1 / 8

RMC Auditor Review Sub-Team Report - July 2011

The RMC Auditor Review Sub-Team, consisting of key members from leading aerospace companies, undertakes the critical role of reviewing and recognizing Accreditation and Certification Bodies within Aerospace Quality Management Standards. This report outlines the total auditors approved and rejected for various standards such as AS9100 and AS9110 from April 2008 to July 2011. It also highlights the reasons for auditor rejections and identifies concerns related to auditor work experience and training compliance, aiming to enhance the overall quality control within the aerospace industry.

tacita
Télécharger la présentation

RMC Auditor Review Sub-Team Report - July 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. RMC Auditor Review Sub-team ReportJuly 18, 2011Boston, MA

  2. Sub-Team Voting Members • Will Tate (TL), Triumph Aerostructures – Vought Aircraft Division • Susie Neal, Goodrich • Roger Pelletier, Bombardier Aerospace • Rick Downs, Cessna-Textron • Vince May, Honeywell • Robert Flaharty, Spirit Aerosystems • Steve LaScala, Northrop Grumman • Bryan Milne, Gulfstream • Jeffery Long, UTC (Pratt & Whitney) • Kristine Armstrong, Rockwell Collins • Eduardo Lorenzo Castro, Embraer • Mike Roberts, The Boeing Company • Mel Jeppson, ATK

  3. Sub-Team Charter This sub-team is responsible for: • Review and recognition of Accreditation Bodies (AB), Certification/Registration Bodies (CRB), auditors, trainers for Aerospace Quality Management Standards (AQMS), auditor competency training and auditor approvals for all of the Aerospace AQMS i.e. AS 9100, AS 9110, AS 9120.

  4. Total Auditors Approved /TotalRejected Apr – 08 Jul 2011 • AS 9100B • AEA/AIEA - 4/1 • AA - 3/0 • AS9100:2009 • AIEA/AEA – 6/1 • AA – 3/0 • AS 9110 • AEA/AIEA – 0/0 • AA – 3/0 • AS9110:2009 • AEA/AIEA – 2/1 • AA – 0/0

  5. Total Auditors Approved /TotalRejected YTD 2011 AS 9100B AEA/AIEA - 9/3 AA - 6/0 AS9100:2009 AIEA/AEA – 9/1 AA – 6/0 AS 9110 AEA/AIEA – 0/0 AA – 4/0 AS9110:2009 AEA/AIEA – 3/1 AA – 3/0

  6. Reason for Auditor Rejections:20102011Didn’t Meet Work Experience Reg.: 80% 90%Witness or Number Audits Wrong: 20 % 10% CBs & Training Courses Apr – 08 Jul 2011 • No Training Courses Have Been Reviewed or Approved • No Trainer/evaluators were approved • 1 CB Approved – Orion Registrars, Inc – AS9110

  7. Concerns • Auditor work experience issues • Definition in AS9104 not specific in definition of prime supplier • AS9104 does not address Defense related work experience • AS91XX:2004 auditor requests, late in 2nd Qtr • Delayed appeals by previously rejected applicants • More applicants with experience that does not clearly meet requirements defined in AS9104 • AEA/AIEA • Validation of experience when requested • Initial appearance that applicant has not met Lead auditor training requirements.

  8. AAQG - RMC

More Related