1. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Some Suggestionsfor Generic Indicators August 2008 David Bleazard CPUT bleazardd@cput.ac.za Generic_Indicators_Aug08_2

2. Background • The SA Technology Network (SATN) is developing a set of Performance Indicators for Universities of Technology • The PIs should help to distinguish UoTs from other institutions of Higher Education • UoTs will also be measured according to generic Performance Indicators • Examples are provided here of how SATN institutions might measure themselves in relation to such indicators • The generic PIs are based on HEMIS data, extracted using the Peer Data Sharing application • The PDS was developed by IDSC, in conjunction with UJ and the DoE

3. Groupings • For each indicator, the data is shown first for the Higher Education sector, divided into groups • The UoTs belonging to SATN constitute one group • Mangosuthu Technikon (a UoT) is included under ‘OTHER’ • Unisa and Vista University are excluded • In the second slide for each indicator, the data for the five UoTs in SATN is shown • Benchmarks have been included in a few examples

4. Caveats • As always, there are some concerns regarding the reliability of the data • Some areas of data are more problematic than others • Regular use of the HEMIS data for comparative purposes should contribute to more reliable data over time • The institutions have not had an opportunityto validate their data, as reflected in the graphs • Some of the indicators may not reflect ‘performance’ as such, but contribute to the profile of the UoT sector

5. Some Student Data

12. Some Staff Data

17. Some Ratios

22. In Future…

23. Thank you