1 / 80

Objectives

Chapter 6. Objectives. Describe the electron-sea model of metallic bonding, and explain how the metallic bond accounts for the characteristics of metallic substances. List and describe the properties of metals .

geri
Télécharger la présentation

Objectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 6 Objectives • Describe the electron-sea model of metallic bonding, and explain how the metallic bond accounts for the characteristics of metallic substances. • List and describe the properties of metals. • Explain why metals are malleable and ductile but ionic-crystalline compound are not. • List and describe the types of Van der Waals Forces. Describe dipole-dipole forces, hydrogen bonding, induced dipoles, and London dispersion forces and their effects on properties such as boiling and melting points.

  2. Chapter 6 Objectives • Explain VSEPR theory. • Predict/Explain the shapes of molecules using VSEPR theory. • Explain how the shapes of molecules are accounted for by hybridization theory.

  3. Explain why scientists use resonance structures to represent some molecules. • Explain the relationships among potential energy, distance between approaching atoms, bond length, bond stability, and bond energy.

  4. Section4 Metallic Bonding Chapter 6 Metallic Bonding • Chemical bonding is different in metals than it is in ionic, molecular, or covalent-network compounds (network solids). • The unique characteristics of metallic bonding gives metals their characteristic properties, as such • electrical conductivity • thermal conductivity • malleability • ductility • Luster • sectility

  5. Section4 Metallic Bonding Chapter 6 The Metallic-Bond Model • In a metal, the vacant orbitals in the atoms’ outer energy levels overlap. • This overlapping of orbitals allows the outer electrons of the atoms to roam freely throughout the entire metal (mobile valence electrons). • The electrons are delocalized,which means that they do not belong to any one atom but move freely about the metal’s network of empty atomic orbitals. • These mobile electrons form a sea of electronsaround the metal atoms, which are packed together in a crystal lattice.

  6. Section4 Metallic Bonding Chapter 6 The Metallic-Bond Model, continued • The chemical bonding that results from the attraction between metal atoms kernel (which are positively charged) and the surrounding sea of shared valence electrons(which are negatively charged) is calledmetallic bonding. • When metal atoms bond to other metal atoms, their valence electrons do not seem to belong to any individual atom but rather they are “group shared” and are free to roam from atom to atom throughout the entire metal crystal. • The strength of the binding forces between the “sea of shared valence” and the kernels of the metal atoms directly impacts properties such as ductility, malleability , and sectility. The stronger the binding action, the harder the metal sample will be.

  7. Visual Concepts Chapter 6 Metallic Bonding

  8. Visual Concepts Chapter 6 Properties of Metals: Surface Appearance

  9. Visual Concepts Chapter 6 Properties of Metals: Malleability and Ductility

  10. Visual Concepts Chapter 6 Properties of Metals: Electrical and Thermal Conductivity

  11. Section5 Van der Waals Chapter 6 Intermolecular Forces • The forces of attraction between molecules are known as intermolecular forces ,aka, the Van der Waals Forces. • The boiling point of a liquid is a good measure of the intermolecular forces between its molecules: the higher the boiling point, the stronger the forces between the molecules. • Intermolecular forces vary in strength but are weaker than bonds between atoms within molecules, ions in ionic compounds, or metal atoms in solid metals. • Boiling points for ionic compounds and metals tend to be much higher than those for molecular substances: forces between molecules are weaker than those between metal atoms or ions.

  12. Section5 Van der Waals Chapter 6 Categories of Intermolecular Forces (IMFs) • The forces of attraction between molecules are known as intermolecular forces ,aka, the Van der Waals Forces. Hydrogen Bonds- formed between polar molecules that have hydrogen bonded directly to fluorine, oxygen, or nitrogen in the molecule. Dipole –Dipole Interactive Forces- formed between polar molecules that do not have hydrogen bonding ability. London Dispersion Forces- formed between nonpolar molecules

  13. Section5 Van der Waals Chapter 6 Intermolecular Forces, continued • The strongest intermolecular forces exist between polar molecules capable of hydrogen bonding. • Because of their uneven charge distribution, polar molecules have dipoles. Adipoleis created by equal but opposite charges that are separated by a short distance (i.e. an uneven distribution of charge).

