1 / 14

Disaster vs. Systems Engineering

Disaster vs. Systems Engineering. INCOSE Monthly Meeting 13 September 2006 Presented by: Bob Pierson. Disaster vs. Systems Engineering. A Discussion Based Partially on the special section of INCOSE Insight July 2006, Vol. 8 Issue 3

nishan
Télécharger la présentation

Disaster vs. Systems Engineering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Disaster vs. Systems Engineering INCOSE Monthly Meeting 13 September 2006 Presented by: Bob Pierson

  2. Disaster vs. Systems Engineering • A Discussion • Based Partially on the special section of INCOSE Insight • July 2006, Vol. 8 Issue 3 • Sponsored by the INCOSE Anti-Terrorism International Working Group (ATIWG) • Major natural disasters and terrorist activities: • “What can the discipline of systems engineering contribute to mitigate the damages caused by such disasters and possibly even to prevent them?”– William F. Mackey

  3. Broadening Definition of the Issue? Disaster vs. Systems Engineering • History and Evolution of the ATIWG • Based on William Mackey, “A History of INCOSE’s Activities in Public Interest Issues” • 2001 (early): INCOSE Revitalization Project established to: • Harness talents of foremost experts across SE • Address public interest challenges • “An unsolved problem that has negative effects on people of various cultures and geographical locations and that is amenable to the application of systems engineering” • Sept 2001: Anti-Terrorism International Working Group chartered • 2002: First Panel at Las Vegas Symposium: “The Role of Systems Engineering in Combating Terorism” • 2003: 2nd Panel at Arlington Symposium: “The Role of Systems Engineering in Combating FUTURE Acts of Terrorism” plus models, simulation & analysis • 2004: 3rd Panel at Toulouse Symposium: “Recent Systems Development And Legal Efforts to Secure National Borders in the U.S., Europe, Israel, and Iraq” plus papers, tutorial at Mid-Atlantic Conference • 2005: 4th Panel at Rochester Symposium: “Will the International Community’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy Reduce or Eradicate Terrorism?” plus Root Cause Analysis • 2006: 5th Panel at Orlando Symposium: “Are Natural Dissaters Similar or Dissimilar to Terrorist Attacks?”

  4. Still a Small Threat Compared to Daily Hazards? • U.S. gun deaths are about twice this every year • U.S. accidental deaths are about twice this every month • U.S. cancer deaths equal this about every two days • But Fear/Effect Ratio is Very High! Disaster vs. Systems Engineering • Recent Terrorist Events • William Mackey, “A Recent History of Terrorism and Natural Disasters” Better SE Through Terror? think of border drug tunnels, an outstanding SE success? Recent events… ”demonstrate that terrorist groups have the ability to perform systematic analyses and use sophisticated systems – built by industrialized countries – against random innocent people at virtually any location on the globe.” – William Mackey, “A History of INCOSE’s Activities in Public Interest Issues” ? I apologize here. These are very emotional topics and many of us knew or lost acquaintances. By adopting a somewhat flippant tone, I may offend. But my intention is not to diminish the horror or the loss, but to add some perspective.

  5. “Natural” Disasters? Disaster vs. Systems Engineering • Selected Natural Disasters • William Mackey, “A Recent History of Terrorism and Natural Disasters” >10 M deaths >1 M deaths >100K deaths >10K deaths >1K deaths

  6. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Disaster vs. Systems Engineering • How Are Terrorism & Natural Disaster Similar / Dissimilar? • Joe Carl, “Anti-Terrorism International Working Group Panel 2006 – Position Paper: How Are Natural Disasters Similar or Dissimilar to Terrorist Attacks? – A Debate on the Issues”

  7. Disaster vs. Systems Engineering • Behavioral Response Model(s) • From Joseph Carl, “Natural Calamities and Terrorism Events Have Similar Consequences”, • Generalized From William Mackey’s Terrorism-Specific Model • Different Causes (mother nature, human intention) • Common Consequences • Three Responses Nice model. But, how to allocate limited resources among the three responses? And from which other problem do we take the resources? MACKEY’s RESPONSE MODEL CARL’s RESPONSE MODEL

