220 likes | 328 Vues
This detailed analysis by Peter Salamone, PhD, covers the 2012 vintage trends, focusing on yeast nutrition, nitrogen balance, and factors affecting malolactic fermentation (MLF). Key observations include low YAN levels, issues of sluggish fermentation, and the influence of various nutrients on yeast vitality. The paper highlights the importance of addressing nitrogen deficiencies, optimizing both macro and micronutrient levels, and understanding the dynamics of fatty acids on MLF. This resource is invaluable for winemakers aiming to enhance fermentation outcomes and wine quality.
E N D
Peter Salamone, PhD Technical Manager – North America
General Trends Vintage 2012 • Ideal Growing Season • Record Harvest – High Quality Fruit • Low YAN Compared to Previous Harvests • More AF Issues than MLF
YAN and Fermentation • YAN values dropped from ~205 to ~145 • Nitrogen/Nutrient Supplementation • DAP alone • Complex Nutrients • Organic Nutrients • Yeast Rehydration Survival Factors • No Pattern to Stuck and Sluggish Ferments
Yeast Nutrition Yeast Rehydration Survival Factors Assimilable Nitrogen Vitamins Minerals The most important and indispensable factors for a good fermentation and aromatic quality of the wines
Where to Look ? • Poor Fermentation Causes – No Shortage! • Low Population of Viable Yeast • Fermentation Temperature Spikes – Heat, Cold • Microbial Competition – Early, Late • Toxins – Microbial, Al, Pb, Pesticide Residues • Yeast Genetic Mechanisms – Prions - Epigenetics • Nutrition • C / N Balance - Brix / YAN • Macro nutrient shortage • Micro nutrient shortage • Trace nutrient shortage
Yeast Nutrition Yeast Growth Factors Nitrogen YAN = Ammonia + alpha amino acids Vitamins 8 B complex vitamins - B1 – thiamine B2 – riboflavin B3 – niacin B5 – pantothenic acid B6 – pyridoxine B7 – biotin B9 – folic acid B12 - cobalamin Minerals 8Major Minerals - Ca, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Ni, Zn Mg K Macro nutrients >100 ppm All factors are important but… Supplement additions are usually based on YAN alone So… Balancing Nitogen does not always balance total nutrition ! ! Micro nutrients <1 ppm Trace Nutrients – Se, B, Na, Inositol, ???
Unhappy Yeast Consequences • Stuck or Sluggish Fermentations • Elevated C8 + C10 Fatty Acids • High SO2 • H2S – Other Aroma Consequences
Factors Influencing MLF • Ethanol • pH • FSO2 • TSO2 • Temperature • Malate or < ~1 g/L • Polyphenols undetermined • Nutrient Status may be proportional to initial YAN • AF stuck or sluggish • Microbial Status < 103 – 104 cells/mL • Fatty Acids C8 + C10 concentration Many of the values depend upon the specific Oenococcus strain being used
C8+C10 FA World Survey Average levels of fatty acids measured post- AFaccording to the country of origin. 282 wines, 3 vintages, red and white, North and South Hemisphere.
C8+C10 FA vs MLF Figure 2: Of the 282 wines studied: 156 presented no problems with MFL (group I in green) and showed average levels of C8 (9.0 ± 5.0) and C10 (2.1 ± 1.1) relatively low. The 126 wines in which MLF was problematic (group II in pink) showed significantly higher average levels of C8 (34.4 ± 7.4) and C10 (9.3 ± 2.5).
C8+C10 FA vs MLF MLF monitored in a wine with C8 =5 mg/L and C10=2 mg/L* (♦), in the same wine with C8 =20 mg/L and C10=4 mg/L (●) and in the same wine with C8 =50 mg/L and C10=20 mg/L (■). Trials were made in triplicate. Malolactic starter is inoculated at the initial population of 106 cell/mL at day 0.
C8+C10 FA California 2011 • 225 random fermentation samples from across California • Less than 5% above 15 mg/L C8+C10 FA • All others below levels of concern • Two problem sluggish MLF tested ~22 mg/L C8+C10 FA • The problem MLF above were ~30 FA including C6 • Medium Chain FA assay at ETS Labs
C8+C10 FA vs MLF • ? MLF issues are not solely due to C8 +C10 Fatty Acid levels • ? Native MLF by endogenous strains have varying tolerance • for C8 +C10 Fatty Acid levels • ? Undiscovered factors may reduce tolerance of C8 +C10 Fatty Acid levels
Phytosanitary Treatments and Effect on MLF • Bordeaux 2010 vintage was very dry at end of season • Washout by rain was minimal • Led to persistence of abnormally high residues in must • Folpet residue • Two phytosanitary compounds were >100 ug/L • Boscalid • Dimethomorph
Folpet Effect on C8+C10 FA Folpet is a protective leaf fungicide Indirect effect on MLF through elevated FA >25 mg/L C8+C10 FA can inhibit MLF
Boscalidvs MLF Chemical Name: 3-pyridinecarboxamide, 2-chloro-N-(4’chloro[1,1’biphenyl]-2-yl) Common Name: Boscalid (BAS 510) Trade Names: Emerald, Endura, and Pristine Chemical Class: Carboxamide aka anilide
Dimethomorphvs MLF Dimethomorph is a systemic fungicide which protects plants from molds, as well as killing molds on plants and preventing their spread. It is a cinnamic acid derivative and a member of the morpholine chemical family.
Dealing with Difficult MLF PREVENTIVE Correct Nitrogen Deficiencies in Must/Juice Rehydrate Yeast with a Nutrient Containing Survival Factors PROACTIVE Utilize Co-Inocculation Strategy – Early (24 hr after yeast) or Late (~5 brix left) After Determination of Elevated Levels of C8+C10 FA – Test Stuck/Sluggish for FA - Use FA Resistant Oenococcus Strain for MLF REMEDIAL Detoxify Wine by Yeast Hull FA Adsorption – MLF Restart Protocol
Co-Inocculationvs Sequential Choosing the type of inoculation to implement:
Co-Inocculation – For You? Alcoholic fermentation Malolactic Fermentation Pre-fermentative maceration Sequential inoculation Late co-inoculation • Lower Stress on Oenococcus at Inocculation • No latency between AF and MLF – control indigenous microflora • Enococcus, a facultative heterofermenter, does not produce Acetic Acid from 6 carbon sugars-Glucose/Fructose • Biogenic Amines – Strain Specific – Genetic Screening Early co-inoculation
Thank You! Peter Salamone, PhD Technical Manager, NA Laffort USA 1460 Cader Lane, Suite C Petaluma, CA 94054 (707 934-5771 Peter.Salamone@Laffort.com