  14. Van der Waals Chapter 6 Intermolecular Forces, continued • A dipole is represented by an arrow with its head pointing toward the negative pole and a crossed tail at the positive pole. The dipole created by a hydrogen chloride molecule is indicated as follows: • d+ • d-

  15. Section5 Van der Waals Chapter 6 Hydrogen Bonding • Some hydrogen-containing compounds have unusually high boiling points. This is explained by a particularly strong type of dipole-dipole force. • In compounds containing H–F, H–O, or H–N bonds, the large electronegativity differences between hydrogen atoms and the atoms they are bonded to make their bonds highly polar. • This gives the hydrogen atom a positive charge that is almost half as large as that of a bare proton.

  16. Section5 Van der Waals Chapter 6 Hydrogen Bonding • The small size of the hydrogen atom allows the atom to come very close to an unshared pair of electrons in an adjacent molecule. • The intermolecular force in which a hydrogen atom that is bonded to a highly electronegative atom is attracted to an unshared pair of electrons of an electronegative atom in a nearby molecule is known as hydrogen bonding.

  17. Section5 Van der Waals Chapter 6 Hydrogen Bonding • Hydrogen bonds are represented by dotted lines connecting the hydrogen-bonded hydrogen to the unshared electron pair of the electronegative atom to which it is attracted. • An excellent example of hydrogen bonding is that which occurs between water molecules. The strong hydrogen bonding between water molecules accounts for many of water’s characteristic properties.

  18. Visual Concepts Chapter 6 Hydrogen Bonding

  19. Section5 Van der Waals Chapter 6 Impacts of Hydrogen Bonding • molecules capable of Hydrogen Bonding generally have…. • Higher boiling points • Higher melting points • Decreased vapor pressures • Higher heat of vaporization • Lower density in solid state than in liquid state compared to other molecules.

  20. Section5 Molecular Geometry Chapter 6 Dipole-Dipole Interactive Forces • The negative region in one polar molecule attracts the positive region in adjacent molecules. So the molecules all attract each other from opposite sides. • Such forces of attraction between polar molecules are known asdipole-dipole forces. • Dipole-dipole forces , like in all IMFs, act at short range, only between nearby molecules. • In general, dipole-dipole forces are weaker than hydrogen bonds but stronger than London bonds. • Dipole-dipole forces explain, for example the difference between the boiling points of iodine chloride, I–Cl (97°C), and bromine, Br–Br (59°C).

  21. Visual Concepts Chapter 6 Dipole-Dipole Forces

  22. Section5 Van der Waals Chapter 6 Comparing Dipole-Dipole Forces

  23. Section5 Van der Waals Chapter 6 Induced Dipoles • A polar molecule can induce a dipole in a nonpolar molecule by temporarily attracting its electrons. • The result is a short-range intermolecular force that is somewhat weaker than the dipole-dipole force. • Induced dipoles account for the fact that a nonpolar molecule, oxygen, O2, is able to dissolve in water, a polar molecule.

  24. Visual Concepts Chapter 6 Dipole-Induced Dipole Interaction

  25. Section5 Van der Waals Chapter 6 London Dispersion Forces • Even noble gas atoms and nonpolar molecules can experience weak intermolecular attraction. • In any atom or molecule—polar or nonpolar—the electrons are in continuous motion. • As a result, at any instant the electron distribution may be uneven. A momentary uneven charge can create a positive pole at one end of an atom of molecule and a negative pole at the other. This phenomenon is known as a momentary or temporary dipole.

  26. Section5 Van der Waals Chapter 6 London Dispersion Forces, continued • This temporary dipole can then induce a dipole in an adjacent atom or molecule. The two are held together for an instant by the weak attraction between temporary dipoles. • The intermolecular attractions resulting from the constant motion of electrons and the creation of momentary dipoles are calledLondon dispersion forces. • London Bonds are the weakest of the IMFs and all bonds. • Fritz London first proposed their existence in 1930.

  27. Visual Concepts Chapter 6 London Dispersion Force

  28. Section5 Van der Waals Chapter 6 Comparing Strengths of IMFs • Hydrogen bonds are the strongest of the IMFs. • The strength of the hydrogen bond increases as the electronegativity of the atom to which hydrogen is covalently bonded to in a molecule increases. • The strength of the hydrogen bond decreases as the size of the atom to which hydrogen is covalently bonded increases. • Dipole –dipole forces are, in general, weaker than hydrogen bonds but stronger than London Bonds. • London Bonds are the weakest of the IMFs and all bonds.

