1 / 5

Enhancing Road Data Systems: User-Centric Approaches to Intelligent Transport Solutions

This document explores the objectives and user requirements for developing intelligent access systems within road networks. It emphasizes the importance of harmonizing road data and ensuring consistent road centerline precision. Key areas of focus include identifying compatibility issues between datasets, conducting gap analyses, and presenting tactical vs. strategic solutions. Various agency collaborations and funding considerations are discussed, with a budgetary proposal for improving data capture standards and maintenance workflows. Overall, the aim is to advance road knowledge bases and develop a robust business case for improved infrastructure management.

lara-bond
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Road Data Systems: User-Centric Approaches to Intelligent Transport Solutions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Routable Road Centreline What do users want ? Intelligent Access System (Roads) OBJECTIVES Road knowledge-base Intelligent Transport System Consistent Road Centreline Harmonised Road Data Precision

  2. STEPS Compatibility Issues between Datasets Road Study Gap Analysis Identify User Requirements Identify Possible Solutions Tactical VS Strategic Road Group Presentations Map Business Processes Develop Term of Reference for Roads Group Agency Relationships Business Case Workflows Funding for Business Case $25,000 for comparison of MRWA & LG data ?

  3. ISSUES Geometry Flow Direction Events Feature Characteristics Road Direction Speed Limit Direct Editing Crowd Sourcing Naming Data Road Updates Incremental Update Address Creation Model Feature ID join Address Ranges Trickle Fees Landgate Funding MRWA Data Road Centrelines Precision WALIS Geometry MetaData Data Use IP Capture Standards Budget Maintenance Priorities Commercialisation Which dataset to evolve into RRCN Digitising Standards for capture

  4. AGENCY REQUIREMENTS Other ? WA Police Anomaly Feedback to Landgate FESA Address Range Capture Speed Limit Need Tracks PTA Roads in DEC estate Road Width DEC Bus Routes Spatial Accuracy Route Analysis Road names Landgate Context to other Topo Data Names Database Thematic Mapping (Spatial) Local Government Grants Commission Asset Management (Attributes) Main Roads WA Curb Subset of Roads Data Events Management (SLK) Sealed / Unsealed Area Info Funding Model for new infrastructure Flow Direction

  5. AGENCY Relationship FESA WAPOL DEC LANDGATE PTA MRWA LGA

More Related