1 / 60

Under Armour: PEST and Industry Analysis

Under Armour: PEST and Industry Analysis. Brian Teufel MGT 490-004 Assignment #2 Professor McDermott March 17, 2011. Under Armour Snapshot. Kevin Plank, the CEO of Under Armour developed a blue ocean strategy

viveca
Télécharger la présentation

Under Armour: PEST and Industry Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Under Armour:PEST and Industry Analysis Brian Teufel MGT 490-004 Assignment #2 Professor McDermott March 17, 2011

  2. Under Armour Snapshot • Kevin Plank, the CEO of Under Armour developed a blue ocean strategy • Created Performance Apparel market – enhances consumers performance while offering greater comfort • Total sales over $1.0 billion in 2010 • First-mover advantage has allowed UA to gain 70% of the U.S. market and about 15% of the global market • Performance Apparel has evolved from niche to mainstream in terms of target market and competition (Nike and Adidas)

  3. Under Armour Snapshot (cont.) • Under Armour owns branded retail stores in 28 U.S. states (30+ stores) and 23 other countries (25+ stores). - First UA branded retail store opened on November 1, 2007.

  4. • Opportunities and Threats are ranked in terms of importance separately; top five of each are ranked accordingly. (1 = extremely important, 5 = Not very important. Pest Analysis

  5. Political Factor Economic Factors • FDI Policies- Some foreign countries have policies in place that prohibit 100% ownership of retail stores which poses threat to internationalization • Chinese Labor Costs Increasing • Costs of international labor is on the rise. • Hourly compensation costs of manufacturing employees in China from 2002-2008 is shown below.

  6. Economic Factors (cont.) •The growth of the performance apparel industry is the greatest opportunity. •More Consumers = More Revenues

  7. Social Factors • Obesity rates in U.S. show people not physically active • Consumers focus on quality more than price • Increase in physically active women • Increase in health conscious consumers = more exercise/physical activity • Sport participation is a key aspect of U.S. culture • Aging population and increase in physically active seniors • Increase in sports participation in emerging markets

  8. Technological Factors • Increase in e-commerce • Increase in m-commerce (trend is to always have digital connection)

  9. PEST Summary

  10. PEST Summary

  11. Industry Analysis Overview • Under Armour is in the extremely competitive performance apparel industry which is defined as anything that is worn which enhances the performance of the user. • Performance apparel global sales = $6.4 billion in 2010 and is expected to grow to $7.6 billion by 2014. • In 4 years, the industry is expected to grow by 15%.

  12. Porter’s 5 Forces

  13. Threat of New Entrants - High • With the expected growth of the performance apparel industry, there will be new entrants in the industry from all over the world. • Most companies who enter the performance apparel industry are unable to compete due to existing brand loyalty and the high barriers to entry. • Examples include New Balance, Velocity, and Sugoi

  14. Threat of Substitutes – Moderate to High • Substitutes are limited to conventional apparel or no apparel at all. • Core athletes have a large number of substitute options to choose from.

  15. Bargaining Power of Buyers – Moderate to High • The bargaining power of buyers depends on the consumer’s skill level and the level of the team.

  16. Bargaining Power of Suppliers - Moderate • The use of third party suppliers allows performance apparel companies to chose their suppliers based on highest quality and lowest production cost. • Third party suppliers have high bargaining power by being able to choose the companies that they want to supply for. • The best third party suppliers can select the company orcompanies that treat them the best and provide the best compensation. • There are thousands of third party suppliers all over the world.

  17. Rivalry Intensity - High • Currently, the performance apparel industry is growing rapidly at 15%; this allows rivalry to grow rapidly as well. • There is a high # of competitors but UA, Nike, and Adidas make up the majority of the industry due to a quality advantage over other competitors.

  18. Blue Ocean Strategy Innovation Differentiation Niche R&D Enhance Performance

  19. Conclusions • The opportunities for the performance apparel industry outweigh the threats. • Labor and gas costs are increasing but opportunities such as the global growth of the PA industry, global increase in sport participation, and increase in both e-commerce and m-commerce outweigh the threats. • Rivalry is extremely high in the performance apparel industry. • The competition between Nike, Adidas, and Under Armour is fierce and it continues to heat up. • Participants in the performance apparel industry must always be aware of new entrants because the industry is on the rise. • Create high barriers to entry. • Blue Ocean Strategy was the basis for Under Armour and it allowed them to achieve success in the PA industry. • Innovation, Differentiation, R&D, Creating Niche of performance apparel that enhances performance while allowing comfort.

