1 / 17

Learning to Sense Sparse Signals: Simultaneous Sensing Matrix and Sparsifying Dictionary Optimization

Learning to Sense Sparse Signals: Simultaneous Sensing Matrix and Sparsifying Dictionary Optimization. Julio Martin Duarte-Carvajalino , and Guillermo Sapiro University of Minnesota IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 18, No. 7, July 2009. Presented by Haojun Chen. Outline.

peta
Télécharger la présentation

Learning to Sense Sparse Signals: Simultaneous Sensing Matrix and Sparsifying Dictionary Optimization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Learning to Sense Sparse Signals: Simultaneous Sensing Matrix and Sparsifying Dictionary Optimization Julio Martin Duarte-Carvajalino, and Guillermo Sapiro University of Minnesota IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 18, No. 7, July 2009 Presented by Haojun Chen

  2. Outline • Introduction • Sensing Matrix Learning • KSVD Algorithm • Coupled-KSVD • Experiment Results • Conclusion

  3. Introduction • Compressive Sensing(CS) • Two fundamental principles • Sparsity • Incoherent Sampling Gramm Matrix: is with all columns normalized Gramm matrix should be as close to the identity as possible = S non-zero N x N m x 1 m x N N x 1 Image source: www.usna.edu/Users/weapsys/avramov/Compressed%20sensing%20tutorial/cs1v4.ppt

  4. Sensing Matrix Learning • Assume the dictionary is known, the goal is to find the sensing matrix such that • Let be the eigen-decomposition of , then • Define • Objective is to compute to minimize • Let be the eigenvalues of , , , • Solution: ,

  5. Sensing Matrix Learning • Replacing back in terms of (rows of ) • Once we obtain , • Algorithm summary

  6. KSVD Algorithm • The objective of the KSVD algorithm is to solve, for a given sparsity level S, • Two stages in KSVD algorithm • Sparse Coding Stage: Using MP or BP • Dictionary Update Stage • Let and

  7. KSVD Algorithm • Define the group of examples that use the atom • Let , then • Let be the SVD of and define • Solution:

  8. KSVD Algorithm • KSVD algorithm consists of the following key steps: • Initialize • Repeat until convergence: • Sparse Coding Stage: For fixed, solve using OMP to obtain • Dictionary Update Stage: For j=1 to K • Define the group of examples that use this atom where P is the number of training square patches and • Let where • Obtain the largest singular value of and the corresponding singular vectors • Update using

  9. Coupled-KSVD • To simultaneously training a dictionary and the projection matrix , the following optimization problem is considered • Define , then the above equation can be rewritten as • Solution obtained from KSVD: where and

  10. Coupled-KSVD • Coupled-KSVD algorithm consists of the following key steps: • Initialize • Repeat until convergence: • For fixed, compute using the algorithm in sensing matrix learning • For fixed, solve using OMP to obtain • For j=1 to K • Define the group of examples that use this atom • where P is the number of training square patches and • Let • where • Obtain the largest singular value of and the corresponding singular vectors • Update using

  11. Experiment Strategies • Uncoupled random (UR) • Uncoupled learning (UL) • Coupled random (CR) • Coupled learning (CL)

  12. Experiment Results • Training data: 6600 8 x 8 patches extracted at random from 440 images • Testing data 120000 8 x 8 patches from 50 images Comparison of the average MSE of retrieval for the testing patches at different noise level and α K=64 Complete K=256 Overcomplete

  13. Experiment Results Comparison of the retrieval MSE ratio for CL/CR and CL/UL at different noise level and α K=64 Complete K=256 Overcomplete

  14. Experiment Results Best values of that produced the minimum retrieval MSE and at the same time the best CL/CR and CL/UL ratios, for a representative noise level of 5%.

  15. Experiment Results Testing image consisting of non-overlapping 8 × 8 patches reconstructed from their noisy projections (5% level of noise)

  16. Experiment Results Distribution of the off-diagonal elements of the Gramm matrix for each one of four strategies

  17. Conclusions • Framework for learning optimal sensing matrix for given sparsifying dictionary was introduced • Novel approach for simultaneously learning the sensing matrix and sparsifying dictionary was proposed

More Related