140 likes | 277 Vues
This guide provides an overview of plagiarism regulations within academic institutions, covering essential procedures pertaining to academic appeals, compulsory sessions before submissions, and penalties for plagiarism. It highlights the importance of student cooperation in cases of alleged misconduct, including the need for full investigations at the departmental level. The document addresses common pitfalls, the role of tools like Turnitin, and outlines factors influencing penalties. Understanding these aspects is crucial for maintaining academic integrity and navigating potential challenges.
E N D
Plagiarism Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation
Plagiarism • Health Check • Update publications • Compulsory session before any submissions • test? • plagiarism activities Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation
Plagiarism • Turnitin • Beating Turnitin • Arms Race • % of Work? • Plagiarism is an academic decision Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation
Plagiarism • Student Co-operation • must attend meeting • action if unavoidably absent • rights to advice and supporter • no representation • student must provide information immediately as required by department Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation
Plagiarism • Common Procedural mistakes • marking up (incomplete) • warning • “I know nothing” • entrapment • intention • all papers to the student including department’s reasoned conclusion (to the Office) Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation
Plagiarism • Elephant traps • group work • collusion • borrowed PCs • memory sticks • Full and complete investigation at Departmental level Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation
Plagiarism • Concurrent Offences • First Offences addressed in department • If one offence is aggravated both to the Committee • Aggravated Offences • Theft • Deception e.g. falsifying references • Malpractice Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation
Plagiarism • Mitigation • Principle: not comparable with mitigation for under-performance • Unlikely to affect guilt or innocence • Can affect penalty Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation
Plagiarism • Annex 3 of published procedures • full list of penalties • Departments can impose any penalty short of exclusion or delaying student’s progress • Cases before the Committee mean that the student’s place is in question Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation
Plagiarism • Rule of thumb • compare penalty with case of student who has failed honestly • if no difference, then penalty is too light • remember it is a penalty not action for a case of illness • Factors for consideration • scale of offence, relative to the piece of work • seniority of the student • source of material, e.g. essay mill, internet etc • attempt at concealment • mitigation and its relevance • Advice from Office Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation
Plagiarism • Consistency • record offences and penalties • keep penalties simple • bear in mind the student’s level of study • remember longer term consequences for the student but retain consistency • effect on Honours • displacement of work, workload issues Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation
Plagiarism • Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA) • identify cases at an early stage • consistent and comprehensive checking process • retrospective investigations permitted • procedural irregularities fatal • Change Procedures • August sits: Externals Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation
Plagiarism • Awards • University forbids any award where plagiarism has not been purged (PVC and Committee on Applications) • No knowingly plagiarised work can contribute to an award of the University • Degrees can be revoked Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation
Plagiarism • Have a nice day! Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation