1 / 29

Regression to the Mean

Regression to the Mean. The Simple Explanation. When you select a group from the extreme end of a distribution. The Simple Explanation. When you select a group from the extreme end of a distribution. Selected group’s mean. Overall mean. The Simple Explanation.

romeo
Télécharger la présentation

Regression to the Mean

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Regression to the Mean

  2. The Simple Explanation... When you select a group from the extreme end of a distribution...

  3. The Simple Explanation... When you select a group from the extreme end of a distribution... Selected group’s mean Overall mean

  4. The Simple Explanation... When you select a group from the extreme end of a distribution... Selected group’s mean Overall mean the group will do better on a subsequent measure.

  5. The Simple Explanation... When you select a group from the extreme end of a distribution... Selected group’s mean Overall mean the group will do better on a subsequent measure. Where it would have been with no regression

  6. The Simple Explanation... When you select a group from the extreme end of a distribution... Selected group’s mean Overall mean the group will do better on a subsequent measure Where its mean is

  7. The Simple Explanation... When you select a group from the extreme end of a distribution... Selected group’s mean Overall mean the group will do better on a subsequent measure. The group mean on the first measure appears to “regress toward the mean” of the second measure. Overall mean

  8. The Simple Explanation... When you select a group from the extreme end of a distribution... Selected group’s mean Overall mean the group will do better on a subsequent measure. The group mean on the first measure appears to “regress toward the mean” of the second measure. Overall mean Regression to the mean

  9. Example I: Pretest If the first measure is a pretest and you select the low scorers...

  10. Example I: Pretest If the first measure is a pretest and you select the low scorers... ...and the second measure is a posttest Posttest

  11. Example I: Pretest if the first measure is a pretest and you select the low scorers... ...and the second measure is a posttest, regression to the mean will make it appear as though the group gained from pre to post. Posttest Pseudo-effect

  12. Example II: Pretest If the first measure is a pretest and you select the high scorers...

  13. Example II: Pretest if the first measure is a pretest and you select the high scorers... ...and the second measure is a posttest, Posttest

  14. Example I: Pretest If the first measure is a pretest and you select the high scorers... ...and the second measure is a posttest, regression to the mean will make it appear as though the group lost from pre to post. Posttest Pseudo-effect

  15. Some Facts • This is purely a statistical phenomenon. • This is a group phenomenon. • Some individuals will move opposite to this group trend.

  16. Why Does It Happen? • For low scorers, you have taken the lowest x%. What are the chances they will be the lowest x% on the second measure? • For high scorers, you have taken the highest x%. What are the chances they will be the highest x% on the second measure?

  17. Why Does It Happen? • Regression artifacts occur whenever you sample asymmetrically from a distribution. • Regression artifacts occur with any two variables (not just pre and posttest) and even backwards in time!

  18. What Does It Depend On? The absolute amount of regression to the mean depends on two factors: • The degree of asymmetry (i.e., how far from the overall mean of the first measure the selected group's mean is) • The correlation between the two measures

  19. A Simple Formula The percent of regression to the mean is

  20. A Simple Formula The percent of regression to the mean is: Prm = 100(1 - r)

  21. A Simple Formula The percent of regression to the mean is Prm = 100(1 - r) Where r is the correlation between the two measures.

  22. A Simple Formula The percent of regression to the mean is: Prm = 100(1 - r) Where r is the correlation between the two measures. The formula tells the %, but the actual amount depends on how far the group mean is from the overall mean on the selection variable.

  23. For Example: Prm = 100(1 - r) • If r = 1, there is no (i.e., 0%) regression to the mean. • If r = 0, there is 100% regression to the mean. • If r = .2, there is 80% regression to the mean. • If r = .5, there is 50% regression to the mean.

  24. Example Assume a standardized test with a mean of 50. Pretest 50

  25. Example Assume a standardized test with a mean of 50 Pretest You give your program to the lowest scorers and their mean is 30. 30 50

  26. Example Assume a standardized test with a mean of 50. Pretest You give your program to the lowest scorers and their mean is 30. Assume that the correlation of pre-post is .5. 30 50 Posttest

  27. Example Assume a standardized test with a mean of 50. Pretest You give your program to the lowest scorers and their mean is 30. Assume that the correlation of pre-post is .5. 30 50 The formula is… Posttest

  28. Example Assume a standardized test with a mean of 50. Pretest You give your program to the lowest scorers and their mean is 30. Assume that the correlation of pre-post is .5. 30 50 The formula is Prm = 100(1 - r) = 100(1-.5) = 50% Posttest 50%

  29. Example Assume a standardized test with a mean of 50. Pretest You give your program to the lowest scorers and their mean is 30. Assume that the correlation of pre-post is .5. 30 50 The formula is Prm = 100(1 - r) = 100(1-.5) = 50% Therefore the mean will regress up 50% (from 30 to 50), leaving a final mean of 40 and a 10 point pseudo-gain. 40 Posttest Pseudo-effect

More Related