  8. fears insights everybody else fears insights decision maker Disaster vs. Systems Engineering • A Discussion • Major natural disasters and terrorist activities: • “What can the discipline of systems engineering contribute to mitigate the damages caused by such disasters and possibly even to prevent them?” – William F. Mackey, theme editor • “We believe that our objective, disciplined approach to problem analysis limits the emotional response to such difficult challenges and offers insights that inform government decision makers.” – William F. Mackey Not sure I’m as optimistic… SE provides

  9. Disaster vs. Systems Engineering • The Speaker’s Personal Perspectives (Gloom & Doom 101?) • Two Key Factors • The Limits of Risk Management • Risk Is Limitless; Resources Are Note • Unintended Consequence • Our Successful Systems Make Us Vulnerable • Let’s Start From a Geophysical Perspective… • Before Getting to Humans… And Godzilla

  10. 8 Great 7 Major 6 Strong 5 Moderate Earthquake Magnitude 4 Light 3 2 106105104 103102101100 1/frequency (years) Disaster vs. Systems Engineering • The Limits of Risk Management • Magnitude vs. Likelihood Problem in Natural Disasters EARTHQUAKES: Motion x10; Release Energy x32; per 1.0 magnitude We think we can localize. Can we really? 60% of Memphis leveled?

  11. Disaster vs. Systems Engineering • The Limits of Risk Management • Magnitude vs. Likelihood Problem in Natural Disasters (concluded) 108 BOLIDES (METEORS): Similar log-log scaling with extreme events known in the geologic record No hope of localizing within a latitude band K-T Impact 106 104 global catastrophe 102 Megatons TNT Equivalent Meteor Crater, AZ 100 10-2 Annual Event ~ 20 kilotons 100102104106108 1/frequency (years) THE PROBLEM IS: likelihood(event)*likelihood(you dying) goes up with scale of event So, rationally, we would invest our resources addressing the most unlikely event? Unlikely!

  12. ? 2100 2000 1900 108 collapse of civilization 106 death star 104 Magnitude of Human Disaster evil empire 102 invention of reality TV 100 bad hair day 10-2 10010-210-410-610-8 1/frequency (years) Disaster vs. Systems Engineering • The Limits of Risk Management • Magnitude vs. Likelihood Problem in Human-Induced Disasters • Do Human-Caused Disasters Have a Similar Risk-Likelihood Curve? • And, Even Worse, Is The Curve Not Static? HUMAN-CAUSED DISASTERS: Seem to populate a similar likelihood vs consequence curve BUT, unlike natural causes:  Seem to be accelerating  And increasing in severity There is an underlying exponential growth curve that affects our ability & willingness to do intentional harm and our likelihood of creating unintentional consequences. THE 2nd PROBLEM (HUMAN-INDUCED) IS: likelihood(event)*likelihood(you dying) accelerates with time So, rationally, we would focus our resources averting the very worst imaginable human catastrophes and learn to accept increased day to day insecurity in return? Good luck! Again, I apologize here. Famine and genocide are not equivalent to bad TV. The humor, again, is to keep some perspective.

  13. Disaster vs. Systems Engineering • Unintended Consequences • Our Successful Systems Make Us Vulnerable • Or…terrorists need cell phones… • power grids, water supplies, global trade… Recent events… ”demonstrate that terrorist groups have the ability to perform systematic analyses and use sophisticated systems – built by industrialized countries – against random innocent people at virtually any location on the globe.” – William Mackey, “A History of INCOSE’s Activities in Public Interest Issues” CHUANG-TZU: Was asked how it could be that an evil despot had wrecked a formerly well-run and respected Chinese state by taking it over and engaging in a campaign of war and terror. Chuang Tzu’s reply: because it was well run. In trying to keep our treasure, we bind it up with heavy locks and chains. But if a big enough thief sees the opportunity, they’ll pick up the whole thing and their only worry is that the locks and chains might give as they cart it all away! THE GODZILLA FACTOR: Unintended consequence & fear establish a human negative feedback (now heavily exploited by terrorists): In the original Gojira (Godzilla) movie, badly deployed systems engineering creates/unleashes the monster unintentionally through nuclear testing and the hero scientist (systems engineer) is forced to make the impossible decision whether to unleash a yet more deadly technology (with yet worse unintended consequences?) in order to destroy the monster…

  14. SE • To succeed, we must address the human condition: • limitless risk vs. limited resources • unintended consequences vs precaution • (3) human fear as a root cause • Is this an SE task? Disaster vs. Systems Engineering

More Related