460 likes | 559 Vues
Understand the impact of weights on ball motion in bowling. Explore factors affecting roll, skid, hook with designs and study data. Uncover patterns, analyze centers, slopes for effective strategies.
E N D
Do Static Weights Really Matter? Bowl Expo Monday, June 27, 2011
From Ball Motion Study Roll y = mx + b Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax2 + bx + c
Full Factorial Designs Fractional Factorial Designs # of runs = 2k – n 6 Factor Half Fractional 26 – 1 = 32 Runs # of runs = 2k • 6 Factor Full Factorial • 26 = 64 runs
Resolution and Confounding • Sparsity of effects principle • Higher order interactions are very rare • Resolution 6 • Main Effects confounded with 5-way • 2-way confounded with 4-way, 3-way • 3-way confounded with other 3-way
6 Factor – Half Fraction DOE 26 - 1 A center point was also ran.
From Ball Motion Study Roll y = mx + b Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax2 + bx + c
3.75 1 Side 1 3.75 -1 -1 -3 3 Finger/Thumb -3.75 -3.75 -5.875 5.875 Top/Bottom Our Understanding of Ball Motion
Phase II – Response Surface Design Factorial Design Center point Axial Points
Roll y = mx + b Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax2 + bx + c
Roll y = mx + b Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax2 + bx + c
Roll y = mx + b Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax2 + bx + c
Roll y = mx + b Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax2 + bx + c
Roll y = mx + b Skid y = -mx + b Hook y = ax2 + bx + c
“Center Point” Analysis From -1 oz to 1 oz of Side Weight Roll Slope Average at 60’ Intended at 60’ Average at 49’ 0.1602 Coefficient 4.06 2.274 4.268 Influence 8.12 boards 8.536 boards 4.548 boards 0.3204 (1.6364°)
“Center Point” Analysis (60, 22.88) (60, 14.94)