1 / 10

Johnson

Johnson. Nixon. Ford. Carter. Clinton. Reagan. Bush. Bush. 22%. 7%. 28%. 43%. Comparison 1965 - 2003. United States Budget. 8%. 8%. 18%. 66%. Discretionary. National Defense. Entitlements. Net Interest. -58%. +136%. +14%. -64%. ARD Air Quality Monitoring Objectives.

forbes
Télécharger la présentation

Johnson

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Johnson Nixon Ford Carter Clinton Reagan Bush . Bush

  2. 22% 7% 28% 43% Comparison 1965 - 2003 United States Budget 8% 8% 18% 66% Discretionary National Defense Entitlements Net Interest -58% +136% +14% -64%

  3. ARD Air Quality Monitoring Objectives • Provide data to make pollutant risk assessments of adverse effects to natural resources (AQRVs). • Determine compliance with NAAQS standards and critical loads • Determine trends that assist in compliance predictions, policy objectives, and regional assessments at rural parks. • Provide specific answers from special studies that assist modeling, rural pollution transport issues, SIP development, and national control strategies. • Provide timely information to protect public health in the parks Air Resources Division

  4. Monitoring Concept Changes • Three-tier monitoring: core for trends, baseline, targeted • Co-locate monitoring for efficiency and data use • Use partnerships to maximize cost sharing • Set primary objectives for each site, time frame follows • Target the monitoring by defining the information needs • Parameters and quality of data to meet the need Air Resources Division

  5. Define Monitoring by a Layered Structure Each monitor must be defined by its layer, purpose, and timeline. Air Resources Division

  6. Number Years Monitoring Data Death Valley 11 Mount Rainier Great Smoky Mountains - Cades Cove Mesa Verde 12 Great Basin Craters of the Moon Great Smoky Mountains - Clingmans Dome Channel Islands Chamizal Canyonlands Big Bend 15 Olympic Yosemite - Turtleback Dome Glacier Chiricahua Lava Beds Grand Canyon 17 Cowpens Great Smoky Mountains - Cove Mtn Yellowstone Voyageurs Rocky Mountain Pinnacles Joshua Tree Everglades Denali Cape Cod Mammoth Cave Great Smoky Mountains - Look Rock Theodore-Roosevelt Shenandoah Sequoia-Kings Canyon - Lower Kaweah Saguaro Acadia - McFarland Hill 0 5 10 15 20 25 Congaree Swamp Years of Data Air Resources Division

  7. Air Quality “Air Atlas” A geographic information system (GIS) and ozone data was used to spatially interpolate the ozone over the US. http://www2.nature.nps.gov/air/maps/AirAtlas/index.cfm Air Resources Division

  8. Air Quality Condition – Ozone Trend Air Resources Division

  9. Air Quality Scorecard Air Resources Division

  10. BADL WICA ZION PEFO Station shut down CASTNet Sites = ozone + dry deposition Minor reduction(met, 2nd site, temp monitors POMS ozone (not shown) 8 stations not funded by 2011 Cost Saving Cuts - Ozone Monitoring Air Resources Division

More Related