1 / 48

Electron Spectroscopy for Surface Analysis

Electron Spectroscopy for Surface Analysis. Introduction XPS Background XPS Instrument How Does XPS Technology Work? Auger Electron Cylindrical Mirror Analyzer (CMA) Equation KE versus BE Spectrum Background Identification of XPS Peaks X-rays vs. e - Beam XPS Technology. Outline.

neorah
Télécharger la présentation

Electron Spectroscopy for Surface Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electron Spectroscopy for Surface Analysis

  2. Introduction XPS Background XPS Instrument How Does XPS Technology Work? Auger Electron Cylindrical Mirror Analyzer (CMA) Equation KE versus BE Spectrum Background Identification of XPS Peaks X-rays vs. e- Beam XPS Technology Outline

  3. Introduction • Electron spectroscopy (ES) is a technique that uses characteristic electrons emitted from solid for elemental analysis, not for imaging as in electron microscopy; • The characteristic electrons (either Auger electrons or photoelectrons) exhibit characteristics energy levels, revealing the nature of chemical elements in specimen being examined;

  4. Auger or photoelectrons can only escape from the uppermost atomic layers of solid (a depth of 10 nm or less) because their energies are relative low (generally 20-2000 eV); • While the characteristic X-rays can escape from a much greater depth (several micrometers from the surface); • Thus, ES is a technique for surface analysis; • There two types of ES: Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS); • Auger electrons and photoelectrons are different in their physical origins, but both types of electrons carry similar information about chemical elements in material surfaces.

  5. X-ray Photoelectron SpectroscopySmall Area Detection Electrons are extracted only from a narrow solid angle. X-ray Beam X-ray penetration depth ~1mm. Electrons can be excited in this entire volume. 10 nm 1 mm2 X-ray excitation area ~1x1 cm2. Electrons are emitted from this entire area

  6. XPS Background • XPS technique is based on Einstein’s idea about the photoelectric effect, developed around 1905 • The concept of photons was used to describe the ejection of electrons from a surface when photons were impinged upon it • During the mid 1960’s Dr. Siegbahn and his research group developed the XPS technique. • In 1981, Dr. Siegbahn was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for the development of the XPS technique

  7. X-Rays • Irradiate the sample surface, hitting the core electrons (e-) of the atoms. • The X-Rays penetrate the sample to a depth on the order of a micrometer. • Useful e- signal is obtained only from a depth of around 10 to 100 Å on the surface. • The X-Ray source produces photons with certain energies: • MgK photon with an energy of 1253.6 eV • AlK photon with an energy of 1486.6 eV • Normally, the sample will be radiated with photons of a single energy (MgK or AlK). This is known as a monoenergetic X-Ray beam.

  8. Valence e- Core e- Atom Why the Core Electrons? • An electron near the Fermi level is far from the nucleus, moving in different directions all over the place, and will not carry information about any single atom. • Fermi level is the highest energy level occupied by an electron in a neutral solid at absolute 0 temperature. • Electron binding energy (BE) is calculated with respect to the Fermi level. • The core e-s are local close to the nucleus and have binding energies characteristic of their particular element. • The core e-s have a higher probability of matching the energies of AlK and MgK.

  9. 0 B.E. x p+ Binding Energy (BE) The Binding Energy (BE) is characteristic of the core electrons for each element. The BE is determined by the attraction of the electrons to the nucleus. If an electron with energy x is pulled away from the nucleus, the attraction between the electron and the nucleus decreases and the BE decreases. Eventually, there will be a point when the electron will be free of the nucleus. This is the point with 0 energy of attraction between the electron and the nucleus. At this point the electron is free from the atom. These electrons are attracted to the proton with certain binding energy x

  10. Vacumm Level Ø, which is the work function Fermi Level At absolute 0 Kelvin the electrons fill from the lowest energy states up. When the electrons occupy up to this level the neutral solid is in its “ground state.” BE Lowest state of energy Energy Levels

  11. X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer

  12. XPS Instrument • XPS is also known as ESCA (Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis). • The technique is widely used because it is very simple to use and the data is easily analyzed. • XPS works by irradiating atoms of a surface of any solid material with X-Ray photons, causing the ejection of electrons. University of Texas at El Paso, Physics Department Front view of the Phi 560 XPS/AES/SIMS UHV System

  13. XPS Instrument The XPS is controlled by using a computer system. The computer system will control the X-Ray type and prepare the instrument for analysis. University of Texas at El Paso, Physics Department Front view of the Phi 560 XPS/AES/SIMS UHV System and the computer system that controls the XPS.

