1 / 31

Understanding Neural Plasticity and Syllogistic Reasoning in Social Learning

This review delves into the principles of neural plasticity and its implications in observational learning, notably through Bandura's Bobo-doll experiment. It discusses the process of socialization and the impact of culture on individual lives. The reason section focuses on conditional and categorical syllogisms, providing guidelines for identifying their validity. Key rules include understanding premises and conclusions, particularly the distribution of terms. This foundational knowledge is essential for understanding logical reasoning and its applications in everyday life.

verne
Télécharger la présentation

Understanding Neural Plasticity and Syllogistic Reasoning in Social Learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction and Reason Test Review:

  2. Introduction:

  3. All the areas of knowledge

  4. All the ways of knowing

  5. Neural plasticity

  6. Observational Learning/Bobo-doll experiment

  7. Albert Bandura

  8. Process of socialization (how is culture created and what role it plays in our lives)

  9. Reason:

  10. Conditional Syllogisms

  11. You should be able to identify the validity of a conditional syllogism and explain why

  12. affirming the antecedent

  13. affirming the consequent

  14. denying the antecedent

  15. denying the consequent

  16. Categorical Syllogism

  17. You should be able to identify the validity of a categorical syllogism. You should know and be able to apply the following rules:

  18. From two negative premises, no conclusion can be drawn.

  19. If a premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular.

  20. In a valid categorical syllogism, the middle term must be distributed at least once.

  21. In a valid categorical syllogism, any term which is distributed in the conclusion must also be distributed in the premises.

  22. A syllogism must have three and only three terms.

  23. If the premise is negative the conclusion is negative

More Related