full mass region upto 1 TeV in ~ 1 year of operation. •  final word about SM Higgs mechanism • Excellent detector performance required: •  Higgs searches have driven the LHC detector design. • Among main channels : H  gg, H  4 • If SM Higgs not found before/at LHC, then alternative methods • for Electroweak Symmetry Breaking will have to be found

More Related