Global Climate Change. James Hansen 1 February 2010 University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC. What Must We Do Now? *. * Statements relating to policy are personal opinion. Global Warming Status 1. Knowledge Gap Between - What is Understood (scientists) - What is Known (public)
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation
Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement.Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien.Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.
F I N
Plus de contenu associé
Transcription de la présentation
Global Climate Change James Hansen 1 February 2010 University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC What Must We Do Now?* *Statements relating to policy are personal opinion
Global Warming Status 1. Knowledge Gap Between - What is Understood (scientists) - What is Known (public) 2. Planetary Emergency - Climate Inertia Warming in Pipeline - Tipping Points Could Lose Control 3. Bad News & Good News - Safe Level of CO2 < 350 ppm - Multiple Benefits of Solution
Climate Tipping Points 1. Ice Sheet Disintegration - Ocean Warming Ice Shelves Melt Ice Streams Surge Disintegration 2. Species Extermination - Shifting Climate Zones, Multiple Stresses, Species Interdependencies 3. Methane Hydrate ‘frozen methane’ - In Tundra & On Continental Shelves - Depends On Ocean & Ice Sheets
60-month (5-year) and 132-month (11-year) mean temperature anomaly relative to 1951-1980 mean. Input data extend through December 2009. Source: Hansen et al., GISS analysis of surface temperature change. J. Geophys. Res.104, 30997-31022, 1999.
Surface Melt on Greenland Melt descending into a moulin, a vertical shaft carrying water to ice sheet base. Source: Roger Braithwaite, University of Manchester (UK)
Jakobshavn Ice Stream in Greenland Discharge from major Greenland ice streams is accelerating markedly. Source: Prof. Konrad Steffen, Univ. of Colorado
Assessment of Target CO2 PhenomenonTarget CO2 (ppm) 1. Arctic Sea Ice 300-350 2. Ice Sheets/Sea Level 300-350 3. Shifting Climatic Zones 300-350 4. Alpine Water Supplies 300-350 5. Avoid Ocean Acidification 300-350 Initial Target CO2 = 350* ppm *assumes CH4, O3, Black Soot decrease
Target CO2: < 350 ppm To preserve creation, the planet on which civilization developed
Scenarios assume no “Other” = Tar Sands, Oil Shale, Methane Hydrates Coal phase-out by 2030 peak CO2 ~400-425 ppm, depending on oil/gas. Faster return below 350 ppm requires additional actions Source: Hansen et al., Target atmospheric CO2: where should humanity aim? Open Atmos. Sci. J., 2, 217-231, 2008.
Initial Target CO2: 350 ppm Technically Feasible Quick Coal Phase-Out Necessary No new coal w/o CO2 capture All coal phased out within 20 years No Unconventional Fossil Fuels Tar Sands, Oil Shale, Methane Hydrates
What’s Really Happening (USA) 1. Tar Sands agreement with Canada Pipeline planned to transport oil 2. Oil Shale under development Twice CO2/energy of conventional oil 3. New Coal-fired power plants Rationalized by ‘Clean Coal’ mirage 4. Mountaintop removal proceeds Destroys wind potential of mountains
Global Action Status • Huge Gap: Rhetoric & Reality - Rhetoric: Planet in Peril - Reality: Small Perturbations to BAU 2.Greenwash/Disinformation Winning - Appeasement of Fossil Interests - Still Waiting for a Winston Churchill 3.Kyoto & Copenhagen Fiascos - Kyoto accelerating emissions - Copenhagen same “indulgences”
Problem & Solution • Fossil Fuels are Cheapest Energy - Subsidized & Do Not Pay Costs - Solution: Rising Price on Carbon 2.Regulations also Required - Efficiency of Vehicles, Buildings,e.g. - Carbon Price Provides Enforcement 3.Technology Development Needed - Driven by Certainty of Carbon Price - Government Role Limited
Fee & Dividend 1. Fee Applied at First Sale/Port of Entry Covers all Oil, Gas, Coal No Leakage 2. Fee Specified: No Speculation, No Volatility No Wall Street Millionaires at Public Expense 3. Fee & Dividend (vs. Cap-and-Trade) Not One Dime to Goldman-Sachs et al. Can be Implemented in Months Market Chooses Technology Winners British Columbia Example: Public Likes It
Carbon Fee & 100% Dividend (consider: $115/ton CO2 = $1/gal. gas) 1. Yield ~ $670B (U.S. example) 2. Dividend (bank acct or debit card) Adult Legal Resident ($250/month = $3000/year) Family with 2 Children ($750/month = $9000/year)
Fee & Dividend Addresses 1. Economy: Stimulates It Puts Money in Public’s Hands– A Lot! 2. Energy: Fossil Fuel Addiction Fastest Route to Clean Energy Future 3. Climate Only Internationally Viable Approach - - Zero Chance of China/India Accepting a Cap Would Result in Most Coal & Unconventional Fossil Fuels, some Oil left in the Ground
Universality, Fairness 1. Fees almost Universally Beneficial No Country Covets Fossil Fuel Addiction 2. Duties on Products from no-fee Areas Use for Mitigation/Adaptation Aid 3. Fairness: Reward Best Practices Use Duties preferentially for Countries that address Population (e.g., women’s education)
So What’s the Problem Today? 1. Fossil Fuels Still Priced Lowest Fossil Fuels Subsidized No Charge for Damages (Health, etc.) 2. Governments Under Fossil Thumbs Greenwash Instead of Leadership 3. Revolving Door in Washington Hatch Schemes for Business-as-Usual Favoring Big Banks, Fossil Fuel Industry
Cap-and-Trade-and-Offsets 1. Cap Approach Can’t Go Global China & India will never accept caps 2. Cap Dishonest: Pretends at Low Cost Actually expensive (very inefficient) 3. Cap Comes with Offsets Actual GHG reductions small 4. Cap causes Volatile Carbon Price Discourage business/consumer investing
Cap-and-Trade: Why??? 1. C&T Designed for Big Banks Top Two: JP MorganChase, Goldman Sachs 2. C&T Designed for Special Interests 2000-Page Bills Written by Special Interests Why??? Revolving Door Between Wall St. & Washington Revolving Door Between Lobbyists & Congress That’s the way the system seems to work now.
Intergenerational Justice Jefferson to Madison: …self-evident that “the Earth belongs in usufruct to the living”* Native Americans: obligation to 7th generation Larry King: “nobody cares about 50 years from now” Governments (with fossil interests): we can set emissions at whatever level we choose Public: when will it become involved? *Legal right to use something belonging to another
Connexion au compte
Connectez-vous pour publier votre contenu sur SlideServe.