1 / 13

Understanding Participative Decision Making (PDM): Benefits and Challenges

This overview of Participative Decision Making (PDM) explores its advantages and disadvantages. PDM can lead to positive outcomes like greater information sharing, diverse approaches, and increased acceptance of decisions. However, challenges such as premature conclusions, individual dominance, and conflicting ideas may arise. The Vroom-Yetton model highlights when to effectively implement PDM within groups. Key components for success include trained participants, communication, trust, and active participation. Learning to manage discussions and facilitate consensus is crucial for effective teamwork and decision-making.

mariah
Télécharger la présentation

Understanding Participative Decision Making (PDM): Benefits and Challenges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. POSITIVE RESULTS | | | | | | | | | NEGATIVE RESULTS YOUR GROUPS

  2. TEAMS (AI) (GII) HIERARCHICAL PDM TEAM

  3. HIERARCHICALTEAM (AI) GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL TASK TASK TASK TASK TASK TASK “TEAMWORK IS A LOT OF PEOPLE DOING WHAT I SAY.” (MKT.EXEC, CITRIX CORPORATION)

  4. PARTICIPATIVE DECISION MAKING(PDM) POSSIBLE ADVANTAGES: • GREATER INFORMATION • MORE APPROACHES • INCREASED ACCEPTANCE • BETTER COMPREHENSION OF DECISION

  5. PDM POSSIBLE DISADVANTAGES: • PREMATURE DECISIONS • INDIVIDUAL DOMINATION • CONFLICTING SOLUTIONS • PRIOR COMMITMENT • AMBIGUOUS RESPONSIBILITY

  6. PDM +OR -? • DISAGREEMENT • CONFLICTS • TAKING RISKS • TIME REQUIREMENTS

  7. PDM WHEN TO USE? VROOM-YETTON MODEL

  8. PDMWHEN TO USE(NORMAN MEIER) GROUP CONFERENCE LEADERSHIP HIGH ACCEPTANCE FLIP COIN EXPERT/ LEADER LOW LOW HIGH QUALITY

  9. PDMPRECONDITION: ***TRAINED GROUP*** • COMMUNICATION • TRUST • ACTIVE • TAKE RESPONSIBILITY • PROBLEM SOLVING

  10. COMPONENTS OF PDM • LEADER • SELECT PARTICIPANTS (QUALIFIED) • STATE CONSTRAINTS • LEADER NOT STATE OPINION

  11. PROTECT QUALITY PROTECT ACCEPTANCE MANAGE VOCAL PEOPLE DRAW OUT QUIET MANAGE MEETING COMPONENTS OF PDM

  12. Listen to understand Willingness to change position All members generally participating Trying out new ideas on each other Finding stimulation in disagreement Interacting and reaching consensus PDM: EFFECTIVE ACTIVITIES

  13. Selling preferred opinions Listening to refute/not listening at all Defending one’s position to the end A few members dominating Reacting unfavorably to disagreement Converting others by 1-to-1 attempts PDM: INEFFECTIVE ACTIVITIES

More Related