1 / 11

Systems Engineering

Systems Engineering. Mike Pryzby Swales Aerospace August 16-17, 2005. LRO Systems Team. LRO Systems Engineering Implementation Approach.

hachi
Télécharger la présentation

Systems Engineering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Systems Engineering Mike Pryzby Swales Aerospace August 16-17, 2005

  2. LRO Systems Team

  3. LRO Systems Engineering Implementation Approach • SE is integrated into project as defined in our SEMP in accordance with GPR 7120.5 and tailored to reflect the successful approach taken by the core LRO team on past missions • Key SE documents include; SEMP, Golden Rules, MRD & Siblings including Electrical, Mechanical, Thermal, and Pointing specifications, Allocations and Con Ops documents • Gold used by subsystems as requirements at L2/L3. Compliance matrix in process, due at PDR • SE activities defined by phase in our SEMP, phase A&B presented today • Evidence of our SE process is the content of this SRR

  4. Preliminary Analysis - Phase A Understanding the Objectives - Understand and define Level 1 science requirements; Identify full and minimum mission reqs - 1st draft of Level 1 reqs for review at MDR - Validate Level 1 requirement and show flowdown to Level 2 requirements at MD Operations Concept Development - Identify and define LRO Mission Phases - Complete preliminary draft version of LRO Operation Concept Document Architecture & Design Development - Review LRO ORDT Report & previous concept studies - Identify key LRO design drivers & perform trade studies of various implementation design concepts - Define architecture design concept and balance with reqs and ops concept Requirements Identification & Management - Define draft Level 2 MRD reqs & demonstrate flowdown & traceability to Level 1 reqs at MDR - Detailed walkthrough of MRD Level 2 reqs traceability and assignment at SRR - Initial entry of MRD Level 2 reqs into DOORS database for mgmt and tracking - Define initial LRO Doc Tree, detailing subsystem reqs documentation structure & responsibility Validation & Verification - Perform initial trade studies and fold into initial system architecture design concept - Demonstrate MRD Level 2 reqs traceability to Level 1 reqs and to implementation design concept at SRR Interfaces & ICDs - Begin initial discussions across instrument and subsystem lines on interface design concepts as part of initial architecture design baseline effort - Identify proposed ICD documents within LRO Document Tree Mission Environments - Complete initial radiation environment assessment and document in draft radiation white paper - Distribute contamination questionnaire to Instr, establish contamination working group, and complete draft contamination assessment - Define initial flight operational & test environments in Systems Verif & Envi Def document Technical Resource Budget Tracking - Establish formulation resource allocations as part of architecture design concept investigations - Baseline resource allocations at end of Phase A within SCR allocation margins - Bring resource allocations under CM at beginning of Phase B Risk Management - Establish Risk Management Plan & Procedures & identify, classify, & report initial risk items - Begin initial fault tree analysis and reliability block diagrams and use to optimize design concept System Milestone Reviews - Hold Mission Design Retreat (MDR) to review Level 1 reqs and initial design concept - Hold System Reqs retreat (SRR) for detailed walkthrough of Level 2 MRD reqs and demonstrate flowdown & traceability to Level 1 reqs - Hold SRR/SCR for external review team- acts as review milestone for progression Phase B Configuration Management & Documentation - Define LRO document tree and define subject, when due, and who responsible for each document System Engineering Management Plan - Complete draft SEMP and plans for Phase A definition of “single system design” concept - Update SEMP for Phase B activity plans to “design the right system” Phase A Plans and ActivitiesLRO SEMP (431-PLAN-000005) System Engineering Lifecycle Activities MatrixAll Completed 

