1 / 65

The Chi-Square test

The Chi-Square test. 2. Assistant prof. Dr. Mayasah A. Sadiq FICMS-FM. DATA. QUALITATIVE. QUANTITATIVE. CHI SQUARE TEST. T-TEST. The most obvious difference between the chi‑square tests and the other hypothesis tests we have considered (T test) is the nature of the data.

laniers
Télécharger la présentation

The Chi-Square test

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Chi-Square test 2 Assistant prof. Dr. Mayasah A. Sadiq FICMS-FM

  2. DATA QUALITATIVE QUANTITATIVE CHI SQUARE TEST T-TEST

  3. The most obvious difference between the chi‑square tests and the other hypothesis tests we have considered (T test) is the nature of the data. • For chi‑square, the data are frequenciesrather than numerical scores.

  4. Chi-squared Tests • For testing significance of patterns in qualitative data. • Test statistic is based on counts that represent the number of items that fall in each category • Test statistics measures the agreement between actual counts(observed) and expected counts assuming the null hypothesis

  5. Chi Square FORMULA:

  6. Chi square distribution

  7. Applications of Chi-square test: • Goodness-of-fit • The 2 x 2 chi-square test (contingency table, four fold table) • The a x b chi-square test (r x c chi-square test)

  8. Steps of CHI hypothesis testing • 1. Data :counts or proportion. • 2. Assumption: random sample selected from a population. • 3. HO :no sign. Difference in proportion • no significant association. • HA: sign. Difference in proportion • significant association.

  9. 4. level of sign. • df 1st application=k-1(k is no. of groups) • df 2nd &3rd application=(column-1)(row-1) • IN 2nd application(conengency table) • Df=1, tab. Chi= 3.841 always • Graph is one side (only +ve)

  10. 5. apply appropriate test of significance

  11. 6. Statistical decision & 7. Conclusion • Calculated chi <tabulated chi • P>0.05 • Accept HO,(may be true) • If calculated chi> tabulated chi • P<0.05 • Reject HO& accept HA.

  12. The Chi-Square Test for Goodness-of-Fit • The chi-square test for goodness-of-fit uses frequency data from a sample to test hypotheses about the shape or proportions of a population. • The data, called observed frequencies, simply count how many individuals from the sample are in each category.

  13. Example • Eye colour in a sample of 40 • Blue 12,brown 21,green 3,others 4 • Eye colour in population • Brown 80% • Blue 10% • Green 2% • Others 8% • Is there any difference between proportion of sample to that of population .use α0.05

  14. Observed counts(frequency)

  15. Expected counts(frequency) • Expected blue10/100*40=4 • Expected brown=80/100*40=32 • Expexcted green=2/100*40=0.8 • Expected others=8/100*40=3

  16. 1. Data • Represents the eye colour of 40 person in the following distribution • Brown=21 person,blue=12 person,green=3,others=4

  17. 2. Assumption • Sample is randomly selected from the population.

  18. 3. Hypothesis • Null hypothesis: there is no significant difference in proportion of eye colour of sample to that of the population. • Alternative hypothesis: there is significant difference in proportion of eye colour of sample to that of the population.

  19. 4. Level of significance; (α =0.05); • 5% Chance factor effect area • 95% Influencing factor effect area • d.f.(degree of freedom)=K-1; (K=Number of subgroups) • =4-1=3 • D.f. for 0.5=7.81

  20. 7.81 Accept Ho Influencing factor effect area 95% Reject Ho Chance factor effect area 5% 5%

  21. 5. Apply a proper test of significance

  22. Chi Square FORMULA:

  23. Observed counts(frequency)

  24. Expected counts(frequency) • Expected blue=10/100*40=4 • Expected brown=80/100*40=32 • Expexcted green=2/100*40=0.8 • Expected others=8/100*40=3

  25. =(12-4)² (21-32)² (3-0.8)² (4-3)² • ------------ +---------- +----------- + -------- • 4 32 0.8 3 • =(64/4) + (121/32)+(4.8/0.8)+(1/3) • =16+3.78+6+0.3= • Calculated chi =26.08

  26. 7.81 Accept Ho Influencing factor effect area 95% Reject Ho Chance factor effect area 5% 5%

  27. 6. Statistical decision • Calculated chi> tabulated chi • P<0.5

  28. 7. Conclusion • We reject H0 &accept HA: there is significant difference in proportion of eye colour of sample to that of the population.

  29. Applications of Chi-square test: • Goodness-of-fit • The 2 x 2 chi-square test (contingency table, four fold table) • The a x b chi-square test (r x c chi-square test)

  30. The Chi-Square Test for Independence • The second chi-square test, the chi-square test for independence, can be used and interpreted in two different ways: 1. Testing hypotheses about the relationship between two variables in a population, or(2×2) 2. Testing hypotheses about differences between proportions for two or more populations.(a×b)

  31. The Chi-Square Test for Independence (cont.) • The data, called observed frequencies, simply show how many individuals from the sample are in each cell of the matrix. • The null hypothesis for this test states that there is no relationship between the two variables; that is, the two variables are independent.

  32. 2× 2 chi square (contingency table )

  33. The Chi-Square Test for Independence (cont.) The calculation of chi-square is the same for all chi-square tests:

  34. Chi Square FORMULA:

  35. 2nd application

  36. Example • A total 1500 workers on 2 operators(A&B) • Were classified as deaf & non-deaf according to the following table.is there association between deafness & type of operator .let α 0.05

  37. Result notdeaf. total deaf Operator A 100 900 1000 B 60 440 500 total 160 1340 1500

  38. Result notdeaf. total deaf Operator A 100 900 1000 B 60 440 500 total 160 1340 1500 Total number of items=1500 Total number of defective items=160

  39. Result notdef. total def Operator A 100 900 1000 B 60 440 500 total 160 1340 1500 Expected deaf from Operator A = 1000 * 160/1500 = 106.7 (expected not deaf=1000-106.7=893.3) Expected deaf from Operator B = 500 * 160/1500 = 53.3

  40. notdef. total def Operator 1000 A 100 900 B 60 440 500 total 160 1340 1500 Expected notdef. total def Operator A 106.7 893.3 B 53.3 446.7 total Result

  41. 1. Data • Represent 1500 workers,1000 on operator A 100 of them were deaf while 500 on operator B 60 of them were deaf

  42. 2. Assumption • Sample is randomly selected from the population.

  43. 3. Hypothesis • HO: there is no significant association between type of operator & deafness. • HA:there is significant association between type of operator & deafness.

  44. 4. Level of significance; (α = 0.05); • 5% Chance factor effect area • 95% Influencing factor effect area • d.f.(degree of freedom)=(r-1)(c-1) =(2-1)(2-1)=1 • D.f. 1 for 0.05=3.841

  45. 3.841 Accept Ho Influencing factor effect area 95% Reject Ho Chance factor effect area 5% 5%

More Related