1 / 15

The Phillips curve

The Phillips curve. In last week’s lecture, we brought the labour market equations into the IS-LM framework and derived the aggregate supply-aggregate demand framework. The advantage of AS-AD over IS-LM is that you can use the AS-AD to talk about prices and unemployment.

tamas
Télécharger la présentation

The Phillips curve

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Phillips curve • In last week’s lecture, we brought the labour market equations into the IS-LM framework and derived the aggregate supply-aggregate demand framework. The advantage of AS-AD over IS-LM is that you can use the AS-AD to talk about prices and unemployment. • A.W. Phillips (a NZ raised in Australia) found a negative relation between inflation and unemployment in the United Kingdom on data from the previous century.

  2. Phillips curve in Australia 1960s

  3. Moving from prices to inflation • Our labour market equations were in price levels, where here we would like to talk in terms of inflation. Can we put our labour market equations in terms of inflation? • Our labour market equilibrium equation: P = Pe (1 + μ )F(u, z) • The we “linearize” F(.) by setting: F (u, z) = 1 – αu + z

  4. Moving from prices to inflation • So we get: P = Pe (1 + μ )(1 – αu + z) • This can be rewritten in inflation (π)and expected inflation (πe) as: π = πe + (μ + z) - αu • The derivation is in the appendix for Chapter 8 and is NOT required to know. Simply know that this is only true for “low” levels of inflation.

  5. The new labour market equation • Our new labour-market equilibrium condition is: π = πe + (μ + z) - αu • A rise in expected inflation increases current inflation one-for-one. • A rise in unemployment lowers inflation by the amount α. • A rise in the mark-up increases inflation, as do factors, z, that increase the wage-setting term, F(u, z).

  6. Policy implications • If this new relation between inflation and unemployment is true, it means that governments had a tool to control inflation. • If governments were willing to raise inflation, they would achieve a lower level of unemployment. • Governments could permanently drive unemployment below the “natural rate of unemployment” by permanently raising inflation.

  7. Policy implications • There is an “inflation-unemployment trade-off”. Governments could “choose” an optimal inflation-unemployment mix along the Phillips curve that best suited them. • Labor governments might choose a trade-off with lower unemployment. Liberal governments might choose a trade-off with lower inflation.

  8. Phillips curve break-down 1977 1983 1993 1970 2003

  9. What caused the breakdown? • The governments assumed that the expected inflation rate, πe, didn’t change. • But the Phillips curve relationship: π = πe + (μ + z) - αu • The y-intercept is πe + (μ + z) and the slope is – α. So any change in πe shifts the Phillips curve relation out. • Governments in the 1970s assumed that the Phillips curve didn’t move. They were obviously wrong.

  10. Inflation expectations • So the Phillips curve depends crucially on how people form expectations of inflation. • Let’s say that inflationary expectations are slow to adjust, so: πte = θπt-1 • The we can make this substitution into the Phillips curve equation: πt = θπt-1 + (μ + z) - αut

  11. Expectations πt = θπt-1 + (μ + z) - αut • For θ = 0, we have a Phillips curve that does not move. For θ = 1, we have the relation: πt - πt-1 = (μ + z) - αut • So the change in inflation depends on the unemployment rate. • We can also represent this equation in terms of the natural rate of unemployment.

  12. Natural rate of unemployment • If inflation is equal to expected inflation, we are at our “natural rate”, so we have: π = πe + (μ + z) - αun • But π = πe, so we can simplify to: 0 = (μ + z) - αun α un = (μ + z) or un = (μ + z) / α • Our natural rate of unemployment is: • Higher the higher is the firm mark-up; and • Lower the greater is the reaction of wage increases to unemployment, α.

  13. Natural rate of unemployment • Substituting into our Phillips curve relation for θ = 1, we get: πt - πt-1 = αun - αut = - α (ut – un) • So if unemployment is lower than the natural rate, inflation will increase by α. • The way to lower inflation is to have unemployment higher than the natural rate. • The only way to keep inflation steady is to have unemployment equal to the natural rate- the non-accelerating rate of unemployment (NAIRU).

  14. Policy implications • There is no permanent trade-off between inflation and unemployment, as governments assumed in the 1960s and 1970s. • If the government tries to push unemployment permanently below the natural rate, it will have permanently rising inflation rates. • This is what happened to governments in the 1970s. The Phillips curve kept shifting as inflationary expectations rose.

More Related