  29. Section5 Van der Waals Chapter 6 Comparing Strengths of IMFs • In a group of related molecules ( polar or nonpolar) the strength of the Van der Waals forces increases as molecular mass increases. • This is due to more electrons being available to increase the intensity of any dipoles present in a molecule. • The strength of any Van der Waals Force increases as the distance between bonding molecules decreases.

  30. Section5 Molecular Geometry Chapter 6 Molecular Geometry • The properties or behaviors of molecules depend not only on the bonding of atoms but also on molecular geometry:the three-dimensional arrangement of a molecule’s atoms. • The polarity of each bond, along with the geometry of the molecule, determinesmolecular polarity,or the uneven distribution of charges due to molecular shape. • Molecular polarity strongly influences the forces that act between molecules in liquids and solids. • A chemical formula, by itself, reveals little information about a molecule’s geometry.

  31. Section5 Molecular Geometry Chapter 6 Molecular Geometry 2 methods are used to make determinations of molecular geometry • VSEPR Theory • Central atom bonding character (Hybridization Theory) Either of these methods can be used, in conjunction or independently, to correctly determine a molecule’s 3-dimensional shape.

  32. Section5 Molecular Geometry Chapter 6 VSEPR Theory • As shown at right, diatomic molecules, like those of (a)hydrogen, H2, and (b)hydrogen chloride, HCl, can only be linear because they consist of only two atoms. • To predict the geometries of more-complicated molecules, one must consider the locations of all electron pairs surrounding the bonding atoms. This is the basis of VSEPR theory.

  33. Section5 Molecular Geometry Chapter 6 VSEPR Theory • The abbreviation VSEPR (say it “VES-pur”) stands for “valence-shell electron-pair repulsion.” • VSEPR theorystates that repulsion between the sets of valence-level electrons surrounding a “central” atom causes these sets to be oriented as far apart as possible. (Repelled to maximum distance) • example: BeH2 • The central beryllium atom is surrounded by only the two electron pairs it shares with the hydrogen atoms. • According to VSEPR, the shared pairs will be as far away from each other as possible, so the bonds to hydrogen will be 180° apart from each other. • The molecule will therefore be linear: H-Be-H

  34. Section5 Molecular Geometry Chapter 6 VSEPR Theory VSEPR “combos” ( # of Atoms bonded to central atom / # of lone pairs on central Atom) • 2/0 = linear • 2/1= bent or angular • 2/2= bent or angular • 3/0= trigonal planar (triangular) • 3/1= trigonal pyramidal (pyramid) • 4/0= tetrahedral • 5/0= trigonal bipyramidal ****** • 6/0= octahedral ****** *****Note- These geometries involve the expanded valence shell ( expanded “octet” ).

  35. Visual Concepts Chapter 6 Lone Pair of Electrons

  36. Visual Concepts Chapter 6 VSEPR and Basic Molecular Shapes

  37. Visual Concepts Chapter 6 VSEPR and Lone Electron Pairs

  38. Section5 Molecular Geometry Chapter 6 VSEPR Theory, continued • Sample Problem E • Use VSEPR theory to predict the molecular geometry of boron trichloride, BCl3. Boron trichloride has a 3/0 VSEPR combo. Its geometry therefore is trigonal planar.

  39. Section5 Molecular Geometry Chapter 6 VSEPR Theory, continued • VSEPR theory can also account for the geometries of molecules with unshared electron pairs. • examples:ammonia, NH3, and water, H2O. • The Lewis structure of ammonia shows that the central nitrogen atom has an unshared electron pair: • Ammonia’s VSEPR combo is 3/1 and therefore its geometry is trigonal pyramidal.

  40. Section5 Molecular Geometry Chapter 6 VSEPR Theory, continued • The shape of a molecule refers to the positions of atoms only (lone pairs are NOT included in the geometry). • H2O has a 2/2 VSEPR combo, and therefore its molecular geometry is “bent,” or angular.

  41. Section5 Molecular Geometry Chapter 6 VSEPR Theory, continued • Sample Problem F • Use VSEPR theory to predict the shape of a molecule of carbon dioxide, CO2. • The VSEPR combo is 2/0 therefore the geometry is • linear.

