1 / 6

Kudo-Saito, et al Supplementary Figure 1

Kudo-Saito, et al Supplementary Figure 1. Human PBMCs. Debris Dead cells. Leukocytes. Lymphocytes. Kudo-Saito, et al Supplementary Figure 2. Mock D6 D10 F3 F5 NC. Transfectants. Normalization. (a). 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0. Snail. Snail Slug Twist E-cadherin Fibronectin

morty
Télécharger la présentation

Kudo-Saito, et al Supplementary Figure 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Kudo-Saito, et al Supplementary Figure 1 Human PBMCs Debris Dead cells Leukocytes Lymphocytes

  2. Kudo-Saito, et al Supplementary Figure 2 Mock D6 D10 F3 F5 NC Transfectants Normalization (a) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Snail Snail Slug Twist E-cadherin Fibronectin MMP2 Collagen IV GAPDH 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 E-cadherin 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Mock D6 D10 F3 F5 Fibronectin (b) Panc1-mock D6-snail+ D10-snail+ F3-snail+ F5-snail+ Morphology Snail E-cadherin Fibronectin (c) Proliferation Adhesion Invasion 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 400 300 200 100 0 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 No. of cells Absorbance (570nm) Mock D6 D10 F3 F5 Absorbance (450-655nm) Mock D6 D10 F3 F5 Mock D6 D10 F3 F5

  3. Kudo-Saito, et al Supplementary Figure 3 Snail transfectants (a) CCL2 LCN2 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Mock E9 H6 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Snail CCL2 LCN2 GAPDH ng/ml Mock E9 H6 Mock E9 H6 Control Snail CCL2 #1 CCL2 #2 Mock CCL2 LCN2 H6 + siRNA (b) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 ng/ml Snail CCL2 LCN2 GAPDH Control Snail CCL2 Mock Control Snail CCL2 Mock H6 + siRNA H6 + siRNA (c) H6 + siRNA F10-mock Control Snail CCL2 12.25 62.47 17.78 19.40 Foxp3 in CD4+ cells

  4. Kudo-Saito, et al Supplementary Figure 4 B16-F10 tumors (a) (b) Control siRNA-snail siRNA-CCL2 600 400 200 0 1.15 2.53 3.61 1.67 5.13 4.48 CD4 Tumor volume (mm3) CD8 Control Snail CCL2 60% (816) 64% (466) 62% (630) B16-F10 + siRNA Foxp3 in CD4+ cells (c) 81% (535) 79% (2058) 78% (1984) 800 600 400 200 0 IFN-γ (pg/ml) Gp70 tetramer in CD8+ cells 2.67 9.13 18.36 Control Snail CCL2 I-A(b) 1.49 0.61 5.42 B16-F10 + siRNA CD11c

  5. Kudo-Saito, et al Supplementary Figure 5 H6-snail+ tumors F10-mock Control siRNA-snail siRNA-CCL2 1.15 0.07 1.17 1.85 CD4 1.67 0.13 2.38 2.09 CD8 60.43 (816) 81.67 (1430) 82.17 (1180) 74.91 (1150) Foxp3 in CD4+ cells 81.29 (535) 13.34 (289) 64.92 (1521) 71.38 (2231) Gp70 tetramer in CD8+ cells 2.67 1.05 5.99 4.12 I-A(b) 1.49 2.18 16.62 10.26 CD11c

  6. Kudo-Saito, et al Supplementary Figure 6 Snail+ cancer cell undergoing EMT Enhancement of cancer invasion LCN2 release (autocrine) CCL2 release Recruitment of CD4lowFOXP3+CCR2+ Treg Induction of CD4+FOXP3+ Treg Induction of CD11c+HLA-DRlow DCreg Inhibition of CTL induction

More Related