150 likes | 230 Vues
PSC Europe Forum first Assembly Meeting 21 st and 22 nd May 2007 in Chamber of Commerce in Luxemburg. 1 st day Welcome by EU Commissioner Viviane Reding Panel of Keynote Speakers from all Stakeholders Constitution of the PSC Europe Forum Introductions to PSC Europe
E N D
PSC Europe Forum first Assembly Meeting 21st and 22nd May 2007 in Chamber of Commerce in Luxemburg • 1st day • Welcome by EU Commissioner Viviane Reding • Panel of Keynote Speakers from all Stakeholders • Constitution of the PSC Europe • Forum • Introductions to PSC Europe • Workshops • Networking Reception • 2nd day • Keynote Speakers • Parallel Workshops on Key Public Safety Communication Issues • Workshops Conclusions • Closing and Next Event No 1 of 15 slides
Detailed Program 21st May 2007 No 2 of 15 slides
Detailed Program 22nd May 2007 No 3 of 15 slides
Workshop 1 on Operational Interoperability Challenges Chairman Walter Legrand, EADS Secure Networks • The following issues will be addressed: • How can the required consensus and strong political support be ensured? • How can Europe obtain an agreement on different TSO contents (such as event • dictionary, missions, codes, etc)? • Which organization can assist in building such agreement? • What other information do users want to define commonly in the different phases • of an emergency and disaster cycle? • What is missing? • How does it fit in a global European information model? • What are the gaps? • How can US work be introduced, adapted? • Do the selected scenarios allow validation in line with the work done by ETSI • EMTEL and MESA? No 4 of 15 slides
Workshop 2 on Broadband Challenges in Europe Chairman Vania Conan, Thales • The following issues will be addressed: • What are the key services users expect from Broadband? • Which scenarios (operational, functional, technology independent) would exemplify • these services best? • Can we define some common EU picture? • What are the process/options for influencing the standards/specification work: • Is it sufficient to use present technology? • Can we assemble it with existing IT/Com infrastructures? • Are there scenarios that would be satisfied, others not? • If new technology is required what should be the role of ETSI (MESA, EMTEL, new • tools? No 5 of 15 slides
Workshop 3 on Terminology Chairman Felipe Fernández, Universidad de Politécnica de Madrid • The following issues will be addressed: • Public safety terminology and acronym definitions are drawn from many sources. • These include communication technology, information technology, emergency • systems, safety systems and civil protection services. Its terminology has in many • cases developed in an unstructured manner with proliferation into multiple terms, • some with overlapping, alternative, or even ambiguous meanings. This situation • can be a source of confusion to both authors and readers of publications on PSC, • and a cause of difficulty in translation into other languages • Having gathered and considered all the relevant information, suggestions and • references on this subject, PSC Europe will propose a PSC Europe Terminology • Lexicon, which will be continuously displayed on PSC Europe web-site, and put • before the Forum for discussion and future endorsement No 6 of 15 slides
Workshop 4 on Public Safety Communication Policy Chairman Gordon Gow, University of Alberta • The following issues will be addressed: • An effective public policy framework is one that will ultimately save lives through • better public safety communications systems and practices. PSC Europe Forum is • an occasion for gathering data on user needs, for technology road mapping, and • for undertaking market study reports. Together, these activities can drive forward a • public safety communications policy agenda that can fulfil the promise of new • technology for the PSC community across Europe and around the world • The workshop will present a concept paper based on a preliminary review of • published documents by PSC organizations and related policy studies. The aim of • the workshop will be to discuss these findings, to place them in a European • context, and to further specify directions for follow-up research in a Discussion • Paper, possibly under a Policy Working Group. This Discussion Paper would then • provide the basis for subsequent meetings and research activities leading to the • creation of a Policy Roadmap No 7 of 15 slides
Workshop 5 on Satellite for Emergency Communications Chairman Matteo Berioli, German Aerospace Center • The following issues will be addressed: • The use of rapidly-deployable broadband and portable satellite system (to replace • existing narrowband solutions in the first hours after a disaster) • The transition of the satellite solutions from the very first hours and days after an • emergency up to the re-establishment of a permanent wireless telecommunication • infrastructure • Identify the need and developing of telecommunication standards to support this • (e.g. coordination with ETSI SES/SatEC working group) • Allocation of satellite capacity to be made available to national governments in • case of disaster events, and potentially dedicated European satellite capacity for • this purpose (coordination with ESA is foreseen) • Support Tampere Convention, assure that satellite activities are in line with the • Convention • Regulatory and licensing recommendations on the use of satellite and terrestrial • frequencies in case of emergency No 8 of 15 slides
Workshop 6 on Emergency Telecommunications for Citizens Chairman Olivier Paul Morandini, EENA • The following issues will be addressed: • Standards concerning the geographical coverage of emergency telecommunication service within the EU (i.e. • no black non-covered spots because of network unavailability) as well as the coverage by all citizens including • disabled users. Users should be aware of the possibility or not to call the emergency number from an area not • covered by a network, before entering this area • Multiple emergency numbers should progressively be abolished and replaced by the single European • emergency call number, like 112. Experience in many EU countries and the US has shown that «one number is • better than many» • Emergency call centres should be able to reply to calls within a minimal time, to be established as a standard at • EU level. They should be able to handle calls in several EU languages and to transfer calls to the appropriate • (emergency or non emergency) services without interrupting the communication with the caller • Operators of emergency call centres should reply and handle calls on the basis of commonly established • standardised protocols ensuring the efficient and prompt identification of the emergency and the timely • expedition of help • Enforcing of caller localisation should be implemented in a transparent way and without violation of citizen’s • privacy, according to EU legislation in force • Commonly agreed standards at EU level should be established for the maximum arrival time on the spot of the • emergency in urban and rural areas as well as for the quality of help offered by emergency services to the • callers • Establishment of common indicators for the evaluation of the implementation of the quality standards • established. Periodic evaluations of the emergency call service chain should also be provided for (knowledge, • availability, quality of answering and handling calls, total intervention time, quality of services offered) at • national and EU level by independent organisations. No 9 of 15 slides
