1 / 12

CLOSING ARGUMENT

CLOSING ARGUMENT. LSU LAW TRIAL ADVOCACY BOARD 2010 WORKSHOP Jason St. Julien Slides Primarily Composed by Bridget Hillebrand. What is a closing argument?. Explanation of the case Be argumentative! Connects the evidence and testimony to the theory of the case Reiterates the theme

avery
Télécharger la présentation

CLOSING ARGUMENT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CLOSING ARGUMENT LSU LAW TRIAL ADVOCACY BOARD 2010 WORKSHOP Jason St. Julien Slides Primarily Composed by Bridget Hillebrand

  2. What is a closing argument? • Explanation of the case • Be argumentative! • Connects the evidence and testimony to the theory of the case • Reiterates the theme • Dismisses opponents arguments • Addresses the applicable burden of proof • Final plea to the fact finder

  3. LETS TALK reality • Primacy & Recency Effect • What is the jury thinking at this point? • Give the jury one and only one choice. • Be authentic. Be real.

  4. PERSUASIVE CONVERSATION • EMPOWER THE JURY • Permit them to argue for your point • Make them strong enough to judge or punish • Focus your argument on what YOU have shown • Making them believe that your point is their idea

  5. Fail-proof structure for any argument • TELL THEM WHAT YOU’RE GOING TO TELL THEM • TELL THEM • TELL THEM WHAT YOU TOLD THEM

  6. Movement & style • Speak in a powerful and confident manner • Escape from the podium • Chose language carefully • Make eye contact • Be sincere

  7. THE DESIGNSTEP 1: an Interesting introduction • Start Strong • Reemphasize YOUR story • What idea is at the core of your case? • What is your theme? • Tell them what you are going to tell them.

  8. STEP 2:WHAT HAPPENED AND WHY • STATE WHAT THE LAW IS! • Establish that your theme is grounded in the evidence, law, justice, and ethics • Testimony • Emphasize significant testimony • Exhibits • Clear up data and the meaning of the admitted exhibits • Fragment the Other Side • Question the other side’s use of facts • Show that their side is inconsistent, incoherent, impossible, or improbably • Characterize the other side’s case as unlikely, unjust, or not right with the law

  9. STEP 3: Discussion of law and burden of proof • Jury Instructions • Burden of Proof • Damages

  10. Step 4: An Appropriate Conclusion • Talk at the level of the jurors, handle their sympathy and empathy • Request relief • Leave them with ONE and only ONE choice • Leave them with something…

  11. IMPROPER CLOSING ARGUMENTS • Mentioning unadmitted evidence • Improperly commenting on missing evidence • Misstating or mischaracterizing evidence • Stating personal opinions • Appealing to sympathy or prejudice • Improperly arguing the law or damages • Improperly arguing on rebuttal (can only respond to arguments made by the defense) • Violating the “Golden Rule”

  12. DEMONSTRATION LSU LAW TRIAL ADVOCACY BOARD 2010 WORKSHOP Jason St. Julien

More Related