  14. XPS Instrument • The instrument uses different pump systems to reach the goal of an Ultra High Vacuum (UHV) environment. • The Ultra High Vacuum environment will prevent contamination of the surface and aid an accurate analysis of the sample. University of Texas at El Paso, Physics Department Side view of the Phi 560 XPS/AES/SIMS UHV System

  15. XPS Instrument X-Ray Source Ion Source SIMS Analyzer Sample introduction Chamber

  16. Sample Introduction Chamber • The sample will be introduced through a chamber that is in contact with the outside environment • It will be closed and pumped to low vacuum. • After the first chamber is at low vacuum the sample will be introduced into the second chamber in which a UHV environment exists. First Chamber Second Chamber UHV

  17. X-Ray source Ion source Detector SIMS Analyzer Axial Electron Gun Sample introduction Chamber Sample Holder sample CMA Slits Roughing Pump Ion Pump Diagram of the Side View of XPS System

  18. A monoenergetic x-ray beam emits photoelectrons from the from the surface of the sample. The X-Rays either of two energies: Al Ka (1486.6eV) Mg Ka (1253.6 eV) The x-ray photons The penetration about a micrometer of the sample The XPS spectrum contains information only about the top 10 - 100 Ǻ of the sample. Ultrahigh vacuum environment to eliminate excessive surface contamination. Cylindrical Mirror Analyzer (CMA) measures the KE of emitted e-s. The spectrum plotted by the computer from the analyzer signal. The binding energies can be determined from the peak positions and the elements present in the sample identified. How Does XPS Technology Work?

  19. Why Does XPS Need UHV? • Contamination of surface • XPS is a surface sensitive technique. • Contaminates will produce an XPS signal and lead to incorrect analysis of the surface of composition. • The pressure of the vacuum system is < 10-9 Torr • Removing contamination • To remove the contamination the sample surface is bombarded with argon ions (Ar+ = 3KeV). • heat and oxygen can be used to remove hydrocarbons • The XPS technique could cause damage to the surface, but it is negligible.

  20. Why UHV for Surface Analysis? Pressure Torr Degree of Vacuum • Remove adsorbed gases from the sample. • Eliminate adsorption of contaminants on the sample. • Prevent arcing and high voltage breakdown. • Increase the mean free path for electrons, ions and photons. 2 10 Low Vacuum -1 10 Medium Vacuum -4 10 High Vacuum -8 10 Ultra-High Vacuum -11 10

  21. The Photoelectric Process Ejected Photoelectron Incident X-ray Free Electron Level • XPS spectral lines are identified by the shell from which the electron was ejected (1s, 2s, 2p, etc.). • The ejected photoelectron has kinetic energy: KE=hv-BE- • Following this process, the atom will release energy by the emission of an Auger Electron. Conduction Band Fermi Level Valence Band 2p L2,L3 2s L1 1s K

  22. e- lower layer but no collisions e- top layer Outer surface e- lower layer with collisions X-Rays Inner surface Atoms layers X-Rays on the Surface

  23. X-Rays on the Surface • The X-Rays will penetrate to the core e- of the atoms in the sample. • Some e-s are going to be released without any problem giving the Kinetic Energies (KE) characteristic of their elements. • Other e-s will come from inner layers and collide with other e-s of upper layers • These e- will be lower in lower energy. • They will contribute to the noise signal of the spectrum.

  24. X-Rays and the Electrons X-Ray Electron without collision Electron with collision The noise signal comes from the electrons that collide with other electrons of different layers. The collisions cause a decrease in energy of the electron and it no longer will contribute to the characteristic energy of the element.

  25. What e-s can the Cylindrical Mirror Analyzer Detect? • The CMA not only can detect electrons from the irradiation of X-Rays, it can also detect electrons from irradiation by the e- gun. • The e- gun it is located inside the CMA while the X-Ray source is located on top of the instrument. • The only electrons normally used in a spectrum from irradiation by the e- gun are known as Auger e-s. Auger electrons are also produced by X-ray irradiation.

  26. X-Rays and Auger Electrons • When the core electron leaves a vacancy an electron of higher energy will move down to occupy the vacancy while releasing energy by: • photons • Auger electrons • Each Auger electron carries a characteristic energy that can be measured.

  27. Two Ways to Produce Auger Electrons • The X-Ray source can irradiate and remove the e- from the core level causing the e- to leave the atom • A higher level e- will occupy the vacancy. • The energy released is given to a third higher level e-. • This is the Auger electron that leaves the atom. The axial e- gun can irradiate and remove the core e- by collision. Once the core vacancy is created, the Auger electron process occurs the same way.

  28. Auger Relation of Core Hole Emitted Auger Electron Free Electron Level • L electron falls to fill core level vacancy (step 1). • KLL Auger electron emitted to conserve energy released in step 1. • The kinetic energy of the emitted Auger electron is: • KE=E(K)-E(L2)-E(L3). Conduction Band Fermi Level Valence Band 2p L2,L3 2s L1 1s K

  29. Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) e- released from the top layer Outer surface Inner surface Electron beam from the e- gun Atom layers

  30. Cylindrical Mirror Analyzer (CMA) • The electrons ejected will pass through a device called a CMA. • The CMA has two concentric metal cylinders at different voltages. • One of the metal cylinders will have a positive voltage and the other will have a 0 voltage. This will create an electric field between the two cylinders. • The voltages on the CMA for XPS and Auger e-s are different.

