1 / 20

2004 ITRS Public Conference PIDS ITWG Emerging Research Devices San Francisco, CA July 14, 2004

2004 ITRS Public Conference PIDS ITWG Emerging Research Devices San Francisco, CA July 14, 2004. Jim Hutchby - SRC. ITRS PIDS Emerging Research Devices Working Group. George Bourianoff Intel/SRC Joe Brewer U. Florida Toshiro Hiramoto Tokyo U. Jim Hutchby SRC

yoshi-fuller
Télécharger la présentation

2004 ITRS Public Conference PIDS ITWG Emerging Research Devices San Francisco, CA July 14, 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2004 ITRS Public Conference PIDS ITWG Emerging Research Devices San Francisco, CA July 14, 2004 Jim Hutchby - SRC

  2. ITRS PIDSEmerging Research Devices Working Group • George Bourianoff Intel/SRC • Joe Brewer U. Florida • Toshiro Hiramoto Tokyo U. • Jim Hutchby SRC • Mike Forshaw UC London • Tsu-Jae King UC Berkeley • Rainer Waser RWTH A • In Yoo Samsung • John Carruthers OGI • Lothar Risch Infineon • Ming-Jinn Tsai ERSO/ITRI • Wei-Tsun Shiau UMC • Peter Zeitzoff ISMT • Makoto Yoshimi SOITEC • Kristin De Meyer IMEC • Tak Ning IBM • Philip Wong IBM • Luan Tran Micron • Victor Zhirnov SRC/NCSU • Simon Deleonibus LETI • Thomas Skotnicki ST Me • Yuegang Zhang Intel • Kentaro Shibahara Hiroshima U. • Byong Gook Park Seoul N. U. • Fred Boeuf ST Me • Dan Hammerstrom OGI

  3. ITRS PIDSEmerging Research Materials Working Group • Jim Hutchby SRC • Lalita Manchanda SRC/Agere • Rafael Reif MIT • Sadasivan Shankar Intel • Shinichi Takagi U. Tokyo • Eric Vogle NIST • Kang Wang UCLA • Rainer Waser Aachen U. • In Yoo Samsung • Victor Zhirnov SRC/NCSU • Charles Black IBM • John Carruthers OGI • Alex Demkov Freescale • Mike Forshaw UCL • Gerhard Klimeck Purdue • Mike Garner Intel • Bruno Ghysiene SOITEC • Jeff Grossman LLNL • David Muller Cornell • Dan Herr SRC • Susan Holl Intel

  4. ITRS PIDSEmerging Research Architectures Working Group • Victor Zhirnov SRC/NCSU • Dan Hammerstrom OGI • Vwani Roychowdery UCLA • Mike Forshaw UCL • John Carruthers OGI • George Bourianoff Intel/SRC • Tobias Noll Aachen U.

  5. Emerging Research DevicesIntroduction and Scope Cast a broad net to introduce readers to new material, device and architecture concepts for information processing --- Concept -- not hardened solutions Identify -- not endorse -- and quantify Include Stimulate -- and assess/critique Prioritize -- and define research needs (new)

  6. Fundamental Requirements Energy restorative functional process (e.g. gain) Compatible with CMOS At or above room temperature operation Compelling Motivations Functionally scaleable > 100x beyond CMOS limit High information processing rate and throughput Minimum energy per functional operation Minimum, scaleable cost per function Requirements & Motivations for Information Processing Beyond CMOS

  7. Emerging Research DevicesIntroduction and Scope 2004/2005 Broadened Scope Compared to 2003 Chapter --- New quantitative performance metrics --- potential versus to-date performance In-depth critical assessment --- key application driven questions/issues Knowledge requirements roadmap --- requirements-driven research needs (new)

  8. Transfer to PIDS/FEP in 2005 Emerging Research DevicesOrganization & Component Tasks (2003) Emerging Research Devices Non-classical CMOS Research Logic and Memory Devices Functional Organization (Architectures)

  9. New Memory and Logic Technologies New Architecture Technologies Nanotubes Molecular devices Quantum cellular automata Emerging Information Processing Concepts Scope of Emerging Research Devices2003 Bulk CMOS Double-Gate CMOS

  10. Single Gate Non-classical CMOS Transfer to PIDS/FEP in 2005

  11. Multiple Gate Non-classical CMOS Transfer to PIDS/FEP in 2005

  12. Emerging Research Memory Devices

  13. Technology Performance and Risk Evaluation Emerging Research Memory Devices

  14. Emerging Research Memory Devices Move to PIDS/FEP in 2005

  15. Emerging Research Logic Devices

  16. Observations Transistor critical dimension limited to ~ 1 nm (In the 2003 ITRS physical gate length = 7 nm for 2018) Power density, not critical dimension, limits gate density to ~ 1 x 109 gates/cm2 For the ITRS density and switching time, CMOS is approaching the maximum power efficiency Scaling Limit of Charge Based SwitchAn Example of Critical Assessment

  17. Technology Performance and Risk Evaluation Emerging Research Logic Devices

  18. Emerging Materials Add to ERD in 2004 Emerging Research DevicesOrganization & Component Tasks (2004/2005) Emerging Research Devices Emerging Logic and Memory Devices Emerging Architectures

  19. New Materials Model Knowledge New Memory and Logic Technologies New Architecture Technologies Nanotubes Molecular devices Quantum cellular automata Emerging Information Processing Concepts Scope of Emerging Research Devices2005

  20. ERD transferring new potential solutions to PIDS/FEP Non-Classical CMOS Phase Change and Floating Body DRAM Creating a new section on Emerging Research Materials Enhancing technology evaluation and guiding activities Quantitative critique of emerging technologies New roadmap of scientific and technology information required to advance emerging information processing technologies Emerging Research DevicesSummary

More Related