1 / 27

Local Rate of Short Hard Gamma-ray Bursts & Life time of SHB Progenitors

Local Rate of Short Hard Gamma-ray Bursts & Life time of SHB Progenitors. Soomin Jeong Chang-Hwan Lee Pusan National University, Korea. Contents. GRB & SHB Motivation Model in calculation Results Conclusions. What is Gamma Ray burst?(1).

yoshe
Télécharger la présentation

Local Rate of Short Hard Gamma-ray Bursts & Life time of SHB Progenitors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Local Rate of Short Hard Gamma-ray Bursts & Life time of SHB Progenitors Soomin Jeong Chang-Hwan Lee Pusan National University, Korea

  2. Contents • GRB & SHB • Motivation • Model in calculation • Results • Conclusions 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  3. What is Gamma Ray burst?(1) • Abrupt explosive phenomenon, in hard X-ray to gamma-ray( first detected in 1967 by US Vela , and first reported in 1973) • Last for minutes • Powerful (1049~1054erg ; if isotropic emission) • Angular distribution – Isotropic • Duration distribution-Bimodality(T90 ~2s)- peaked at ~0.3,~20seconds 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  4. What is Gamma Ray burst?(1) • Abrupt explosive phenomenon, in hard X-ray to gamma-ray( first detected in 1967 by US Vela , and first reported in 1973) • Last for minutes • Powerful (1049~1054erg ) • Angular distribution – Isotropic • Duration distribution-Bimodality(T90 ~2s)- peaked at ~0.3,~20seconds 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  5. Long GRB SHB What is Gamma Ray burst?(1) • Abrupt explosive phenomenon, in hard X-ray to gamma-ray( first detected in 1967 by , and first reported in 1973) • Last for minutes • Powerful (1049~1054erg ) • Angular distribution - Isotropic • Duration distribution-Bimodality(T90 ~2s)- peaked at ~0.3,~20seconds 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  6. FIRST AFTERGLOW(GRB 970228) What is Gamma Ray burst?(2) • What is afterglow? - After prompt gamma ray emission, - Slow transient phenomenon, in lower energy bands( X-ray Optical radio emission) • Lasts much longer • Related to GRB progenitor and environments • Accurate positions given • Relatively easy to follow up 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  7. FIRST AFTERGLOW(GRB 970228) Afterglow • What is afterglow? - After prompt gamma ray emission, - Slow transient phenomenon, in lower energy bands( X-ray Optical radio emission) • Lasts much longer • Related to GRB progenitor and environments • Accurate positions given • Relatively easy to follow up 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  8. Long-soft Gamma Ray Burst • The majority of the observed bursts( about ¾), durations longer than~2s, relatively soft spectra,associated with supernovae,red shift (z>1) , known redshift of Long-GRB number- about 100 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  9. Short Hard Gamma Ray Burst • The minority(~1/4), short durations, hard spectra, progenitors- old populations, red shift (z<0.3) • Progenitor candidate- Neutron star mergers or Neutron star black hole mergers Known redshift of SHB 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  10. Motivation • The first detection of SHB afterglow in 2005 • Different progenitor system with long duration gamma ray burst • Constrain progenitor’s life time using local rate of SHB • Tools for favorable universe model test 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  11. Motivation • The first detection of SHB afterglow in 2005 • Different progenitor system with long duration gamma ray burst • Constrain progenitor’s life time using local rate of SHB • Constrain of matter density in Universe model 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  12. Models in numerical calculation • Three star formation rate (per unit comoving volume and comoving time) various f(τ) (The fraction of SHB progenitors that are born with a lifetime τ) function – power law – f(τ) = τ –β lognormal distribution- τ*=100Myr~10Gyr σ = 0.3 , 1 • ΛCDM universe- Flat space and accelerating Ωm + ΩΛ = 1, Ωm = 0.3 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  13. Progenitor model • Three star formation rate (per unit comoving volume and comovingtime) • various f(τ) (The fraction of SHB progenitors that are born with a lifetime τ) power law – f(τ) = τ –β lognormal distribution- τ*=100Myr~10Gyr σ = 0.3 • ΛCDM universe- Flat space and accelerating Ωm + ΩΛ = 1, Ωm = 0.3 Power law model is associated with Supernovae 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  14. Universe model • Three star formation rate (per unit comoving volume and comoving time) • various f(τ) (The fraction of SHB progenitors that are born with a lifetime τ) function – power law – f(τ) = τ –β lognormal distribution- τ*=100Myr~10Gyr σ = 0.3 , 1 • ΛCDM universe- Flat space and accelerating Ωm + ΩΛ = 1, Ωm = 0.3 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  15. Local Rate of SHB • Intrinsic SHB rate per unit comoving volume and comoving time • Observed SHB rate as redshift Ehud Nakar et al, Astrophys.J. 650 (2006) 281-290 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  16. Results (1)- power law No good fit If R2 is closer to 1, it shows good fit model Observed cumulative redshift 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  17. Results (1)- power law SHB progenitors are not related with supernovae Power law- no good fit model !! 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  18. Results (2)- lognormal ftn. SFR1, SFR2 τ* =6.5, 7Gyr is more probable!! 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  19. Results (2)- lognormal ftn. SHB progenitor is consistent with old populations ≥ 6.5Gyr! Not associated with supernovae Lognormal with delay time - good fit model !! 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  20. Matter density dependencein ΛCDM model SFR1 with 6.5Gyr - 0.25 < Ωm < 0.3 If the delay time is shorter than 6.5Gyr, Ωm must be larger than 0.3 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  21. If Ωm = 0.3 as current observation, τ* must be 6.5Gyr If the delay time is larger than 6.5Gyr, Not consistent with ΛCDM model Matter density dependencein ΛCDM model 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  22. Conclusion 1 • SHB progenitor is surely consistent with old populations ≥ 6.5Gyr! Not associated with supernovae, Possibly it is associated with NS-NS mergers or NS-BH mergers How about other class?... 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  23. SHB Long GRB ClusterⅢ T90=2S FT=1.6X10-4/T90 ClusterⅠ ClusterⅡ Three Classes of GRB Collapse of massive stars • Recent classification of GRB - ClusterⅠ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ (arXiv:0705.4020) • Long GRB was divided into two groups – ClusterⅡ,Ⅲ Neutron star systems White dwarf with NS 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  24. Long- soft GRB with Power law(τ –β) β increase, curve comes up, β decrease, curve doesn’t come down any more Long-soft GRB can not be exactly described by power law model.. So.. something new is needed.. If Long GRB is divided into two groups.. 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  25. ClusterⅢ with Power law Power-law model More favorable results with ClusterⅢ Related with supernovae 20 GRB with well defined spectral parameters 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  26. ClusterⅢ with Power law 41 GRB with well defined spectral parameters (97’~-07’) If Long GRB is really related with supernovae, Two classes in Long GRB seem to be more favorable. ClusterⅡ&Ⅲ 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

  27. Conclusions • SHB progenitors has little relation with supernovae power-law model • SHB progenitor is consistent with old populations≥ 6.5Gyr! • Using this tools in Long GRB, Three kinds of GRB seems to be more suitable. 10thItalian-Korean Symposium For Relativistic Astrophysics

More Related