  31. Cylindrical Mirror Analyzer (CMA) • When the e-s pass through the metal cylinders, they will collide with one of the cylinders or they will just pass through. • If the e-’s velocity is too high it will collide with the outer cylinder • If is going too slow then will collide with the inner cylinder. • Only the e- with the right velocity will go through the cylinders to reach the detector. • With a change in cylinder voltage the acceptable kinetic energy will change and then you can count how many e-s have that KE to reach the detector.

  32. X-Rays Source 0 V 0 V +V +V +V +V Sample Holder 0 V 0 V Cylindrical Mirror Analyzer (CMA) Electron Pathway through the CMA Slit Detector

  33. XPS Energy Scale- Kinetic energy Equation • KE= hv - BE - spec • Where: BE= Electron Binding Energy • KE= Electron Kinetic Energy • spec= Spectrometer Work Function • Photoelectron line energies: Dependenton photon energy. • Auger electron line energies: Not Dependenton photon energy. • If XPS spectra were presented on a kinetic energy scale, one would need to know the X-ray source energy used to collect the data in order to compare the chemical states in the sample with data collected using another source.

  34. XPS Energy Scale- Binding energy • BE = hv - KE - spec • Where: BE= Electron Binding Energy • KE= Electron Kinetic Energy • spec= Spectrometer Work Function • Photoelectron line energies: Not Dependent on photon energy. • Auger electron line energies: Dependenton photon energy. • The binding energy scale was derived to make uniform comparisons of chemical states straight forward.

  35. # of electrons E E E Binding energy (eV) KE versus BE KE can be plotted depending on BE Each peak represents the amount of e-s at a certain energy that is characteristic of some element. BE increase from right to left 1000 eV 0 eV KE increase from left to right

  36. The X-Ray will hit the e-s in the bulk (inner e- layers) of the sample e- will collide with other e- from top layers, decreasing its energy to contribute to the noise, at lower kinetic energy than the peak . The background noise increases with BE because the SUM of all noise is taken from the beginning of the analysis. N = noise N4 # of electrons N3 N2 N1 Binding energy Ntot=N1 + N2 + N3+ N4 Interpreting XPS Spectrum: Background

  37. XPS Spectrum • The XPS peaks are sharp. • In a XPS graph it is possible to see Auger electron peaks. • The Auger peaks are usually wider peaks in a XPS spectrum. • Aluminum foil is used as an example on the next slide.

  38. XPS Spectrum O 1s O Auger O because of Mg source C O 2s Al Al Sample and graphic provided by William Durrer, Ph.D. Department of Physics at the Univertsity of Texas at El Paso

  39. Auger Spectrum Characteristic of Auger graphs The graph goes up as KE increases. Sample and graphic provided by William Durrer, Ph.D. Department of Physics at the Univertsity of Texas at El Paso

  40. Identification of XPS Peaks • The plot has characteristic peaks for each element found in the surface of the sample. • There are tables with the KE and BE already assigned to each element. • After the spectrum is plotted you can look for the designated value of the peak energy from the graph and find the element present on the surface.

  41. X-rays vs. e- Beam • X-Rays • Hit all sample area simultaneously permitting data acquisition that will give an idea of the average composition of the whole surface. • Electron Beam • It can be focused on a particular area of the sample to determine the composition of selected areas of the sample surface.

  42. Consider as non-destructive because it produces soft x-rays to induce photoelectron emission from the sample surface Provide information about surface layers or thin film structures Applications in the industry: Polymer surface Catalyst Corrosion Adhesion Semiconductors Dielectric materials Electronics packaging Magnetic media Thin film coatings XPS Technology

  43. Applications of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

  44. XPS Analysis of Pigment from Mummy Artwork Pb3O4 Egyptian Mummy 2nd Century AD World Heritage Museum University of Illinois PbO2 C O 150 145 140 135 130 Binding Energy (eV) Pb Pb N Ca XPS analysis showed that the pigment used on the mummy wrapping was Pb3O4 rather than Fe2O3 Na Cl Pb 500 400 300 200 100 0 Binding Energy (eV)

  45. Analysis of Carbon Fiber- Polymer Composite Material by XPS XPS analysis identifies the functional groups present on composite surface. Chemical nature of fiber-polymer interface will influence its properties. -C-C- Woven carbon fiber composite -C-O -C=O

  46. Analysis of Materials for Solar Energy Collection by XPS Depth Profiling-The amorphous-SiC/SnO2 Interface The profile indicates a reduction of the SnO2 occurred at the interface during deposition. Such a reduction would effect the collector’s efficiency. Photo-voltaic Collector SnO2 Sn Solar Energy Conductive Oxide- SnO2 Depth p-type a-SiC 500 496 492 488 484 480 a-Si Binding Energy, eV Data courtesy A. Nurrudin and J. Abelson, University of Illinois

  47. Angle-resolved XPS q =15° q = 90° q More Surface Sensitive Less Surface Sensitive q Information depth = dsinq d = Escape depth ~ 3 l q = Emission angle relative to surface l =Inelastic Mean Free Path

  48. Angle-resolved XPS Analysis of Self-Assembling Monolayers • Angle Resolved XPS Can Determine • Over-layer Thickness • Over-layer Coverage Data courtesy L. Ge, R. Haasch and A. Gewirth, University of Illinois

More Related