1 / 13

Fig. S1

Fig. S1. Fig. S1 Correlation between microarray and qRT-PCR expression analyses. The linear regression compares expression ratios of salinity to control treatment measured by qRT-PCR and the citrus cDNA microarray. Fig. S2.

Télécharger la présentation

Fig. S1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fig. S1 Fig. S1 Correlation between microarray and qRT-PCR expression analyses. The linear regression compares expression ratios of salinity to control treatment measured by qRT-PCR and the citrus cDNA microarray.

  2. Fig. S2 Fig. S2 Venn diagrams showing the distribution of the significant differentially expressed unigenes in salt-stressed Carrizo citrange and Cleopatra mandarin rootstocks.

  3. Carrizo citrange Fig. S3 Cluster analysis of gene expression profiles in Carrizo citrange

  4. Cleopatra mandarin Fig. S4 Cluster analysis of gene expression profiles in Cleopatra mandarin

  5. Fig. S5 Analysis of Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences (MIPS) functional categories of all genes significantly induced or repressed in salt-stressed Carrizo citrange and Cleopatra mandarin rootstocks. The percentage is based upon the number of unigenes in each set.

  6. Fig. S6Expression profiles of unigenes encoding peroxidases in response to salt treatments obtained from microarray hybridizations. Intensities are expressed relative to the corresponding control value.

  7. Carrizo KCl Carrizo NaCl Cleopatra KCl Cleopatra NaCl Fig. S7Expression profiles of unigenes encoding chitinases in response to salt treatments obtained from microarray hybridizations. Intensities are expressed relative to the corresponding control value.

  8. (A) (B) (C) (D) Fig. S8Expression profiles of unigenes involved in Jasmonic Acid biosynthesis in response to salt treatments obtained from microarray hybridizations and qRT-PCR. Intensities are expressed relative to the corresponding control value. The figure continues in the following page.

  9. (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) Fig. S8 (continued).

  10. Fig. S9Expression profiles of unigenes involved in ethylene biosynthesis in response to salt treatments obtained from microarray hybridizations. Intensities are expressed relative to the corresponding control value.

  11. Fig. S10Expression profiles of unigenes involved in photosynthesis-light reactions in response to salt treatments obtained from microarray hybridizations. Intensities are expressed relative to the corresponding control value.

  12. Fig. S11Real time RT-PCR expression of representative genes in Carrizo seedlings exposed to NaCl and KCl stress during 2, 5, 7 and 12 weeks treatments. Intensities are expressed in relation to the corresponding control value. Values are means (n=4) ±SD.

  13. Fig. S12 Photosynthetic inhibition in NaCl-treated Carrizo and Cleopatra rootstocks. Different gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters are presented in control and NaCl-treated seedlings.Photosynthetic efficiency data are mean values of eight independent measurements ± standard errors. Fluorescence quantum yield in light-adapted leaves (FPSII) are mean values of 36 independent measurements ± standard errors

More Related