1 / 12

Conventional Facilities Schedule

Conventional Facilities Schedule. Steve Sawch Asst. Director, Construction Management CF Advisory Committee Review of the NSLS-II Project May 8, 2008. CF Schedule Outline. Schedule Parameters Schedule Risk Reduction Summary Schedule Schedule Durations Intermediate Milestone Challenge

carolynnt
Télécharger la présentation

Conventional Facilities Schedule

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Conventional Facilities Schedule Steve Sawch Asst. Director, Construction Management CF Advisory Committee Review of the NSLS-II Project May 8, 2008

  2. CF Schedule Outline • Schedule Parameters • Schedule Risk Reduction • Summary Schedule • Schedule Durations • Intermediate Milestone Challenge • Verification with Independent CPM Schedule • Schedule Analysis • WBS Update • Schedule Summary

  3. Schedule Parameters • Schedule for conventional facilities developed at detailed level • Needed to meet critical milestones • Needed to meet project funding • Needed to develop confidence in schedule phasing and sequencing • Needed to identify key interface points with accelerator & beamline installation • Needed to develop baseline schedule • Prepared based on input and discussions with: • LIRO/Gilbane CM scheduling group • Large local contractors • Consensus that logic, sequencing, phasing and durations are reasonable

  4. Schedule Risk Reduction • Early procurement • Site-prep reduces schedule and cost risk and overall duration • Takes risky earthwork (unforeseen existing conditions) off the critical path • Delays due to “getting out of the ground” are frequent source of claims • Perform environmental testing and remediation (if required) • Decommission/relocate existing utilities • Early procurement of chilled water equipment • Chillers • Cooling Towers • Early procurement of electrical equipment • Main substation • Switchgear

  5. Summary Schedule

  6. Schedule - Durations • Construction Activities • Site preparation contract duration – 4 months • Main bldg contract bid & award – 5 months • Ring bldg contract duration – 36 months (excluding LOBs) • Entire bldg contract duration - 48 months • Chilled Water Plant Expansion – 28 months • Electrical Utilities – 18 months • Mechanical Utilities – 22 months • LN2 system – 9 months

  7. Critical Intermediate Milestones • Key schedule objective – Enable start of accelerator installation March 2011 • CF is on or near critical path until the main bldg spaces are turned over for accelerator installation • Schedule was interfaced with Accelerator and EXP. Facilities groups to identify necessary and workable dependencies • Key dependencies: • 1st pentant ready for accelerator installation • BO of Ring Bldg for beamline installation

  8. Pentant 1 Detailed Schedule

  9. Verification with Independent Schedule BNL Schedule Duration Liro/Gilbane Schedule Duration Pentant 1 – 21 months Pentant 5 – 21 months Pentant 2 – 20 months Pentant 3 – 20 months Pentant 4 – 19 months Injection Bldg. – 18 months RF Bldg. – 16 months Overall – 41 months • Pentant 1 – 20 months • Pentant 5 – 20 months • Pentant 2 – 21 months • Pentant 3 – 24 months • Pentant 4 – 24 months • Injection Bldg. – 26 months • RF Bldg. – 21 months • Overall – 48 months

  10. Schedule Analysis • Analysis • At NSLS II site ~$180M in work over ~48 mos = $3.75M/mo • At CFN $2.4M/mo but in 50ksf building footprint • Footprint for NSLS II is ~400ksf – 8 times the space! • As long as sequencing is correct, there is ample time to get this work done • The space available and layout enables great flexibility in sequencing work so all trades are continuously productive • APS Comparison (escalated to today's $) • APS cost $275M over 63 mo = $4.4M/mo vs $3.75M/mo for NSLS II • APS- 960ksf/63mo = 15ksf/mo vs 400ksf/48mo = 8.3ksf/mo NSLS II

  11. WBS Update • Currently Updating WBS • Construction Phase CM Deleted • LOBs Design Deferred • LOBs Separate Contract • Chilled Water Plant and Piping Separate Contracts • Simplify and Standardize • Use CSI Codes – Divisions 1-16 – map to estimates • GC to Develop Their Own Schedule • Establish GC Interface • Evaluate Performance- EVMS

  12. Schedule Summary • Schedule provides confidence that scope can be done in scheduled time • Critical path is identified • Critical dependencies are identified • Schedule risk areas identified and mitigation underway (early procurement) • Path Forward – Additional schedule development underway: • Ongoing Scheduling Updates • Input from CM during Pre-Construction • Contractor Outreach • More detailed resource loading of activities in CSI format

More Related