1 / 6

LBA-ECO Data Breakout Group

LBA-ECO Data Breakout Group. How to assure that metadata for important data sets continue to be registered. How to encourage linking publications to registered data sets. Achieve agreement on data documentation standards for LBA-ECO vis-a-vis ORNL DAAC requirements.

yosef
Télécharger la présentation

LBA-ECO Data Breakout Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LBA-ECO Data Breakout Group How to assure that metadata for important data sets continue to be registered. How to encourage linking publications to registered data sets. Achieve agreement on data documentation standards for LBA-ECO vis-a-vis ORNL DAAC requirements. Identify data-related issues associated with the end of LBA-ECO field work (Dec 04/ June 05).

  2. Data Archive and Documentation • Some data sets should be available and usable for the next 20 years – these data should meet “long term data archive requirements” • Completing only mandatory fields in Beija-flor may not provide enough metadata/documentation and does not ensure full quality assessment of the actual data • Limited resources dictate that it will not be possible to bring all data in B-f to long-term archival status • Need to select B-f records that should go to long-term archive (there are some good example of data sets that are very close, if not there already) • Some data not currently in B-f will need to be tracked

  3. Which data sets should be archived?Criteria to consider • All data related to pubs in open literature should be archived • Consider number of ftp-pulls for B-f entries (but PI to PI sharing is not covered in this metric) • Consider the long-term scientific merit of the data • Seek input from science team • Focus on Phase 1 data and prioritize teams not funded for Phase 2 • Will data be lost if not archived by LBA-ECO?

  4. Suggestions from Group • Create a “LBA-DIS science archive subgroup” with telecons every 6-8 weeks, open to any interested party • Distinguish an LBA-DIS liaison for each team • Questions need to be asked when data are fresh and synthesis science will find gaps in data, so synthesis science should be done as soon as possible.

  5. Suggestions from Group • Documenting/archiving models and software (not just model output) • Different metadata requirements • Timing issues • Included a “user-feedback” automatically when users follows “data access” link in B-f • Reduce the long-term “documentation tool” burden so that extra effort is similar to effort required enter the data in B-f

  6. Getting more data registered • Require relevant Beija-flor entry/entries for each abstract submitted to July 2004 all-LBA science meeting • Request any LBA-related “special issue” guest editors require relevant metadata (including long-term archive requirements) - subject to metadata peer review • Suggest to investigators that data will be part of long term archive and that long-term archive information is needed for papers anyway

More Related