  42. Molecular Polarity Chapter 6 Molecular Polarity • In terms of their overall electron distribution (negative charge), molecules are considered to be either polar (uneven distribution) or nonpolar ( even distribution). • Diatomic Molecules (molecules consisting of only two atoms) • In any diatomic molecule , the polarity of the bond between the two atoms will determine the polarity of the molecule. • If the bond is polar, the molecule will be polar. • If the bond is nonpolar, the molecule will be nonpolar.

  43. Chapter 6 Molecular Polarity Molecular Polarity • Molecules consisting of more than 2 atoms • In these molecules, the type(s) of covalent bonds within the molecule along with the molecular geometry (in most cases) must be taken into consideration in determining the polarity of the molecule. • If all the bonds within a molecule are nonpolar, the molecule will be nonpolar. (Molecular shape plays no role in determining polarity.) • If only one of the bonds in a molecule is polar, the molecule will be polar. (Molecular shape plays no role in determining polarity.)

  44. Chapter 6 Molecular Polarity Molecular Polarity • When 2 or more of the bonds in a molecule are polar, the molecule’s geometry or shape plays a major role in determining the molecule’s polarity. • Symmetrical Geometries that generally lead to nonpolarity in molecules: • Linear, trigonal planar, tetrahedral, trigonal bipyramidal • octahedral. • These shapes allow the dipoles in a molecule to cancel each other • out as long as the molecule retains its symmetry. • ***Note- If all of the bonds in the molecule are not exactly the same then the shape will become distorted and no longer allow polar bonds to cancel resulting in the molecule being polar.

  45. Chapter 6 Molecular Polarity Molecular Polarity • Asymmetrical Geometries that generally lead to polarity in molecules: • Bent/Angular, trigonal pyramidal . • These shapes will NOT allow any dipoles in a molecule to cancel each other. • ***Note- Distortion effects are inconsequential as these shapes are already inherently asymmetrical. • REMEMBER molecular polarity must originate with polar bonds!!!!! • In other words, NO polar bonds in a molecule = nonpolar molecule

  46. Chapter 6 Hybridization • Hybridization Theory is used to explain how the valence shell orbitals of an atom are rearranged when some atoms form covalent bonds. • Hybridizationinvolves the blending of two or more valence shell orbitals of similar energies to produce new hybrid atomic orbitals of equal energies. • Hybridization involves two events: promotion followed immediately by hybridization.

  47. Chapter 6 Hybridization (cont.) Promotion involves the “unpairing “ of any valence shell orbitals that contain an orbital pairing as one of the electrons is sent to an empty orbital in the same valence shell. Hybridization immediately follows promotion as the valence shell orbitals are rearranged (blended) to create new equal energy hybrid orbitals. The new hybrid orbitals are named after the types and numbers of valence shell orbitals that were directly involved in the hybridization. ex. Carbon is sp3 hybridized in covalent bondings. One s orbital and three p orbitals are involved in creating the four equal energy sp3 hybrid orbitals.

  48. Chapter 6 Central Atom “Bonding Character” The bonding character of any central atom in a molecule can be used to predict molecular geometries of molecules. This method of predicting the shape of molecules involves describing the kinds of orbitals directly involved in the formation of covalent bonds. Because many of the central atoms involve hybrid orbitals in covalent bond formation, it is also known as hybridization theory. s bonding= linear ex: hydrogen p bonding= linear ex: group 17 elements ***Please note that these are not playing role of central atom.

  49. Chapter 6 Central Atom “Bonding Character” p2 bonding= bent/angular ex: group 16 nonmetals p3 bonding, bonding 2 atoms = bent/angular ex: group 15 nonmetals p3 bonding, bonding 3 atoms = trigonal pyramidal ex: group 15 nonmetals ***Please note that these are not involving hybridized central atoms.

  50. Chapter 6 Central Atom “Bonding Character” sp bonding= linear ex: Beryllium sp2 bonding, bonding 2 atoms = linear ex: Boron sp2 bonding, bonding 3 atoms = trigonal planar ex: Boron sp3 bonding, bonding 2 atoms = linear ex: group 14 nonmetals sp3 bonding, bonding 3 atoms = trigonal planar ex: group 14 nonmetals sp3 bonding, bonding 4 atoms = tetrahedral ex: group 14 nonmetals ***Please note that these are involving hybridized central atoms.

More Related