  5. System Definition - Phase B Understanding the Objectives - Level 1 Science Reqs competed & signed off by NASA HQ; Includes minimum mission reqs - Track any changes to Level 1 reqs (changes req NASA HQ approval) - Refine LRO Mission Phases definitions and LRO Operation Concept Document Operations Concept Development  Architecture & Design Development ◘ - CM block diagram of LRO architecture design concept - Begin preliminary system and subsystem design process - Begin conceptual breadboard design process; use breadboards as testbeds and for interface testing across ss for risk reduction Requirements Identification & Management - Define draft Level 2 MRD reqs & demonstrate flowdown & traceability to Level 1 reqs at MDR - Detailed walkthrough of MRD Level 2 reqs traceability and assignment at SRR - Initial entry of MRD Level 2 reqs into DOORS database for mgmt and tracking - Define initial LRO Doc Tree, detailing subsystem reqs documentation structure & responsibility Validation & Verification ◘ - Update MRD Level 2 reqs with verification information and use process to check validity of reqs Interfaces & ICDs - Baseline and release initial documents and ICDs on LRO Document Tree Mission Environments◘ - Update contamination assessment and complete draft Contamination Control Plan - Begin evaluation and tracking of parts and materials for use in identified flight environment - Update flight operational & test environments in Systems Verif & Envi Def document Technical Resource Budget Tracking - Bring resource allocations under CM at beginning of Phase B within appropriate margins - Track and control resource allocations to complete Phase B within PDR margin allocations Risk Management ◘ - Complete initial FMEA of preliminary design concept and fold results back into design - Update fault tree analysis and reliability block diagrams & use to further optimize design concept - Ongoing identification, classification, & reporting of risk items per Risk Mgmt Plan & Procedures System Milestone Reviews ◘ - Hold subsystem peer reviews and PDRs to review Level 3 reqs and initial design concepts - Hold Mission PDR for external review team- acts as review milestone for progression Phase C Configuration Management & Documentation - Initiate CCB process to address changes to configured documents - Bring Level 1 Reqs, MRD Level 2 Reqs, and Level 3 Subsystem spec under CM System Engineering Management Plan ◘ - Update SEMP for Phase C Design activity plans to ensure system is “implemented right” Phase B Plans and Activities LRO SEMP (431-PLAN-000005) System Engineering Lifecycle Activities Matrix Black –done, ◘Green – In progress

  6. Requirement Capture and Control Process

  7. Review Process ??? • Peer Reviews discipline driven, ingrained as an institutional process at GSFC and our PI institutions • Project mandated peer reviews by SE and management as deemed necessary • Examples include; FPGA’s, LROC Optical Design, PDE Architecture • Peer Review Process in accordance with GPR 8700.6A and LRO Peer Review Plan. • SE attends and assigns actions as warranted • Project mandated/schedules as necessary, part of GSFC process across all project elements • Team comprised of technical experts, internal and external as required • Desire to keep review team through project lifecycle • Contested RFAs tracked in Project Action Item database • PDR, CDR, PER, PSR etc content defined in our SE plan and controlled by LRO IIRT Review Plan (431-PLAN-000007)

  8. Validation and Verification • Validation process includes use of DOORS to insure no orphan requirements and proper traceability and flow down • Verification is part our CM process and a mandatory section of each requirements document • Verification matrix using DOORS database will include the following fields • Ownership to identify which individual is responsible for verifying this requirement, as well as those others with a significant effort in the verification activities. • Verification method; Inspection / Analysis / Demonstration / Test • Description of type of test, if needed • Verification Documentation to show where the requirement is verified • Verification Result Summary • Mission Verification Plan will define overall process and plan for completion.

  9. Safety Req. Level 2 Req. Level 3 Req. … … Mission Success Criteria Advanced Functional Schematics (concept) Advanced Functional Schematics (concept) Degraded Mission Criteria Identify Mission Success & Degraded Mission Performance Identify Mission Success & Degraded Mission Performance Risks Risks Trades Trades Req. Chg Req. Chg Risk Management Intertwines with Mission Success & Reliability to Minimize Risk • Mission Success Engineering, Reliability Engineering, and Risk Management coordinating an integrated process • Capture spacecraft concept/design using Advanced Functional Schematic (AFS) • Identify Mission Success and Degraded Mission performance of spacecraft concept. • Criticality & Degraded Mode Analyses • Critical Items List, FMEAs, RBDs, FTAs, & PRA • Safety & Reliability Analyses • Mission Success vs. Implementation Decisions • Risks to Mission Success assessed • Trades Space (Requirements vs. Implementation Considerations) • Recommend changes to level 2, 3 and 4 requirements that improve mission success • Risk inputs provided to Systems Engineering & Project Management

  10. Architecture Optimization from Single String to Selective Redundancy • Mission Success requirements flow top down to individual subsystems/elements • Advanced Functional Schematics (AFS) capture big picture; end to end view of spacecraft systems and architecture. • Spacecraft operations, mission modes & phases, timing, event durations and criticality considered. • Criticality of risk factors to mission success and residual risks considered • Apportionment of requirements to improve mission success • Hardware Requirements, Independence, Fault Tolerance, Reliability Apportionment

  11. Driving System Trades

More Related