Workshop 7 on Harmonized Multi Distribution of Warning Messages Chairman Mark Wood, CEASA • The following issues will be addressed: • If we want to reach citizens with an important warning message or advisory, we • need to use a method that will be intrusive and all pervasive • Cell Broadcasting is a very powerful tool for the initial warning, it is pervasive • throughout society and the fact that it rings the phones bell means that it is • intrusive. This is an excellent attention getter • Accordingly we need to have technical middleware which can distribute authorized • messages over several different systems technologies. However this technology • will need to be programmed with rules so that abuses by unauthorized sources • cannot hijack the system for spamming or cyber terrorism. Accordingly there needs • to be a rigorous regime of ‘Trust Protocol Boards’, stakeholders including • government and network operators, deciding who can say what and where • The proposed workshop will launch the idea to set up of national ‘Trust Protocol • Boards’, and a network of ‘Message service Brokers’ to administer the agreements • of the boards No 10 of 15 slides
Workshop 8 on Operational Scenarios in Public Safety Communication Chairman Milt Statheropoulos, NTUA • The following issues will be addressed: • Operational scenarios, in order to have functionality and effectiveness, need to be • relevant to today’s world situation and have to be real tools for those that they • need them most - the end users. They must have technological substance and • strong impacts in improving existing methodologies • The aims of the workshop will be: to discuss and prepare guidelines for collection • and development of operational scenarios with emphasis on communication • issues, to standardise in a simple, functional and well understood way their • development so as to prepare a library of scenarios with the capability of updating • The format of the collection and development will be open to discussion. Scenarios • may include events described with strong scientific background, definitions of • participants and their roles, identification of functional requirements and existing • network technologies and solutions in interoperability issues. Running these • scenarios is expected to result in proposals for potential enhancements • The forum will also serve as a platform for discussion in regard to the • harmonization of different legal systems relevant to disasters No 11 of 15 slides
Workshop 9 on Security and Access Rights Chairman Kevin Robson, BAPCO • The following issues will be addressed: • Terminology and trust are key disablers to information sharing. But what are the • other obstacles to information access that still exist, and how might they be • overcome? • Why are security levels non-standard and should they be defined by role or by the • possible impact of an information sharing transaction? • Who decides? • Is data ownership still a significant issue, and who is legally responsible for • subsequent action once disparate sources of information are collated, analysed • and new conclusions drawn? • These questions are not meant to be all encompassing; they merely reflect a small • number of the issues associated with authorisation, authentication, security and • access, which for the most part are being dealt with on an ad-hoc basis by • individual projects rather than through the adoption of cohesive or standard • approaches. To make progress we must identify and own the problem, and • together identify pragmatic solutions No 12 of 15 slides
Workshop 10 on Public safety Communication Research Chairman Adrian Boukalov, University of Luxembourg • The following issues will be addressed: • Vision of Future Public Safety Communications (PSC) Technology. Industrial, • user, regulator and market perspective • The key elements of PSC Technology Development Road Map • What are the most important research issues to be addressed by future • research programs ? • Integration of Research efforts at European and International levels • Cooperation between IST projects in the area of PSC • Do we need a European Technology Platform for public safety • communications ? • Establishing of Safety Research Initiative (SRI) Work Group and Steering • Committee No 13 of 15 slides
Workshop 11 on Spectrum Harmonization Chairman Jeppe Jepsen, Motorola • The following issues will be addressed: • Public Safety organisations have limited spectrum set aside for their • mission critical voice and data needs in 380-400 MHz band. National • networks across Europe are either operational or in the process of being • established • Organisations are now requiring higher data capabilities and access to more spectrum is a requirement • Work in CEPT have identified opportunities for wide band spectrum around • 380-450 MHz, but is availability realistic? • Work in CEPT have identified requirements for local area adhoc networks • for Disaster Relief efforts in 4,9 – 5,9 GHz. Is Disaster Relief too limited • an application? • Public Safety organisations have an opportunity with the digital dividend – can we • agree a way forward? No 14 of 15 slides
Workshop 12 on IP Based Public Safety Communication Chairman Jim Bound, IPv6 Task Force • The following issues will be addressed: • The IP-based Safety Initiative (ISI) seeks to define the roadmap for the • deployment of advanced broadband applications, related radio technologies and • modern IP-based system architecture. The benefits of IP-based services (and • specifically IPv6-based) are numerous: • Cost savings in deployment of public safety networks • Proliferation of innovative safety products (networked RFID, Sensors) • Interoperable IP capable networks nation-wide and worldwide • Enablement of Trusted End-to-End IP based Network Security • Enablement of IP based Network Management • Enablement of IP based Seamless Network and Node Mobility • Enablement of Next Generation Network Application Services to Users • Common open standards communication protocol to support multiple wireless networks configuration and integration (e.g. Sensor, Link, Internet) No 15 of 15 slides