1 / 17

Rogerian Argument

Rogerian Argument. Based on the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers. Based on Carl Rogers’ theory that people involved in disputes should not respond to each other until they fully and fairly state the other person’s position . Origins of this principle.

jenaya
Télécharger la présentation

Rogerian Argument

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rogerian Argument Based on the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers

  2. Based on Carl Rogers’ theory that people involved in disputes should not respond to each other until they fully and fairly state the other person’s position. Origins of this principle

  3. Using the Rogerian strategy will strengthen your argument. • Rogerian strategy acknowledges differing viewpoints. The Purpose

  4. 1. Introduction 2. Re-Statement 3. Writer’s position 4. Benefits to opponent Parts of the Rogerian Argument

  5. 1. Introduction “Let’s meet in the middle.” The writer describes an issue well enough to show that he/she fully understands. Recognizes that there is an opposing viewpoint. Respects the alternative position.

  6. 2. Re-Statement “You may be right sometimes…” The writer describes cases/contexts in which the alternative position may be legitimate.

  7. 3. Writer’s Position / Explanation of the Speaker’s Stance “This is why my position is right.” The writer states his position and presents circumstances in which it is valid. This is where the writer supports his views with evidence. The writer state VALID POINTS of his argument.

  8. 4. Conclusion / Benefits to Opponent The writer explains to the opponent how he would benefit from adopting the writer’s position. “See what you might gain by agreeing with me?”

  9. Rogerian arguments steer clear of inflammatory and stereotypical language. • They emphasize how both sides of the argument might benefit by working together. • They advocate a win-win outcome. Let’s Summarize…

  10. Should include 4 paragraphs • MLA Format • Complete sentences and paragraphs YOUR Rogerian Assignment

  11. Paragraph 1 • Acknowledge the opposing viewpoint • State your opinion. • Imply that YOUR view stands on more solid ground.

  12. Paragraph 2 • Provide a 2 to 3 sentence summary of the opposing viewpoint. • Explain what is valuable about the opposition arguments.

  13. Paragraph 3 • 1-2 body paragraphs • Use more detail to present your arguments by raising the opposing viewpoints. • Emphasize the most important and valid points of your argument • You may concede the validity of some of those points: • “Granted…” • “Nevertheless…” • “Even so…”

  14. Paragraph 4 • Highlight the benefits of your argument • Highlight the benefits to others if they change viewpoints

  15. YOUR Assignment • Use the textbook (p. 465-468) for guidance • MLA format • Use in-text citations in EVERY paragraph • Include a Works Cited • Upload to TIIC

  16. Some Examples • Joe Sabia: The technology of storytelling http://www.ted.com/talks/joe_sabia_the_technology_of_storytelling.html • William Kamkwamba: How I harnessed the wind http://www.ted.com/talks/william_kamkwamba_how_i_harnessed_the_wind.html • Lucy McRae: How can technology transform the human body? http://www.ted.com/talks/lucy_mcrae_how_can_technology_transform_the_human_body.html

More Related