SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Shared Services

gordy avatar
16 diapositives · 370 Views · Jul 24, 2014

Shared Services. Perspectives from a Practitioner. Advantages of Scale. Minimize Redundancy Optimize Supervisory Ratios Maximize Utilization of Major Capital Goods Optimize Resource Scheduling Promote Specialization of Labor Promote Standardization/Interchangeability.

Shared Services - slide 1
01 / 16Shared Services
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Shared Services
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Shared Services Perspectives from a Practitioner

  2. Advantages of Scale • Minimize Redundancy • Optimize Supervisory Ratios • Maximize Utilization of Major Capital Goods • Optimize Resource Scheduling • Promote Specialization of Labor • Promote Standardization/Interchangeability

  3. Disadvantages of Scale • Bureaucracy • Depersonalization • Homogenation of Service Levels • Culture Clashes

  4. Consolidation vs. Sharing Consolidation Shared Services Changeable Continued Sense of Place Multiple Pricing Models Complicates Decisions Retention of Political Structure • Permanent • Loss of Identity • Inflexible Pricing Structure • Simplifies Decisions • Loss of Political Control

  5. The Pricing Problem • Distribution of Demand Differs From Distribution of Value (e.g. North Plainfield: 7.4% of Police; 3% of Value) • Savings Not Distributed Fairly If Assessments Used For Cost Allocation • Baseline Method Okay Initially, Difficult To Adjust In Future Years • Budget Approvals Complex

  6. Case Study Somerset Police Services

  7. Somerset County Data • Population: 320,000 • Land Area: 305 Square Miles • Density: 1050 per Sq. Mile (NJ Ave: 1175) • Ave. Eq. Tax Rate: 1.72 (NJ Ave. 1.76) • Eq. Value per Cap: $192,000 (NJ: $150,000) • HH Income: 140% of NJ Average

  8. Somerset Police Data • 19 Municipal Departments • County Prosecutor & Sheriff Support • 647Sworn Officers • Estimated Budget: $94.6 Million • Crimes per 1,000 Pop.: 14.9 • Violent Crimes per 1,000: 0.9 • Crimes per Sworn Officer: 6.7

  9. Current Shared Services • Emergency 911 • Dispatch • Criminal Investigation • Specialty Squads (SWAT, Dive, Arson etc.) • Training Academy • Jail Operations • Prisoner Transport

  10. Literature Review • USDOJ National Report on Local Police • IACP Report on Consolidation • NJSACP Report on Consolidation • Case Studies on Existing Regional Depts. • NJ Uniform Crime Report • Other State UCR Documents • NJDCA Docs on Consolidation

  11. Legal Issues • Uniform Shared Services and Consolidation Act • Performance Standards • Cost Allocation • Local Referendum • Personnel • Seniority Retention • Integration of Labor Contracts

  12. Comparative Analysis I

  13. Comparative Analysis II

  14. Concept Plan • Establish County Wide Police Department • Organize with 3 Precincts (North, Central & South) • Potential for Phased Implementation • Physical Consolidation into 3 Facilities • All Support at County Locations • Attrition-Based Staffing Changes • PERC Assistance with Contract Integration

  15. Related Issues • Increased Unit Costs • Salaries • Benefits • Future Pension Liability Distribution

  16. Other Somerset Cases • Tax Assessment • Municipal Courts • Construction Code