html5-img
1 / 24

A facility for simulating the dynamic response of materials

A facility for simulating the dynamic response of materials. High Explosives Joe Shepherd Caltech ASCI ASAP Site visit Oct. 10-11,2000. Description and goals of subproject. Molecular properties and reaction rates chemistry of nitramine reactions molecular dynamics of shock initiation

errol
Télécharger la présentation

A facility for simulating the dynamic response of materials

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A facility for simulating the dynamic response of materials High Explosives Joe Shepherd Caltech ASCI ASAP Site visit Oct. 10-11,2000

  2. Description and goals of subproject • Molecular properties and reaction rates • chemistry of nitramine reactions • molecular dynamics of shock initiation • equation of state of unreacted nitramine explosives, polymers • High explosive simulation capabilites • AMR and GFM methods for VTF • reaction mechanism reduction for detonation simulations • Engineering models of High Explosives • implement and test EoS and reaction models • cylinder test • corner turning

  3. Personnel • Postdocs • G. Caldwell (MP) • D. Chakraborty (MP) • A. Strachan (MP) • S. Sundaram* • Students • M. Arienti • C. Eckett* • P. Hung • Faculty • JE Shepherd • WG Knauss • P. Tang† • Staff • S. Dasgupta (MP) • R. Muller (MP) • E. Morano • J. Cummings † (CACR) • R. Samtaney (CT) *FY00 Alumni † FY00 additions

  4. How subproject integrates into the VTF

  5. Interactions with other subprojects • Develop engineering models of HE and provide to VTF team • Equation of state • Reaction rate • Work with SD to couple to FEM solid simulations • Develop and verify Eulerian-Lagrangian coupling schemes and provide to VTF team • Use MP reaction rate model for nitramines as input to ILDM models • Use MP Molecular Dynamics simulation for HE EoS • Work jointly with MP on shock initiation of HE

  6. Response to FY99 review • Caution is offered with respect to the use of the ILDM procedure for detonation reaction mechanism reduction …. “strategic planning” with respect to alternatives for reaction mechanism reduction is recommended. • Augmented ILDM method (induction manifold + ILDM) was successful! Method was implemented, verified, and validated against 2D detailed chemistry simulation. • Risk-taking was justified in this case - potential risk was more than offset by enormous benefits of success.

  7. Research activities in FY’00 • Detailed reaction mechanisms for nitramines • Condensed phase effects on reactions • Molecular dynamics of shock initiation • Reactive force field treatment of nitramines • Reduced reaction mechanism via ILDM • Engineering models of HE • improved product EoS, initial temperature effects • Parallel AMR-GFM method for HE simulation with realistic boundary response • Evaluation of GFM implementation schemes • transparency & acceleration tests

  8. Computational Science interactions • Use of GrACE C++ library for AMR • Manish Parashar • Use of Python to script FEM and EL test problems • Michael Aivazis • Use of POOMA solvers written as Python extensions as a PSE for EL computations • Julian Cummings.

  9. Achievements in basic science/engineering • Nitramine chemistry • detailed gas phase reaction mechanism for HMX & RDX • reactive force field developed for nitramines • molecular dynamic simulation of shock-initiated RDX • EoS of shocked HE and polymers • Reaction Mechanism Reduction • 4D ILDM computed for H2-O2-Ar • ILDM & induction manifold implemented in 2D AMR gas detonation • GFM validations • AMR + GFM implemented in 2D • 2D AMR detonation in elastic tube simulation carried out • Implemented JTF EoS model for PBX in 3D & AMR solvers

  10. Accomplishment of MP group in HE • Reaction mechanism for nitramines • HONO elimination • RDX & HMX mechanism completed • Reactive force field for nitramines • shock simulations of initiation in DMNA, RDX • Polymer EoS • computation of Gruneisen coefficients, shock Hugoniots

  11. ILDM Reaction Mechanism Reduction • 2+2 dimensional ILDM for H2-air

  12. Cellular Detonation Simulations • Self-propagating (not overdriven) cellular detonation in H2+O2+7Ar (Oran et al. 1998) • Finest grid level: 256 mesh cells across channel, 10 mesh cells per ZND induction length, AMR (Amrita)

  13. Transparency Test

  14. 2D Validation test of GFM • superseismic shock wave--elastic solid wave interaction

  15. 2D AMR + GFM • 2D AMR HMX detonation simulation • FEM Copper simulation • GFM

  16. Corner turning in HMX AMR (60x40) mesh refined twice with ratio 2, 10 processors

  17. Application of Model - T-effect in TATB • Both the detonation velocity and the CJ pressure increase as the temperature goes down • There is no performance degradation from cold in plane geometry • Performance degradation comes from the slowing down of the propagation velocity in corner turning and divergence • Performance degradation comes from larger unburned region • Reaction model with kinetics is needed to address this issue

  18. Integrated 3D Parallel Simulation • Adlib solid tantulum model, Cohen thermal EoS, J2 plasticity • RM3D fluid model with Morano MG HMX model 66 Gpa CJ pressure • ASCI Blue Pacific 1024 processors

  19. Tasks for FY00 • Materials properties • Complete reaction network for nitramines COMPLETED • Investigate via MD early events in shocked high explosives IN PROGRESS • Engineering model • Reduced reaction network for nitramines and application to 1-D and 2-D detonation Developed ILDM method in FY00 • Integration of JTF models utilizing reduced reaction networks into 3-D Eulerian code Delayed toFY01 • Integrated simulation • Develop 3-D Eulerian AMR simulations of detonation with GFM IN PROGRESS

  20. Status of Milestones for FY00 • 2-D parallel engineering model detonation calculations utilizing integrated VTF Q1 FY00  • 3-D parallel engineering model detonation simulations using AMR Q3 FY00 - in place, 2D runs only so far • Fully 3-D coupled Eulerian/Lagrangian simulation using ghost fluid method Q4 FY00  • Simulation utilizing materials database Q1 FY01 • under development

  21. Validation • AMR • backward-facing step • cylindrical shock • GFM • 1D piston tests • 1D shock transparency tests ( EL, LE) • 2D convergence and mass conservation tests • 2D cylinder lift-off test • 2D super-seismic shock wave propagation along elastic boundary • ILDM • ZND, CV,Oran et al 2D simulations • Corner-turning experiments • Cylinder test experiments • Initiation experiments We need access to high-quality data on:

  22. Leveraging • Navy MURI on Pulse Detonation Engines • Using POOMA-based FEM methods to model transient response of structures loaded by shock and detonation waves. Experimental research on elastic waves and fracture used in code validation.

  23. Plans for FY’01 • Reaction Rates and Early Events in Shocked HE • joint work with MP group, effects of high density • ILDM method for HE • apply methods developed in FY00 to nitramines • Engineering Models for HE • next generation reaction model • Integrated Simulations for HE • transfer AMR-GFM methodology to VTF • initiation, corner turning, cylinder test • validation against experiments

  24. Milestone for FY01 • Performance of a large-scale parallel simulation of detonation propagation with an advanced model of the reaction zone. Q3 FY 01. • Tasks 1. Develop revised, robust mixture equation of state 2. Implement AMR solution of multi-species reaction model 3. Develop ILDM reduced model of chemical reaction network 4. Verification and Validation testing 5. Large-scale demonstration simulation.

More Related