  20. Under Armour:Competitor and Market Analysis Brian Teufel MGT 490-004 Assignment #2 Professor McDermott March 17, 2011

  21. Key Competitors

  22. Other Competitors

  23. Performance Apparel Industry

  24. Competitive Advantage Generic Strategy Low Cost Differentiation Broad Target Competitive Scope Narrow Target

  25. Price Price/QualityComparison Low High •New Balance Low •Champion •PUMA Quality •Columbia Sportswear Company •Quiksilver •The North Face High •Adidas •Nike •Under Armour

  26. Performance Apparel Industry Geographic Breakdown 2% 20%

  27. Performance Apparel Geographic Growth Rates by Company • -UA = 4% • -Nike = (-6%) • Adidas = 7% • Col. Sportswear = 13% • Quiksilver = (-8%) • PUMA = (-3%) • -UA =5% • -Nike = 0% • Adidas = 2% • Col. Sportswear = 30% • Quiksilver = 4% • PUMA = (-2&) • -UA = 23.5% • -Nike = 8% • Adidas = 7% • Col. Sportswear = 22% • Quiksilver = (-9%) • PUMA = 22% • -UA = 0% • -Nike = 20% • Adidas = 16% • Col. Sportswear = 13% • Quiksilver = N/A • PUMA = -3% • -UA = 0% • -Nike = 20% • Adidas = 14% • Col. Sportswear = 10% • Quiksilver = (-9%) • PUMA = 22%

  28. Performance Apparel Industry Defined • Performance Apparel is defined as anything that is worn which enhances the performance of the user. • New and existing companies are attempting to break into the PA industry every day due to the rapid growth. • The top three companies in the global PA industry include Nike, Adidas, and Under Armour • Gross sales come from company owned stores and third party retailers. • Sell products of quality which enhance performance while providing comfort to the user.

  29. Market Analysis 52% Inc. 15% Inc. • The Performance Apparel industry has grown rapidly in the past four years and it is expected to continue to grow rapidly the next four years.

  30. Performance Apparel Growth Rates 9% 22% 15% 2% 4% 7%

  31. Key Trends in PA

  32. Strategic Layout of Competition

  33. Strategic Layout of Competition

  34. Strategic Layout of Competition

  35. Social Media Importance • Social media has impacted the PA industry positively, increase in sales due to easier communication between consumers. • Consumers can give feedback (+ and -) in a relaxed environment. • Consumers can also socialize with other consumers to discuss PA products. • Marketing has been most effected by social media with sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Foursquare, and LinkedIn. • PA companies can market to larger groups of consumers at a much cheaper cost.

  36. Conclusions • Nike and Adidas are Under Armour’s primary competition in the performance apparel industry. • Nike and Adidas have jumped UA in total PA sales even though PA accounts for only 7% of Nike’s and 9% of Adidas’s total turnover. • Under Armour would be the global leader in performance apparel sales if they were as successful internationally as they currently are in the U.S. • Asia and North America are fueling growth in the performance apparel industry with Europe also growing. • The performance apparel market is growing at a rate of higher than 15% and it is expected to continue to increase for the for seeable future.

  37. Under Armour:Internal Analysis, SWOT Analysis, Competitive Position, and Conclusions/Recommendations Brian Teufel MGT 490-004 Assignment #3 Professor McDermott March 17, 2011

  38. Under Armour’s Performance • Under Armour’s PA sales and net income have increased every year since 2006.

  39. Under Armour’s Performance • On average, around 80% of Under Armour’s net income comes from PA.

  40. Change in Sales by Product • All $ amounts are in millions • Footwear sales increased every year from 2006-2009 but decreased by 7% in 2010. • PA and accessories sales have increased every year; PA had a huge increase of 24% from 2009 to 2010.

  41. Change in Distribution of Sales by Region • International sales have increased every year since 2008 but UA is still heavily reliable on North America for about 90% of their total sales.

  42. Under Armour’s Assets

  43. Employee Distribution # of Employees, % of Total Employees • Under Armour has a total of 3,900 employees. • Factory House and Specialty Stores employees are increasing rapidly because UA is opening more branded stores. • Almost ¼ of UA’s employees are devoted to research and development.

  44. SWOT Analysis – Strengths and Weaknesses

  45. SWOT Analysis – Opportunities and Threats

  46. SWOT Analysis - Summary

More Related