slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Point Prevalence vs. Period Prevalence PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Point Prevalence vs. Period Prevalence

Point Prevalence vs. Period Prevalence

790 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Point Prevalence vs. Period Prevalence

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. CDC Site Visit at EmoryCHD Surveillance Cooperative Agreement Data Analysis:Point vs. Period Prevalence & Capture-RecaptureSeptember 25, 2013Carol Hogue, PhD, MPHCheryl Raskind-Hood, MS, MPH

  2. Point Prevalence vs. Period Prevalence For a given interval, the period prevalence equals the point prevalence at the beginning of the interval plus the incidence (new cases) during the interval. • Point Prevalence: How much CHD is present in the population at a particular point in time or date? # CHD cases on a specific date / # of people in the population on this date • Period Prevalence: How much CHD is present in the population over a period of time? # CHD cases over a specific time period / # of people in the population during same time period • For instance, it’s calculated same as point prevalence, except the numerator is the # of people who had CHD at any time during a specified time period e.g., 2008-2010. • When comparing prevalence rates: • Need to ensure that the length of the time period is the same. You cannot compared a point prevalence on Jan 1, 2010 with a period prevalence for 2008-2010. • Prevalence rates may be compared among different diseases or populations as long as the same length of time is used.

  3. “Correcting” Estimates • Virtually all CHD healthcare for five-county residents will be included in one or more data captures • Possible to conduct “capture / re-capture” analyses to estimate missing cases not under care • For example, ResDAC with clinic records

  4. Simple Capture/Recapture Model • From Sekar & Deming (1949)* originally developed to estimate births and deaths in India • Estimate the number (Y) of adolescent/adult CHD cases not found in either clinic (A) or Medicaid (B) systems by Y = (A1B1)/C Where: C = cases recorded in both systems A1 = cases recorded in clinic records only B1 = cases recorded in Medicaid only *Sekar CC, Deming WE. On a method of estimating birth and death rates and the extent of registration. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1949;44(245):101-115.

  5. Capture-RecaptureMethodology Cases of CHD found in both datasets Cases of CHD found in Adolescent dataset only MACDP Yes No 1653 Yes 423 Adolescent CHD db x No 93 Cases of CHD found in MACDP dataset only Missed Cases of CHD estimated to equal b*c / a i.e., 423*93/1653 = 24 Total estimated CHD cases (a+b+c+d) = 2193

  6. Point Estimate (N) of the Total Number of Prevalent Cases of Adolescent and Adult CHD N = A1 + B1 + C + (A1B1/C) Approximate estimate of the variance, V(N) is given by: V(N) = Nq1q2/p1p2 Where p1 = C+A1/N; p2 = C+B1/N and p1 + q1 = p2 + q2 = 1

  7. Modeling Capture/Recapture • Loglinearmodels to estimate the prevalence can account for the probability of being on a given list varying from individual to individual through interaction terms. • When the models are analyzed within socioeconomic or racial / ethnic categories (e.g., age & race / ethnicity), this analytic strategy can also be used to estimate disparities in healthcare.

  8. Capture/Recapture EstimationDatasets Available for Prevalence Estimate * Corrected for deaths from NDI ** Partially corrected for deaths from NDI *** For special population of pregnant women